Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

Only 600hp in a .63 rear for the GT35 i thought.

Otherwise they are 700hp (.82) or 750 (1.06) IIRC.

Rear end does have a bit of a day in overall proceedings... damn turbos ;)

spot on! I make 530 ish with the .82 housing and there aint much left. The 35/82 does spool very quickly compared to the To4z and bigger brothers. I see my first lb of boost at 1600 rpm, full noise by 37/3800 and it makes power all the way to 8500.

my stable mate Strik3r has a similar engine setup with the T04z and whilst he makes more top end its a farken lag monster to drive. I wouldnt mind betting the 35R actually makes better "average" power than the To4z.

spot on! I make 530 ish with the .82 housing and there aint much left. The 35/82 does spool very quickly compared to the To4z and bigger brothers. I see my first lb of boost at 1600 rpm, full noise by 37/3800 and it makes power all the way to 8500.

my stable mate Strik3r has a similar engine setup with the T04z and whilst he makes more top end its a farken lag monster to drive. I wouldnt mind betting the 35R actually makes better "average" power than the To4z.

give me your graph and his and i will work it out for you!

give me your graph and his and i will work it out for you!

They're both hanging on the wall dow at the work shop Bunt. Next time you go down have a bo peep.

Dont confuse what I am getting at here though. I should have qualified my version of "average" power. I am willing to bet London to a brick that I see far more useable power on any given circuit lap than G man does. Matter of fact I would bet my car on it.

Oh now we are talking business ;)

It shows another thing as well, not everything is shown night/day on a dyno sheet when talking circuit applications.

Plotted on graphs they might look very similar, however actually driving them on/off throttle is something else again

Drag is a bit different when its just foot to the floor, change gears and hold on... Unless your Paul, then just get an Auto and hold on :)

(had to drag him into this somehow lol)

Need an RB26 with a GT4088R to compare results with here :)

I concur, however i still will have a few months to make my decision. but my car space needs to make way for a boat so its gotta happen soon :D

i think a few uk boys have done it might have a peek over there. also waiting on strik3rs 3788r graph.

I'm sold on the 4088r 1.06a/r unless strik3r comes up with something better with the 3788

found on the uk forum 2.7L high lift cams 1 bar by around 3500 with a 4088r on a cheap manifold..

what would anyone sugest for a r34 gt-t. is a gt3582 to big will i have a lag monster?

f**k no. Go to a track day and talk to a few people. Odds are you will find a similar car with the 35 on it, ask if you can go passenger. Best way to find out what a turbo is like.

.63 boost by 3500

.84 boost by 3800-4000

Get one, dont be a pussy :P

Edited by r33cruiser
  • 4 months later...

Thought I'd post some pics of the atp gt35 t4 ts 1.06 exh housing given there are very few (that I could find) detailed pics of these housings floating around. In short the casting quality is poor, with evidence of weld repaired porosity.

I would be interested in hearing what the turbo experts think of the divider geometry in particular.

Flange and discharge aren't concentric.

atpgt35_t4ts1p06_9.jpg

Porosity and weld repair.

atpgt35_t4ts1p06_1.jpg

atpgt35_t4ts1p06_3.jpg

atpgt35_t4ts1p06_6.jpg

Thoughts?

atpgt35_t4ts1p06_7.jpg

atpgt35_t4ts1p06_8.jpg

ATP housings aren't well finished compared to the Garrett offerings.....assuming you can get the Garrett equivalent or at least an ATP modified Garrett (for example the GT32 T3 .78).

From memory based on what I've read on other forums, ATP use a sand casting method for there housings.

For comparison purposes an old .82 Garrett I had lying around with weld on 4 bolt flange.

Garrett82T3twinscroll001.jpg

Garrett82T3twinscroll002.jpg

Garrett82T3twinscroll003.jpg

Garrett82T3twinscroll004.jpg

Garrett82T3twinscroll009.jpg

Garrett82T3twinscroll010.jpg

Edited by juggernaut1

Hmm I'll have to take pics of the one I have here for comparison when there is more light, tbh I never really thought too much of it but I'll check tomorrow and maybe post them up (if I remember haha)

  • 3 months later...

Hi Guys,

just an update on my progress. After fixing some AFR issues we saw power shoot to 354rwkw on my R34 gtt rb26/30 gt35r equipped setup.

as mentioned before here are the specs

RB26 head

intake ported to runners

standard everything else

valve springs tested (no float, working condition)

rb30

cp pistons

spool rods

9:1 ratio

cosmetic head gasket

gt35r .82 turbo

Cooling Pro FMIC 600x300x76 (no pressure drop test as yet)

UPDATE: After checking the manufacters website ive found the following facts about the FMIC

Super efficient vaccum brazed Bar and Plate core, capable of flowing up to 1020 CFM

Low pressure drop across the core - Approximately 0.2% at 15 PSI

^^ does this sound like a intercooler capable of 400kw on my current setup?

3.5" dump

3.5" straight pipe exhaust (mild steel)

Nismo twin plate supper coppermix clutch

354.2rwkw @ 18psi

what i did want to ask is i understand there is about 6-7 different gt35r turbos taht garrett offer from wheel sizes to exhaust housings. can anyone help me confirm which one mine is exactly and the hp it is rated at?

Part: KC 0156J

706451 5015

my plans are to have a chat to plazmaman about custom making a 3" piping intercooler to match my front bar sizing. unsure if this will push me over 400rwkw but i do believe it is the weakest link in the build so far. If anyone has any other suggestions or hints that could possibly help me, id be very much in debt.

Thanks

355vc.th.jpg

Edited by Jap_Muscle

cooler piping size isn't your issue - test the damn cooler for pressure drop.

forget any quoted specs, half that shit never rings true - same as cat convertors and stuff.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...