Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hello all I recently purchased a r34 gtt and the vin number on the firewall has been tampered with. Now what can I do to get this car complianced and on the road etc.

Also don't import cars get given a new vin upon import

how was it tampered with?

I'm suspecting it's a car that has been previously stolen and recovered - it seems to be the done thing to scratch off the chassis number. It's a pain in the bum, but your workshop should know what to do in these circumstances. Normally you will have an export certificate that lists the original chassis number but notes that it has been tampered with.

I had a customer of my own in a similar situation, and we put the car back through auction, but I've since heard that such cars can and have been complied and registered before.

First of all, do you have an original dereg certificate? The car's uncomplied we're assuming, right?

Second of all, if it is complied, you're not confusing VIN stamping with the original chassis number, right? Because you have to add 6U90000 before the chassis number, sometimes they just add stamps to the original chassis number and it looks dodgy but it's acceptable.

Basically, we need more info about the current status of the car in order to help you out more properly.

cheers,

David @ Carizma

hello all I recently purchased a r34 gtt and the vin number on the firewall has been tampered with. Now what can I do to get this car complianced and on the road etc.

Also don't import cars get given a new vin upon import

Ok well what happened is I bought the car from a guy and he gave me the import approval paper and a failed compliance invoice so I rang up the compliance place and he said it has been forged and on the firewall I am not sure if it's the vin number or the chasis number bit it's in the firewall and u can see paint run marks where it looks like it's been filled with primer filled and given a different number or something and a drill hole through a few of the numbers. It's er34xxxxx or something not writing the exact numbers down here of course. So how can something look dodgy and still pass. Doesn't it have to be cross referenced with the department of main roads when u try to register it?

Ok now I'm confused - take a photo of the problem for us all to have a look at.

Agreed, best to see photos to help work this out for you .. of course you are welcome to blur out some of the chassis number digits but make sure we can easily see the problems you are talking about ... then you should be able to get 3 good opinions from all of us experienced importers :yes:

Ah, ok, understood. Yeah, it's failed compliance, that's what a workshop does when it fails compliance. They'll usually cut out the chassis number or mark it so it can't be complied. (Some NICE workshops WON'T do this, they'll just say they never saw the car and let you deal with it another way)

Basically, you can never get this car complied, and you're supposed to destroy or export it, but you could use it as a track car, but forget about road registration cause of the failed compliance.

I assume the owner who failed compliance put a new chassis number on just to sell it (highly illegal), but you can't legally get a new import approval with this chassis number.

Try to get your money back.

Ok well what happened is I bought the car from a guy and he gave me the import approval paper and a failed compliance invoice so I rang up the compliance place and he said it has been forged and on the firewall I am not sure if it's the vin number or the chasis number bit it's in the firewall and u can see paint run marks where it looks like it's been filled with primer filled and given a different number or something and a drill hole through a few of the numbers. It's er34xxxxx or something not writing the exact numbers down here of course. So how can something look dodgy and still pass. Doesn't it have to be cross referenced with the department of main roads when u try to register it?

Well since the original person who imported it wont hand over the paper work because another companies name is on the paperwork, then cant the DMR give me a new vin number (surrogant vin)?? or get a repairable writeoff vin and use that?

i cant get my money back, and there is no way that i can get the original vin number through the export papers.

since no one can prove the vehicles history and its failed compliance cant i lodge an appeal against them and get it transfered to another compliance workshop ?

cant send a picture of firewall sorry

plus the number on the forms and the vin match a white r34 mine is silver

No, because it's an imported vehicle. Vehicle imports are governed by federal regulations (DOTARS), and only after your car is approved by them is it put on NEVDIS, which allows state governments to register it.

When a vehicle first comes in for compliance, the workshop does an Incoming Vehicle Inspection Report. If your car was accident damaged, the workshop reports this to DOTARS and your car can never be registered. It's supposed to be exported or destroyed, but you could still use it for track use (or part it out possibly). But forget about ever getting it registered.

