Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

i just brought a new gt35r 1.06 rear from Gcg $1500, ill be using this turbo for my rb2630det..

(hoping to push close to 400rwkw then straight to wsid to crack a 10.99 1/4 mile) lol

Any of the merge collector manifolds are a good bet, just make sure the scavenge for the wg is on a reasonable angle (ie not perpendicular) and a decent size.

Have any of you guys debating between the two of these turbo's considered Borg-Warner's? They have a few that would fit right in between the power ranges of the GT35r and TO4z.

T04z RB25

Some mess about fun on the way back from work,

The video car (S14 SR20 running my old GT35 @ 1.5bar) and myself just mucking about, fueling still quite heavy from the drag event on Saturday (run with a 100mm turn down for drags and 76mm for street (legal rubbish))

As ive said earlier in this post, I have ran both turbo's on the same car with the same setup, everyone likes somthing different, I prefer the power delivery of the T04z.

I was running 1.8bar in those clips.

Edited by Rezlo
  • 2 weeks later...

heard good things about that turb'- would like to see a before and after dyno chart for an engine that swapped a T04Z for one with no other mechanical changes.

yeah, a bullseye s362 would be my pick. the fact they can run over 50psi is good to :D

I wouldn't even consider one unless someone/a few people actually got some tangible results from them in a street/track car which indicated they are even half up to the hype. At least here they are at least as expensive as a Garrett equivalent and nothing I have seen so far indicate they do anything more than at best compare with the Garrett ball bearing. They seem good at high boost levels, but considering most people with RBs tend to lean more towards 1.4-1.6bar tops on street cars thats a complete waste of time.

Bullseye piss me off as they do interesting turbos but then do completely biased comparisons to make their options look better than Garrett ones by using two turbos which are in fact completely incomparable specs and then draw strange conclusions from it. If they just showed things as they were I'd probably be less dubious of them, though perhaps if they did then the turbos wouldn't necessarily seem as viable.

Well a mates R32 GTR just came off the dyno with its .82a/r GT3582R. Its running mild upgrade cams (~260deg I believe), a home made exhaust manifold, and an old GTRLink which was proven to start wrecking the party as the revs and power levels started going up. The crappy old link has a 2.5bar map limit so tuning was finished at 21psi.

The car made 379kw @ wheels on 21psi with full boost reached around 4300rpm, sounds fantastic - hoping to go for a drive in it later on today. The car will be getting a G4 Link and a retune in a couple months time, hopefully that will liven things up a bit :P

None at all that I am aware of, just bolted the cams in - they haven't been spun or anything. In a couple of months time when it gets a decent ECU there will probably be more work put into squeezing every last hp out of it, at this stage it was to get it running and running with respectable power.

Can someone please post up some websites of where i could get a new T04z for a good price that will come relatively quickly..?

Im new at this and don't really know where to shop.. thanks in advance

Can someone please post up some websites of where i could get a new T04z for a good price that will come relatively quickly..?

Im new at this and don't really know where to shop.. thanks in advance

Have a look in the traders section of this site.

  • 4 weeks later...
I have GT35 with .82 exhuast on my R32 GTS4, ran 6.8 seconds @ 170kmh on the 1/8th mile, which is 10.4-10.5 sec 1/4 mile, Im pretty close to maxing out the .82 exh at 20psi- 397rwkw ,

a very old quote but im slowly getting through the thread.

not that i dont believe you sky30 but i find it extremely hard to believe your making almost 400kw with a .86 rear......especially only on 20psi. that sounds like something a 5L motor would do.

im running a rb30 gt35r .86 @ 20psi only made 335rwkw. no head work as such but still....

do you have something to back that up? i do hope you prove me wrong because it gives me hope for my setup lol

Edited by Jap_Muscle
Well a mates R32 GTR just came off the dyno with its .82a/r GT3582R. Its running mild upgrade cams (~260deg I believe), a home made exhaust manifold, and an old GTRLink which was proven to start wrecking the party as the revs and power levels started going up. The crappy old link has a 2.5bar map limit so tuning was finished at 21psi.

The car made 379kw @ wheels on 21psi with full boost reached around 4300rpm, sounds fantastic - hoping to go for a drive in it later on today. The car will be getting a G4 Link and a retune in a couple months time, hopefully that will liven things up a bit :)

Nice work - would like to see a plot if you have one?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...