Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was driving home from work the other day and I was thinking about how my 33 is electonically limited to 180km/h and while this is massively over any posted speed limit in our country, I got to wondering why manufacturers do this.

I figure it might have something to do with reaching the limit of the vehicle's aerodynamic stability - while a stock engine might be capable of powering on for another 30-50 km/h, perhaps higher speeds go outside of the rest of the car's safe operating parameters. At what point would a stock 33 start generating lift and leave the road? I suppose we don't just need to consider aerodynamics, but the propshaft, gearbox and other moving components could be reaching the limit of their safe operation as well.

Now everyone knows there are 300km/h+ Skylines out there, but I think you'll find most of them have massive spoilers and diffusers providing truckloads of downforce, sucking the car into the tarmac - and I also wouldn't be surprised to find carbon-fibre propshafts, upgraded diffs and high-speed tires.

So I guess the question is this; is the above a reasonable assessment of why we have elecronic limiters, or are the manufacurers just being kill-joys?

And semi-related; I'd be interested to know if anyone has driven a stock R33 gts25t without a limiter on something straight and flat like an airstrip and how fast you got it up to.

Japanese government legislation, they also have kw restrictions...it's a safety and emissions issue I believe.

Nice tangent though :P

Thanks for the reply madbung. I know the Japanese have what they call a "gentleman's agreement" on power restriction - but speed limiting is not just a japanese thing. The latest BMW M5 is elecronically limited to 250km/h (and is capable of 330 without), this from the country that brought you the Autobahn. Closer to home, the new HSV W-427 will also be limited to 250.

Thanks for the reply madbung. I know the Japanese have what they call a "gentleman's agreement" on power restriction - but speed limiting is not just a japanese thing. The latest BMW M5 is elecronically limited to 250km/h (and is capable of 330 without), this from the country that brought you the Autobahn. Closer to home, the new HSV W-427 will also be limited to 250.

With most German cars being speed limited, I remember topgear saying that it was to keep the autobahn without a speed limit.

Jeremy clarkson gave an opinion which presents yet another thing to think about. If a car s limited to a certain speed then it only has to be engineered to cope at that speed i.e. brakes, suspension, tyres etc that can withstand 180kph or 250kph for example.

If a car is allowed to run to 200mph (around 320Kph) then the whole car will need to be engineered to hold up at those sorts of speeds.

Maybe its the law of dimishing returns?

Unfortunately I can't remember which episode of top gear he said that on, but I do remember that he was talking about why Mercedes chose to limit its CL cars to 155mph or something.

Edited by ras1983

Put it this way; when the r34 gtr was imported into the UK, extra oil coolers had to be added for the european market as in germany the autobarn could see cruising at more than 180km/h for a few hours so extra cooling is required.

Tyres might have to be changed to cope with the extra stresses.

oh forgot to add; the new HSV thingys antenna would rattle at over 240km/h

the range rover sports tyres would only hold just over 200km/h so it had to be limited to stop the tyres from bursting.

Basically the speed is limited to whatever various components were made to cope with for long periods of time, not just a quick blast to 300km/h and stop. etc!

Jeremy clarkson gave an opinion which presents yet another thing to think about. If a car s limited to a certain speed then it only has to be engineered to cope at that speed i.e. brakes, suspension, tyres etc that can withstand 180kph or 250kph for example.

If a car is allowed to run to 200mph (around 320Kph) then the whole car will need to be engineered to hold up at those sorts of speeds.

Maybe its the law of dimishing returns?

Unfortunately I can't remember which episode of top gear he said that on, but I do remember that he was talking about why Mercedes chose to limit its CL cars to 155mph or something.

Correct, he said it on the Super Car Special (The one where he keeps pouring all sorts of alcohol into a big cup to describe the Lamborghini and how they keep adding more power hahahaha).

Said the mercedes would need 300km/h tyres, 300km/h brakes, 300km/h suspension etc etc and that would make the car so much more expensive, therefore they speed limit it so they don't need to build it for such a high speed. Makes a lot of sense when you think of it from an Engineering point of view when you have to build a car to a certain budget.

after just reading the misinformation thread i should probably stay quiet but I thought* it was a marketing thing, so the GTS-t's top speed is 180km/h and the GTR's is 200+.

* I have no solid basis for this claim :(

But the GTR is speed limited to 180km/h aswell.

Both cars can reach way above this with the limiter removed. Top speed of a vehicle is determined by the top rpm the engine can reach or is rev limited at multiplied by the gearing ratio in the top gear of the car (5 speed/6 speed), then multiplied by the final gear ratio in the diff (3.73:1, 4.11:1, etc). This gives a hypothetical top speed of the vehicle, however the vehicle then needs the power behind it to over come the force from the air pushing against it trying to slow it down. Hence why the Veyron and other cars need so much power behind them to reach over 400km/h.

Looking at this, you can see that most vehicles can reach quite a high speed, especially ones with tall gear ratios and a lot of power, therefore the only logical thing to do is limit them to a certain speed electronically to stop people pushing the car to its top speed when the rest of the car (tyres/brakes/aerodynamics/supsension/cooling) aren't designed to withstand that high speed and strain on the vehicle.

oh forgot to add; the new HSV thingys antenna would rattle at over 240km/h

the range rover sports tyres would only hold just over 200km/h so it had to be limited to stop the tyres from bursting.

