Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

My car Currently Needs a Power steering Issue Fixed and im talking to the guys at tenagah, But they suggested i should Scrap HICAS..

So Should I get the Cars Back to Full working standard or Scrap it?

So yea I like Hicas But Peoples Experiences With it and so forth Let me Know, Pros with it, Cons with it Vice Versa

THANKS :blink:

Benson

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/244322-to-hicas-or-not-to-hicas/
Share on other sites

Just scrap it. Everyone I've talked to who's got rid of it was the best thing they've done. Can't remember why it's so good, but no one has complained!

Plus you'll save about 10kg or something without the lines. Any weight saving is good in my book.

Rhys, 33 hicas is electric so there are no lines. Any weight saving is negligible. 32 where the hicas was hydraulic if you disconnect it at the front of the car and pull all the lines etc then the weight saving can be 25kg from what ive heard.

Everybody hates Hicas however another way to look at it is, Nissan spent millions designing the system to work....so it cant be that bad.

Having said that, i took it out of mine :blink:

Hicas was designed to be a sort of 4 wheel steer.

Great for parking, BUT

if you are on the track it will try to correct your opposite lock until you spin off trying to correct being corrected and so on

Ditch it only if you put a locker bar in, just in case you hit a kerb and knock the wheel out of alignment.

HICAS does not work for parking.

HICAS only operates over 80kmh and only about 1deg either way when 'X' amount of steering lock is applied.

It is a safety feature for people that don't know how to drive, the theory is if you come too hot into a corner it induces understeer as Nissan figure that was a lot safer for novices drivers than oversteer.

The problem I found with HICAS is the unpredictable snap oversteer when pushing my car hard.. it was also quite hard to change directions when doing 2nd gear burnouts on the brakes as the car just wanted to crab down the road with all wheels pointing in the same direction.

So, im summary: it is not a turning or parking aid, it is a safety feature.

When pushing my car to the limits I want only me in control, not some computer that thinks it's doing the right thing. Best $80 and a couple of hours I've spent on my car!

Rhys, 33 hicas is electric so there are no lines. Any weight saving is negligible. 32 where the hicas was hydraulic if you disconnect it at the front of the car and pull all the lines etc then the weight saving can be 25kg from what ive heard.

Everybody hates Hicas however another way to look at it is, Nissan spent millions designing the system to work....so it cant be that bad.

Having said that, i took it out of mine :)

My bad :D. Now that I think about it, I did read that on an R32...

Either way, ditch it.

heres my experience with it...

Was going through Safety Bay roundabout in Rocko, the roads were still wet from rain earlier but it wasnt raining anymore. No one else was on the road and I know this corner like the back of my hand. I had 2 chicks in the car with me and I gave it a boot just as I was exitting and straightening up the roundabout so it was safe, it lost a fraction of traction but didnt slide or anything like that, just a tiny skip. HICAS thought I was losing control and it reangled my wheels to (supposedbly) counter this.

Anyways, what it actually ended up doing was swing me literally lane to lane. As I was in shock and never experienced it before I was trying to counter the HICAS which made it swing back into the other lane again. My friends in the car just both looked at me with a blank stare because they knew the car was what made it switch the lane first.

I didn't wana experience that ever again, was pretty scary especially with 2 box curbs on each lane, not to mention im lucky no other cars were around. Next day I went to J-Shop and got them to fit me a lockbar in and I havn't had the problem again.

And I think in the 34s you can lose close to over 30kg if you remove everything with it, but apparantly its a big job to do that.

Edited by Magic
heres my experience with it...

Was going through Safety Bay roundabout in Rocko, the roads were still wet from rain earlier but it wasnt raining anymore. No one else was on the road and I know this corner like the back of my hand. I had 2 chicks in the car with me and I gave it a boot just as I was exitting and straightening up the roundabout so it was safe, it lost a fraction of traction but didnt slide or anything like that, just a tiny skip. HICAS thought I was losing control and it reangled my wheels to (supposedbly) counter this.

Anyways, what it actually ended up doing was swing me literally lane to lane. As I was in shock and never experienced it before I was trying to counter the HICAS which made it swing back into the other lane again. My friends in the car just both looked at me with a blank stare because they knew the car was what made it switch the lane first.

I didn't wana experience that ever again, was pretty scary especially with 2 box curbs on each lane, not to mention im lucky no other cars were around. Next day I went to J-Shop and got them to fit me a lockbar in and I havn't had the problem again.

Oh man that would scary as hell... Would only be worse if there were more cars around...

I have a Hicas Lock bar installed. I don't believe the system was removed.

Edited by Haunter

HICAS works in two ways - at lower speeds (above 25 or 40kph from memory) it steers opposite to your front wheels, at higher speeds, above 80?kph, it steers in the same direction as your fronts - total steering is only around 1mm, but it enough to make the steering feel more lively when cruising and going a bit harder, but not when you go really hard.

As you change speed through corners, the steering can either kick in (at lower speeds) or swap from opposite to steering the same direction as the fronts - this is really, really bad for hard driving.

You will feel that the steering is slightly heavier at first once you remove it (only slightly), and you will need to remove the HICAS light bulb from the dash (or it will give you the shits)

If you just cruise around and go for the occasional 'light' punt - HICAS is fine

If you drive hard (track, MC, or similar) piss it off - all race cars remove HICAS, even back when they raced 32s at bathurst - for good reason.

It would generally be cheaper to remove HICAS than to replace it.

And lastly - any weight saving is good, even a few KGs.

My thoughts (and I have driven both with and removed and driven without)

I'm not a fan, because no other car I drive has it so it make driving the skyline weird when I corner with my foot down.

plus when it is wet, and your trying to turn at a t-junction quickly because there is busy traffic... it's dangerous.

HICAS works in two ways - at lower speeds (above 25 or 40kph from memory) it steers opposite to your front wheels, at higher speeds, above 80?kph, it steers in the same direction as your fronts - total steering is only around 1mm, but it enough to make the steering feel more lively when cruising and going a bit harder, but not when you go really hard.

As you change speed through corners, the steering can either kick in (at lower speeds) or swap from opposite to steering the same direction as the fronts - this is really, really bad for hard driving.

You will feel that the steering is slightly heavier at first once you remove it (only slightly), and you will need to remove the HICAS light bulb from the dash (or it will give you the shits)

If you just cruise around and go for the occasional 'light' punt - HICAS is fine

If you drive hard (track, MC, or similar) piss it off - all race cars remove HICAS, even back when they raced 32s at bathurst - for good reason.

It would generally be cheaper to remove HICAS than to replace it.

And lastly - any weight saving is good, even a few KGs.

My thoughts (and I have driven both with and removed and driven without)

Pretty sure it does nothing at low speeds, it's not like the 4WS systems of other cars (such as the mazdas etc)..

it does work at low speeds because if i slow down for a turn and then gun it round the bend quickly it brings my back end round nicely, sometimes im not sure if it is the HICAS or me losing traction. i quite like it but then i have not had the car going hard round a track or a skid pan yet. am booked in to take it on the skid pan at AHG next month so i will have a better idea then and make my mind up wether i still like it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...