Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

Cerbera's car has been parted out for about a year, so the T04Z run is a little old.

We're stumped as to why it's restricted. The only thing we can think is the head I'm using (off a 34 N1 motor) has a few imperfections in it which is causing turbulence. I'm using a china manifold, but the same type on Natalotto's car did 630hp with a T04Z. Exhaust is fine, intake is free, plenum is stock, cams are pretty big (270x10.8).

Disco, I'm using the GCG T04 rear for the 35. It's a T4 flanged 0.84 housing. I don't think the rear housing is the issue to be honest.

I would assume that a R34 N1 head stock would be better than or at least on par with my 89 shitter standard head, i'm still thinking it is the manifold. I remember back in the day Natalotto had heaps of problems with his china manifold and they did extensive modifications to it to get it working right. I dont know if Brockas has done anything to his?!?

I agree the boost is all over the shop, ramps hard then creeps and then falls over... which to me points at a manifold issue!!!

my t04z run is about 2 years old, still same dyno, same operator etc etc

Manifold hasn't been touched yet. Simple china shitter ceramic coated and bolted on.

It has a gasket leak on the exhaust side anyways, so the manifold has to come off. May see about modifying it while its off.

i was looking into the to4z with a 3litre bottom end on a 25, personally i think its a bit too large for track, big turbos tend to be slow on track cars, leave larger turbos to the drag racers is my advice. Go Hks GTSS, fantastic turbos for track and relatively tight courses....

I had the pleasure of driving a T04Z'd 25/30 in a 32 GTS4 a couple of weeks ago on the skidpan. Bit laggy compared to the GT30'd R33 I also got to drive, but, when it comes on boost.. HOLY SHIT.

Edited by bubba
I had the pleasure of driving a T04Z'd 25/30 in a 32 GTS4 a couple of weeks ago on the skidpan. Bit laggy compared to the GT30'd R33 I also got to drive, but, when it comes on boost.. HOLY SHIT.

that mikes new settup?!? how much power did he end up making?

Just got back from the workshop.

Compared my GT3582 setup (blue line) with a Cerbera's T04Z setup (green line), which were both run up on the same Dyno Dynamics dyno in shootout mode.

Not sure if Simon's had any issues, but my setup is strangled HARD in the top end. So much so, that adding 5psi and 2 degrees ignition timing gained me a whole 1hp up top. Did gain about 30hp through the mid range though, but I obviously have a large restriction in my inlet/exhaust which isn't allowing any more than 500hp flow.

Anyways, enough ricers excuses, here is the comparison:

11m59gn.jpg

Thats a perfect comparison.

You gain up to 60 hp more through the low - mid range. For a top end trade of of about 70hp.

I actually think you would find the two cars down the 1/4 would be very simular in times.

You have the big advantage though as your car would be more driveable on the street / track.

Be interesting to see once you have the issues sorted out.

How the top end power would compare on the same boost levels.

If you end up only trading 30 or so top end HP for a midrange gain of 60hp you will be well ahead.

Yup, but after 6 months of the car being off the road, I'm not touching it again for a while, so will have to make do with that comparison.

If I get the motivation I will fork out for a 6boost manifold and see if that makes a difference.

The manifold is the cheap solution, the head is not so cheap. I'm hoping that with the boost dropping off, that indicates a manifold issue.

Thats a perfect comparison.

You gain up to 60 hp more through the low - mid range. For a top end trade of of about 70hp.

I actually think you would find the two cars down the 1/4 would be very simular in times.

You have the big advantage though as your car would be more driveable on the street / track.

Be interesting to see once you have the issues sorted out.

How the top end power would compare on the same boost levels.

If you end up only trading 30 or so top end HP for a midrange gain of 60hp you will be well ahead.

yeah 3.5-4.5k about a average of 35hp more but from 4.5-8k about a 50hp average more

i dont know what crack you have been smoking butters, but when do you have revs less than 4.5k down a quarter mile :(

i remember the difference in speed of my car on lowish boost (19psi 510rwhp) and high boost (24psi 574rwhp) was not even comparable... 510 was fvcking fast, 574 was just scary :)

  • 2 months later...

Reviving this one once again. Looking for some opinions on the following, given the choice of a 3582 1.06 twin scroll or the equivalent sized borg warner s300sx (83/75 I think) both on a proper twin scroll t4 flanged manifold - which would be the more responsive while aiming for ~500rwhp.

nick have a look at nytsky's engine build thread

he is using a 3076r on a built 25 and making 485rwhp with e85 and an amazing power curve, i'd imagine your motor could make a little more...

i would be thinking along the lines of a 3076r with a 1.0ish split rear

Edited by Cerbera
Reviving this one once again. Looking for some opinions on the following, given the choice of a 3582 1.06 twin scroll or the equivalent sized borg warner s300sx (83/75 I think) both on a proper twin scroll t4 flanged manifold - which would be the more responsive while aiming for ~500rwhp.

I would be going for the TS Gt35R, definitely. I am not convinced on the BWs yet - they COULD be really good but there are contrasting results for them, while the GT35Rs are a very known quantity.

That was going to be my next question, full race are the only ones I've found so far - and at 6-700 delivered (exh housing only) it's looking like buying a whole new turbo will end up cheaper.

Edited by DCIEVE

i think a 3076r with a 1 housing would be pretty awesome suited as simon suggested. With correct setup in a lightweight r31 it would be nuts, mine seems to be abit better now with new exhuast and in a lighter car i could see it be pretty damn good (ill find out soon enough). Ill have to take you for a spin and show you how it goes and response and then u can decide for yourself and mine isnt even sorted properly. Surely a 450hp setup with awesome response would beat a 500hp setup with a fair bit more lag on a track.

on another note, the sloth (scradly) just made 430(allstarhubberlovehp) the other day on a stock neo with cams and a 3076r 0.82 with only around 17-18psi boost with awesome response

surely a built 26 with another 6psi could smash out 500+

DOOOOOOOOO IT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...