Basically the speed is limited to whatever various components were made to cope with for long periods of time, not just a quick blast to 300km/h and stop. etc!

Yeah, in spite of the price tag, I get the feeling that the 427 will still feature Holden's trademark bogan-pack build quality and dodgy electrics. I'd like to see what Clarkson thinks of it. I seem to remember he was bagging the cheap interior of the Monaro - anyone remember which episode that might have been?

Yeah but he said he loved the Monaro at the same time aswell :thumbsup: Said it was a great non-nonsense rear wheel drive platform. Can't remember what episode it was, but they pretty much spent the whole time drifting it around the track and then tested it against the supercharged Jaguar and i cant remember what the other car was....an american car of some sort maybe? I dunno, can't remember.

Jeremy clarkson gave an opinion which presents yet another thing to think about. If a car s limited to a certain speed then it only has to be engineered to cope at that speed i.e. brakes, suspension, tyres etc that can withstand 180kph or 250kph for example.

If a car is allowed to run to 200mph (around 320Kph) then the whole car will need to be engineered to hold up at those sorts of speeds.

Maybe its the law of dimishing returns?

Unfortunately I can't remember which episode of top gear he said that on, but I do remember that he was talking about why Mercedes chose to limit its CL cars to 155mph or something.

Yeah ras (edit: and PM-R33, sorry for missing you the first time), that makes the most sense to me. More of a cost saving thing. I suppose this also brings up the question of why not set the gear ratios so that at the point the limiter kicks in, you're already pushing the redline in top gear?

Hmmm, just after I typed that I started thinking about power bands and how that probably wouldn't be such a good idea after all. But you know what I mean? It seems a bit of a waste to have another few thousand RPM left and not be able to use it.

Edited by diamondjo
Yeah, in spite of the price tag, I get the feeling that the 427 will still feature Holden's trademark bogan-pack build quality and dodgy electrics. I'd like to see what Clarkson thinks of it. I seem to remember he was bagging the cheap interior of the Monaro - anyone remember which episode that might have been?

Id rather have anthrax then buy that holden for 150k + who know what taxes are thrown in.

audi rs4 with an 8000rpm v8 and amazing handling + build quality

bmw m3 with an engine which requires a supercomputer to run it

mercedes c63 amg with a 6.2litre engine which fries the tyres + quality

r35 gtr that does everything and ticks all the boxes

Id rather blowtorch my nipples and lick a toiletseat used by a hairy greek or eat the money then pay 150+k for a GM holden.

Yeah but he said he loved the Monaro at the same time aswell :thumbsup: Said it was a great non-nonsense rear wheel drive platform. Can't remember what episode it was, but they pretty much spent the whole time drifting it around the track and then tested it against the supercharged Jaguar and i cant remember what the other car was....an american car of some sort maybe? I dunno, can't remember.

Yeah buts that the 70-80ish k monaro or vxr or clubsport etc

thats a good car for the money; uses the same shock absorber technology as the ferrari 655

A W427 came to work the other day, so had a good look at it. First one in Townsville from what im aware. Dude said he paid $170k for it! F**k that! Honestly i don't see where the extra money is over a VE GTS. The bigger brakes, bigger engine and the few other tweeks here and there are not worth an extra 90k.

I was driving home from work the other day and I was thinking about how my 33 is electonically limited to 180km/h and while this is massively over any posted speed limit in our country, I got to wondering why manufacturers do this.

Japanese legislation requires their cars to be speed limited to 180km/hr. Hence why the JDM R35 has a 180km/hr speed limiter when it's not on a race track even though the entire car will cope with going much faster safely, and why Nissan had to spend the time/effort coding in all the race tracks into the GPS.

For other countries, I think other people have covered it. The law requires that your tyres be able to cope with the top speed of your car. Setting a 250km/hr speed limiter means the car can get away with W-rated tyres...which may also explain why a lot of the Euro luxo-barges have a "soft" 250km/hr speed limiter that lets them go a tad faster, since W-rates go to 270km/hr. I can imagine that the other engineering requirements (having an engine sit high in the rev range, with high load due to wind resistance, requires specific tuning) to make sure it's safe.

Most of the German manufacturers have a "voluntary" 250km/hr speed limiter in place, aside from Porsche. I remember reading a piece a while back that said that even CEOs of other German manufacturers didn't think Porsche should be limited even while their companies did.

isn't also due to road conditions?? The UK gets the GTR at the end of this year without the speed limiter. IMO, Speed limiter or none you can only take out all the anger and speed on the race track (or the autobahn if you are Germany) unless you are foolish enough to do it on the street and risk losing your car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey Dave, welcome aboard! Good to see another soon-to-be Stagea owner here. The wagons are awesome — plenty of space, still got that Skyline DNA, and loads of potential if you’re into mods. Definitely post up pics when you get it, everyone here loves seeing new builds. What model/year are you looking at?
    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
×
×
  • Create New...