Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

Holy cr*p can you? I actually struggle to believe that and I like to keep an open mind. I can help but figure you mean "high flowed stock turbos" as I have seen people do mid 11s on them but struggle to see it happen in a full weight GTR without spraying or something along those lines.

Oh yeah the cars I know of which have done 9s on GT35Rs are running 1.06 but are proper GT35Rs, not running 66mm compressor covers - and they are mostly Mitsis, but the point is they have to make good power and be able to pick up strong into each gear to do that.

No, a guy I know of. I can assure you stock turbos and the car was driven within an inch of its life... this was, maybe 5-6 years ago now

Could have been more than the usual 13psi though, not sure on that particular point

You see a lot of people get 12.0 or similar, they just like to keep their car in one piece so not milking the extra thats sitting there

Wow! that makes me feel happy in my pants.. I'm only chasing 300rwkw to start with and hoping to make that at well under 1bar.. I know your head flows better but it still makes me all giddy :(

LOL @ "only chasing 300rwkw"

....sh]t man that would have to be in excess of 500hp at the crank!

LOL @ "only chasing 300rwkw"

....sh]t man that would have to be in excess of 500hp at the crank!

Yeah well only have standard rods at the moment and the setup should make 300rwkw easy :) got a 9psi spring for my gate so will get my tuner to start at 9psi and bump it up until it makes 300rwkw. The whole shebang should be good for ~400rwkw but I don't want to go there yet :(

Dont know, but i wouldnt want to try it without a restrictor,, I also never use those inline filters,,, if the motor runs a bearing I replace the oil feed line and restrictor as matter of course though... Cleaning the block's oil system when you build a motor is also critical

Really??

Since we fitted our inline filter, we have only ever saved turbos after engine blow ups.....

I wont be around till later in the year :( Jimmah should be there though? Pretty sure he's making a fair bit more than me with his 35r and in a drifter I'm thinking it'd be an interesting ride. I believe with traction it'd be a 130mph+ machine given sean reckons it has very similar top end to his rig.

I do value my life, im not sure that I am game enough to ride shotgun with that crazy man!!!

Yeah well only have standard rods at the moment and the setup should make 300rwkw easy :cool: got a 9psi spring for my gate so will get my tuner to start at 9psi and bump it up until it makes 300rwkw. The whole shebang should be good for ~400rwkw but I don't want to go there yet :cool:

For about 5 seconds :D

What about your internals? ....ECU, pump, injectors and all that jazz too? Or have you done all that?

I think the RB26's block is rated at like 600hp or something but I'm not sure about the moving parts inside. I'm thinking that they'd be rated at a lot less or what?

...also, could someone please tell me what the maximum boost would be with a GT35r on a stock RB26? I'm yet to put in cams, injectors and pump and am wondering what the maximum boost would be prior to putting the other required upgrades in.

I'm thinking that with factory cams and fuel support system you wouldn't go over say 10 pounds with the larger flowing turbo???

Edited by tommis85

Wiseco forgies, N1 oil pump, 550cc injectors, z32 afm, 044 fuel pump, remapped stock ecu, stock RB25DE cams, custom forward facing plenum & Q45 throttlebody (plenum/throttlebody go on with turbo).

Srsly, it should do it without breaking a sweat and the driveline is all done too (except for clutch.. current button clutch should be fine on the street but if I wanted to throw some slicks on and take it down the strip.. or drop 4th gear standstills.. I'll probably need to go multiplate!).

Hmmm the general consensus seams to be pro-T04z :P

For those of you who may not know - I'm deciding between a:

GT3076r (probably the best size but limited for the amount of money spent)

GT3582r (the next best size, but descibed as "boring" by more than one person. Loses too many RPM at gearshifts etc....etc)

....and the mighty T04z (possibly too big for my hp goal but described as fun and exciting lol)

For a maximum horsepower goal of around 450-500 at the treads. That maximum figure will be reached later on down the track as I don't have the biggest budget so for the time being it will probably be no more than 400 or so. For my power goal the GT35r seams to be ideal however everyone (including my tuner) describes it as "boring".

