Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

It shows another thing as well, not everything is shown night/day on a dyno sheet when talking circuit applications.

Plotted on graphs they might look very similar, however actually driving them on/off throttle is something else again

What would be very interesting is seeing the motors held at 5000rpm with no load then stomping on the loud pedal and comparing the curves that way.

I'm surprised no one does this as it would be a great way to demonstrate transient response. Obviously the same ramp rates and gearing would need to be used for it to be a useful comparison, but I don't think that would be too hard to do.

Edited by Rolls
  • 1 month later...

Gccg are fitting the TO4Z 63trim comp wheel into the GT3582r and are calling it a GT3566r , I guess this is mainly for the XR6 ford turbo engines as a up grade , But i was wondering if this turbo would be a good compromise between the Gt35r and the TO4z in giving the best of both worlds in both turbos , Garrett has just released the GTX3582r turbo so that also looks to be a option , closer to a TO4Z.

  • 7 months later...

I know its been a while since this thread was alive but i thought my results would spark up some debate again.

R34 GTT

RB26/30

Gt35r .82 rear

3.5" exhaust

exhaust side of head port matched and polished.

CP pistons

spool rods

9:1 comp

25psi

390.1rwkw

390rwkw.th.jpg

Nice result, which fuel?

believe it or not its on 98ron Shell Vpower =]

Never got a chance to test it on e85, especially after the twin 044 pumps and teflon fuel lines. Had a offer to buy it that i couldnt refuse. Deposit paid and the car picked up next week.

So sad =[

I never understood why people built cars like that and then sold them straight away, what is the point in spending all that money otherwise?

believe it or not its on 98ron Shell Vpower =]

Never got a chance to test it on e85, especially after the twin 044 pumps and teflon fuel lines. Had a offer to buy it that i couldnt refuse. Deposit paid and the car picked up next week.

So sad =[

These things make even more with aftermarket cams, a lad I know has made >400kw @ hubs on slightly less boost with an RB25/30 with a .82a/r GT3582R on 98 :)

  • 8 months later...

These things make even more with aftermarket cams, a lad I know has made >400kw @ hubs on slightly less boost with an RB25/30 with a .82a/r GT3582R on 98 :)

I never got to play with cams but judging by how efficient the setup was. Cams would of saw power everywhere throughout the rev range. Definitely worth while!

  • 3 years later...

I know its an old thread but I have a question with anyone that are or were running TO4Zs.

I am finding mine a bit oil blowy with a 1mm restrictor in a -4 oil feed line. Anyone have any issues running a 0.8mm or less restrictor. I am still on a run in tune with a 5k limiter and pushing 5+ bar engine oil pressure, so thinking might have to reduce the flow even more seeing that the zeds don't like anymore than 3 bar in their feed line. Any wisdom would be much appreciated.

Edited by XGTRX

I don't think you should run a restricter like normal gt turbo. I'm not running 1 on my t04z and I'm not having any problems

What size feed are you running, I am thinking maybe my -4 is to big

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Physically, you'd expect it to turn the motor 11/8ths faster than a standard one, but I'm not sure of specifics
    • Ironically the GTT was quite reliable in the 7 years of ownership. From memory I've only had to replace a radiator and coilpacks out of inconvenience 
    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
×
×
  • Create New...