No hope of repairable write-off VINS either, since the car is an illegal import as far as the federal government is concerned.

Do you have the original import approval? Or a copy? Technically, you should also have the de-registration certificate from Japan, but I'm assuming you don't.

If the original workshop already reported this vehicle as accident repaired to DOTARS, you can't transfer it to another workshop.

Well since the original person who imported it wont hand over the paper work because another companies name is on the paperwork, then cant the DMR give me a new vin number (surrogant vin)?? or get a repairable writeoff vin and use that?

i cant get my money back, and there is no way that i can get the original vin number through the export papers.

since no one can prove the vehicles history and its failed compliance cant i lodge an appeal against them and get it transfered to another compliance workshop ?

cant send a picture of firewall sorry

plus the number on the forms and the vin match a white r34 mine is silver

I've heard the story through a phone conversation or three, and believe me, the plot is thicker than Santa's waistline.

Long story short - it was sold as never being able to be complied, and...is never able to be complied.

Bit of a no no, but he could rebirth it...plenty of written off lines around *cough

Pls delete if inappropriate....after all I doubt it's worse than any of the repairable write offs going around.

No, he can't. That's the whole point of the new system, to stop this kind of stuff.

You're probably thinking of the old system.

That's why the workshop damages the chassis #.

Bit of a no no, but he could rebirth it...plenty of written off lines around *cough

Pls delete if inappropriate....after all I doubt it's worse than any of the repairable write offs going around.

So you suggest something highly illegal, THEN wonder if it's appropriate??

facepalm.jpg

wow how good was that...Didn't wonder at all, I left it up to the moderator.

Pls delete if inappropriate. I was also unaware re-shelling a car was illegal...but hey what would I know.

Chef...funny?

Thanks for the imformed response Carisma

Document any lies you've been told and diarise them according to

i) date

ii) witnesses

iii) the paperwork

iv) photos of relevant parts of the car

v) e-mails between you and the vendor converted to hard copy

vi) sms recordings and obtaining a list of messages from your carrier of vendor > you; and you> vendor

vii) calls between you and the vendor as listed from your telephone provider and have the whole months calls sent to you

and then write down what you remember was said at each call.

Take this documentation to your solicitor and do not tell the vendor what you're doing if you have already exhausted negotiations.

If negotiations have not quite finished, I don't know what your chances are, if you front him with a witness ie. your witness to what has happened.

Yes, I'd feel like taking a baseball bat down there; but that's just your heart.

It's time to think with your head!!! Remember that there may be one thing in your favour! If this goes to court, the judiciary or tribunal is more inclined to believe the credibility of a "diary" over a "verbal"

Hope this helps,

Tez

Document any lies you've been told and diarise them according to

i) date

ii) witnesses

iii) the paperwork

iv) photos of relevant parts of the car

v) e-mails between you and the vendor converted to hard copy

vi) sms recordings and obtaining a list of messages from your carrier of vendor > you; and you> vendor

vii) calls between you and the vendor as listed from your telephone provider and have the whole months calls sent to you

and then write down what you remember was said at each call.

Take this documentation to your solicitor and do not tell the vendor what you're doing if you have already exhausted negotiations.

If negotiations have not quite finished, I don't know what your chances are, if you front him with a witness ie. your witness to what has happe

Ok thanks for your help everyone

if it was sold as an uncompilable vehicle and you knew , thats the end of it . If your were misled your going to need PROOF it wasnt to have any sort of case.

technically its a illegal to sell the uncomplied vehicle but it seems dotars just like the say that a lot and never really do anything to anyone who does sell them especially members of the public. this would only result in a fine to the seller , not your money back anyway

you need to prove these goods were not as described and fit for purpose . if you cant PROVE it was sold as a compliable road registerable car its not going to go anywhere.

and unfortunetly it could be rebirthed under sevs , as long as its new identity is allready complied and registered .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...