Decisions decisions :(

HELP!!!

ok, when i put my t04z on my car. (bog stock except ecu etc etc and a 3.5" exhaust) it made 315awkw on 1.4 bar.

i replaced that motor with one that had mild headwork and 260 poncams. it made 375 awkw on 1.6 bar.

annas car has little 252 poncams and only a mild exhaust port clean up. she made 345 rwkw on 1.5bar. (320rwkw on every dyno but the one it was tuned....)

so from what i can gather cams and headwork are paramount to making good power.. except for the odd car that makes retarded power compared to everyone else lol..

so if you are not planing to do headwork or atlest cams and still want good power id get the t04z. you wont be dissapointed. if you get a 35 you will get tired of it. just like anna did. (only took a few months :( )

so.

and another thing. why do people run a "oil restrictor" in the oil line for a gt35 (or any other garrett bb) when the restrictor is in the oil fitting in the turbo.......

After wiring in my ecu and getting the car running my tuner told me to piss of and install some cams before doing the final tune - he essentially said the 35r is very lazy in the mid-range and needs some drop in cams to wake it up. Basically I'd regret tuning it without the cams...

Anyone know how RB25DE cams differ from RB25DET? I remember seeing a list of stock cam specs on here a while ago but can't for the life of me find them :(

Upgraded cams is a 2.5k excercise I can't justify/afford yet :P

ps Tommi,

I'm at QR with my 35R on January 27th TimeAttack, so feel free to come out and I'll see if you can go for a passenger lap... ;)

bit of an update for you guys.

just put a t04z .84a/r split rear on annas 33. was a gt35 with .63a/r it is a good 500rpm laggier. (on hard at 4500. builds boost from 3k but ramps up hard from 4300. where as before it was very smooth. tune not changed and a quick mock up steam pipe manifold. (did have a 6 boost on the gt35)

has a 3.5" dump going sharply down to 3" at the cat entry and has not been tuned up yet. (waiting for new 6 boost and proper 3.5" zorst)

on 5 pound less its much more angry. she loves it. but once its tuned up it will be a tru back to back except for a 3.5" exhaust. so stay tuned :(

but from what i can say, it is significantly laggier on this particular engine thus far. but will have to wait and see. (refer above)

GcG turbos told me the TO4z would be around 800rpm lagier than my current GT35 set up, they said they have sold a fair number of them so i would guess they know what there on about.

just put a t04z .84a/r split rear on annas 33. was a gt35 with .63a/r it is a good 500rpm laggier. (on hard at 4500. builds boost from 3k but ramps up hard from 4300. where as before it was very smooth. tune not changed and a quick mock up steam pipe manifold. (did have a 6 boost on the gt35)

has a 3.5" dump going sharply down to 3" at the cat entry and has not been tuned up yet. (waiting for new 6 boost and proper 3.5" zorst)

Do you have a before dyno plot from when it had the GT35? Will you provide an after when it has? It will be perfect for answering everyones current (and a lot of peoples future) questions if you can do an overlay of a .63 GT35R with a T04Z. The .63s aren't really as good as the .82s for a RB imho, but it will definitely give a real idea. "Smooth" definitely usually indicates a better power delivery.... coming on hard late is brilliant for making a car feel twice as fast as it is :thumbsup:

Would it be the smallish rear end A/R of the 35 that makes it feel smooth? It'd start spooling pretty early compared to a 35 with a .82 end....giving it a much smoother feel.

The .82 is pretty smooth too, on a 26 in my experience. Probably more to do with the fact the GT35 starts "windmilling" earlier than the T04Z and the build up onto boost is more progressive and generally earlier. If you have something that comes on and builds its boost later in the rev range it becomes much more noticeable as the later in the revs the torque ramps up, the more aggressively the power will ramp up and as such the more violent the power delivery. Most people notice (/ are more blown away by) change in acceleration moreso than outright acceleration, so cars with this ramp up in torque later in the revs generally feel much faster even if they aren't. Try cruising along at 4000-4500rpm in a car with a not laggy turbo and feed your foot down to full throttle at a firm steady pace (maybe over .5s?), vs stomping the foot down at the same revs. Some people will find the "feed down" method more dramatic despite the fact it would be left behind by the "stomp" method...

I think I can make sense of that. The T04z must come on with quite a thump indeed as my mates GT35 r33 gtst came on with quite a lurch as well.....nothing......nothing....nothing....and then, at the last second....BAM! and we have 17 inches I mean...pounds! :)

I guess I'll just have to see how Michael's GT35 R32 goes at QR.

I think it also depends on how many pounds you boost. I think, if you ran 20+ pounds on a GT35 and make 400+ horses.....well, I think that would hit you quite hard too or what? But yes, I'm thinking that 10-14 pounds on a GT35 would be quite progressive depending on how you're driving.

Edited by tommis85

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...