Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

Cerbera's car has been parted out for about a year, so the T04Z run is a little old.

We're stumped as to why it's restricted. The only thing we can think is the head I'm using (off a 34 N1 motor) has a few imperfections in it which is causing turbulence. I'm using a china manifold, but the same type on Natalotto's car did 630hp with a T04Z. Exhaust is fine, intake is free, plenum is stock, cams are pretty big (270x10.8).

Disco, I'm using the GCG T04 rear for the 35. It's a T4 flanged 0.84 housing. I don't think the rear housing is the issue to be honest.

I would assume that a R34 N1 head stock would be better than or at least on par with my 89 shitter standard head, i'm still thinking it is the manifold. I remember back in the day Natalotto had heaps of problems with his china manifold and they did extensive modifications to it to get it working right. I dont know if Brockas has done anything to his?!?

I agree the boost is all over the shop, ramps hard then creeps and then falls over... which to me points at a manifold issue!!!

my t04z run is about 2 years old, still same dyno, same operator etc etc

Manifold hasn't been touched yet. Simple china shitter ceramic coated and bolted on.

It has a gasket leak on the exhaust side anyways, so the manifold has to come off. May see about modifying it while its off.

i was looking into the to4z with a 3litre bottom end on a 25, personally i think its a bit too large for track, big turbos tend to be slow on track cars, leave larger turbos to the drag racers is my advice. Go Hks GTSS, fantastic turbos for track and relatively tight courses....

I had the pleasure of driving a T04Z'd 25/30 in a 32 GTS4 a couple of weeks ago on the skidpan. Bit laggy compared to the GT30'd R33 I also got to drive, but, when it comes on boost.. HOLY SHIT.

Edited by bubba
I had the pleasure of driving a T04Z'd 25/30 in a 32 GTS4 a couple of weeks ago on the skidpan. Bit laggy compared to the GT30'd R33 I also got to drive, but, when it comes on boost.. HOLY SHIT.

that mikes new settup?!? how much power did he end up making?

Just got back from the workshop.

Compared my GT3582 setup (blue line) with a Cerbera's T04Z setup (green line), which were both run up on the same Dyno Dynamics dyno in shootout mode.

Not sure if Simon's had any issues, but my setup is strangled HARD in the top end. So much so, that adding 5psi and 2 degrees ignition timing gained me a whole 1hp up top. Did gain about 30hp through the mid range though, but I obviously have a large restriction in my inlet/exhaust which isn't allowing any more than 500hp flow.

Anyways, enough ricers excuses, here is the comparison:

11m59gn.jpg

Thats a perfect comparison.

You gain up to 60 hp more through the low - mid range. For a top end trade of of about 70hp.

I actually think you would find the two cars down the 1/4 would be very simular in times.

You have the big advantage though as your car would be more driveable on the street / track.

Be interesting to see once you have the issues sorted out.

How the top end power would compare on the same boost levels.

If you end up only trading 30 or so top end HP for a midrange gain of 60hp you will be well ahead.

Yup, but after 6 months of the car being off the road, I'm not touching it again for a while, so will have to make do with that comparison.

If I get the motivation I will fork out for a 6boost manifold and see if that makes a difference.

The manifold is the cheap solution, the head is not so cheap. I'm hoping that with the boost dropping off, that indicates a manifold issue.

Thats a perfect comparison.

You gain up to 60 hp more through the low - mid range. For a top end trade of of about 70hp.

I actually think you would find the two cars down the 1/4 would be very simular in times.

You have the big advantage though as your car would be more driveable on the street / track.

Be interesting to see once you have the issues sorted out.

How the top end power would compare on the same boost levels.

If you end up only trading 30 or so top end HP for a midrange gain of 60hp you will be well ahead.

yeah 3.5-4.5k about a average of 35hp more but from 4.5-8k about a 50hp average more

i dont know what crack you have been smoking butters, but when do you have revs less than 4.5k down a quarter mile :(

i remember the difference in speed of my car on lowish boost (19psi 510rwhp) and high boost (24psi 574rwhp) was not even comparable... 510 was fvcking fast, 574 was just scary :)

  • 2 months later...

Reviving this one once again. Looking for some opinions on the following, given the choice of a 3582 1.06 twin scroll or the equivalent sized borg warner s300sx (83/75 I think) both on a proper twin scroll t4 flanged manifold - which would be the more responsive while aiming for ~500rwhp.

nick have a look at nytsky's engine build thread

he is using a 3076r on a built 25 and making 485rwhp with e85 and an amazing power curve, i'd imagine your motor could make a little more...

i would be thinking along the lines of a 3076r with a 1.0ish split rear

Edited by Cerbera
Reviving this one once again. Looking for some opinions on the following, given the choice of a 3582 1.06 twin scroll or the equivalent sized borg warner s300sx (83/75 I think) both on a proper twin scroll t4 flanged manifold - which would be the more responsive while aiming for ~500rwhp.

I would be going for the TS Gt35R, definitely. I am not convinced on the BWs yet - they COULD be really good but there are contrasting results for them, while the GT35Rs are a very known quantity.

That was going to be my next question, full race are the only ones I've found so far - and at 6-700 delivered (exh housing only) it's looking like buying a whole new turbo will end up cheaper.

Edited by DCIEVE

i think a 3076r with a 1 housing would be pretty awesome suited as simon suggested. With correct setup in a lightweight r31 it would be nuts, mine seems to be abit better now with new exhuast and in a lighter car i could see it be pretty damn good (ill find out soon enough). Ill have to take you for a spin and show you how it goes and response and then u can decide for yourself and mine isnt even sorted properly. Surely a 450hp setup with awesome response would beat a 500hp setup with a fair bit more lag on a track.

on another note, the sloth (scradly) just made 430(allstarhubberlovehp) the other day on a stock neo with cams and a 3076r 0.82 with only around 17-18psi boost with awesome response

surely a built 26 with another 6psi could smash out 500+

DOOOOOOOOO IT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I guess when I say it's a POS I mean.. the solution and the stuff has the capacity for maybe... 1 spot. You know, as a spot cleaner. What I really *want* is the ability to do an entire car, all upholstery, all carpet, mats, all seats, door card inserts, A pillars, roof liners, etc. In one go. I get lured by all the jank that comes out and think "I'd like to be able to clean to that degree"
    • I've got one (not the car one, the domestic spot cleaner one, which is basically the same jobbie) and have driven it hard for hours and hours at a time. Grimy sofas, 6' floor rugs, etc. I'd blame your specific example rather than the whole category. I haven't used mine in the car, because.... you know, it's my car. So there is no-one else's ball sweat in the driver's seat, there's no kid food/drink spills or hand prints inside because they've never had an opportunity to put them there. You know, basic, standard Skyline rules.
    • I normally run with I think a 10mm, and definitely use the second handle you can add to a drill. They hurt when they bins up!   For the crush tube, once all subframe is clear, I'd try some stilsons and see if I can get it to start to twist.
    • Probably because they couldn't, because the use of the variable resistor to create a "signal" in the ECU is managed by the ECU's circuitry. The only way that VDO could do it would be if they made a "smart" sensor that directly created the 0-5V signal itself. And that takes us back to the beginning. Well, in that case, you could do the crude digital (ie, binary, on or off) input that I mentioned before, to at least put a marker on the trace. If you pressed the button only at a series of known integer temperatures, say every 2°C from the start of your range of interest up to whatever you can manage, and you know what temperature the first press was at, then you'd have the voltage marked for all of those temperatures. And you can have more than one shot at it too. You can set the car up to get the oil hot (bypass oil coolers, mask off the air flow to oil coolers, and/or the radiator, to get the whole engine a bit hotter, then give it a bit of curry to get some measurements up near the top of the range.   On the subject of the formula for the data you provided, I did something different to Matt's approach, and got a slightly different linear formula, being Temp = -22.45*V + 118.32. Just a curve fit from Excel using all the points, instead of just throwing it through 2 points. A little more accurate, but not drastically different. Rsquared is only 0.9955 though, which is good but not great. If you could use higher order polynomials in the thingo, then a quadratic fit gives an excellent Rsquared of 0.9994. Temp = 2.1059*V^2 - 34.13*V + 133.27. The funny thing is, though, that I'd probably trust the linear fit more for extrapolation beyond the provided data. The quadratic might get a bit squirrely. Hang on, I'll use the formulae to extend the plots.... It's really big so you can see all the lines. I might have to say that I think I really still prefer the quadratic fit. It looks like the linear fit overstates the temperature in the middle of the input range, and would pretty solidly understate what the likely shape of the real curve would say at both ends.
    • I got a hand held bisssel one and it's a piece of shit. Doesn't work for more than about 5 seconds. So much so that I nearly refuse to believe any wet dry vac actually works or has enough suction to clean the carpet of a car. I'm discouraged as all the good ones are $300+ for an unknown result. I saw MCM did a Ryobi video where they use this thing: https://www.ryobi.com.au/products/stick-vacuum-cleaners/18v-one-hptm-brushless-spot-cleaner-tool-only Anyone have any experience actually using a tool like this when not paid to showcase it?
×
×
  • Create New...