Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

for all you guys wanting to run a holset on your rb (or other engine) i can draw a flange adapter in cad so you can go to any laser cutter and get one made. someone just needs to give me the dimensions of the holset flange. i already have the t3, t4 etc drawn already.

  • Replies 198
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Crack, the HX35 flange is already T3 divided, but a spacer will be needed if using stock manfold. can anyone tell me if it will fit in a stock low mount position on an R33 GTS25t? :blink:

thats cool. you then need two t3 divided flanges. i have that as a dxf file.

do all holsets have a v-band outlet? if not if someone has one out of the car, give me the dimensions and i'll draw it up for you

thanks works, yeah i have read his thread, my concern is the different size of engine bays and block heights, i have been told by others that i will need to cut into the subframe or engine mounts which i don't really want to do. was hoping there was someone who has tried to fit one already. anyone?

  • 1 month later...

I have an R33 RB25 on the engine stand right now. It's almost ready to go into my 280Z. To answer your question, I have a 7-blade HX35 and it does not clear as a direct bolt-on. For the oil feed, the factory line fits, but the stock RB oil feed banjo bolt on the stock turbo is 12mm x 1.25 while the Holset requires a 12mm x 1.50. The oil drain line fits up as per factory. For the eliminated coolant lines, a 14mm x 1.50 oil drain bolt will plug the banjo hole off on the block.

I have seen people find an appropriate banjo bolt from another application and made it work. I have also heard people take a standard bolt and drill it to banjo specifications. Note that the stock banjo bolt acts as a restrictor. I don't think the Holset really needs a restrictor to avoid issues, however.

The only issue is that the turbo fouls the exhaust manifold at the compressor cover. If you clock the compressor output straight towards the block (in other words, a useless clock position) it will clear since the radial diameter changes, etc. With the compressor outlet pointed down, it will not clear. I suspect you merely need another T3 flange to be used as a spacer when you mount the turbo to get it to clear, but I have not tried this yet. Note that, as others stated, the turbo and the stock exhaust manifold are both twin scroll. I have not found a twin scroll "u-weld" flange to space it out. Likewise, you will need longer studs for the exhaust manifold.

Note that the exhaust manifold studs are dual thread. They are 10mm x 1.25 on the turbo side and 10mm x ??? on the manifold side. It's a coarser thread spec, but I have not measured it yet. The holes in the exhaust manifold for the studs are obviously blind, so you could just get some high grade threaded rod and cut them to length, etc.

Please note that I have NOT tested fitment with the factory engine mounts, as I am doing a swap into another chassis and did not use the original mounts. I have them however, so I can test it out if anyone is interested.

As a side note, another nice thing about Holsets is that the compressor wheel is balanced individually (on the '35' sizes, and some others) and the turbine wheel and shaft assembly is balanced individually. This means you can rebuild it without indexing or having it rebalanced. Just pull it apart, stick the new bearings in, and slap it back together.

Edited by WizardBlack

Would be much appreciated if you could fit up the old mounts Wizard, i am wanting to keep it low mount and this will determine whether i can go for an hx35, if it requires modification i'll probably go for something different. cheers!

  • 2 weeks later...

A few months ago I said I would post a dyno chart of my HE351 RB20. I'm a little late, but here it is:

14dqbcy.jpg

327 RWHP and 255 FT/LB

My spark timer is broken, so the RPM scale is a little screwed up. It should end on 7000 RPM.

This is on a mustang dyno at about 580 meters above sea level.

RB20 stock internals

Holset HE351 from a Dodge RAM - NOT the variable vein model

4" Downpipe / 3" exhaust

4" Intake

440cc 7MGTE Injectors

ECU Remap

GTR Fuel Pump

Everything else is stock

This is the first car I have ever tuned (without help from a professional tuner). I'm pretty happy with the results, but I know it could have done better.

It was running 18 psi (1.25 bar). I pushed it up to 22 psi and blew the rings out of the 1st cylinder. I have since put a new motor in, cams, and changed back to an RB25 turbo. I will rebuild and run the holset again. But I don't have the money for a rebuild right now.

Im assuming you are using the stock wastegate, and not an external. IMO this could well have contributed to te failure of cylinder #1, as the manifold pressures of cylinders 1,2 & 3 would be far higher than 4,5 & 6 as the wastegate only feeds off those cylinders, which would mean that the tune would be conservative on the back 3 cylinders.

Im assuming you are using the stock wastegate, and not an external. IMO this could well have contributed to te failure of cylinder #1, as the manifold pressures of cylinders 1,2 & 3 would be far higher than 4,5 & 6 as the wastegate only feeds off those cylinders, which would mean that the tune would be conservative on the back 3 cylinders.

Stock WG actuator, using internal Holset WG. My wastegate line was pulled right off the turbo (see pic).

How does the stock internal WG feed off 1-3? My stock rb20 and rb25 turbos have a feed line right off the turbo, just like the Holset. I always thought that on a straight 6, 5&6 would have higher pressure.

I just thought I pushed too much boost and my timing map was a bit aggressive.

2eftk7n.jpg

  • 4 months later...
Stock WG actuator, using internal Holset WG. My wastegate line was pulled right off the turbo (see pic).

How does the stock internal WG feed off 1-3? My stock rb20 and rb25 turbos have a feed line right off the turbo, just like the Holset. I always thought that on a straight 6, 5&6 would have higher pressure.

I just thought I pushed too much boost and my timing map was a bit aggressive.

2eftk7n.jpg

mad old thread revival.

he is talking about the actual flapper on the turbo, only bleeds exhaust off 1 side of the split pulse housing.

  • 1 year later...

Bigalow, I have a modified Holset He351vg turbo that I have been developing with a specialist in Canada. This is a HX40

With a unique pneumatic VG control system fitted. This same turbo on a bog stock supra Tt lump made full boost at 2800rpm!! It's destined for my RB26 soon !!!

Bigalow, I have a modified Holset He351vg turbo that I have been developing with a specialist in Canada. This is a HX40

With a unique pneumatic VG control system fitted. This same turbo on a bog stock supra Tt lump made full boost at 2800rpm!! It's destined for my RB26 soon !!!

You Godzilla32 in GTROC? I was reading the thread yesterday... Please excuse my thread jack but it seems like petro isn't good with VGT per the pressure in the manifold and I doesn't seems very reliable.

Bigalow, Yeah thats me. The Supra guys have been using these Holset VG turbos for a long time now with no issues....I used to work at Holset in the UK and I was involved in the development of this HE351VE. The materials used to manufacture these things are the same if not better than those used in petrol turbos. Sure EGT's are higher in petrol applications but as all of the materials in the Holset Turbos are exactly the same as petrol turbos this is a lame ass excuse used by haters!!!! lol!!

Bigalow, Yeah thats me. The Supra guys have been using these Holset VG turbos for a long time now with no issues....I used to work at Holset in the UK and I was involved in the development of this HE351VE. The materials used to manufacture these things are the same if not better than those used in petrol turbos. Sure EGT's are higher in petrol applications but as all of the materials in the Holset Turbos are exactly the same as petrol turbos this is a lame ass excuse used by haters!!!! lol!!

I don't trust UK products.

nyaanyaa.gif

Joking but the Supra is a different application than the RB. I was thinking about buying a GTX turbo (by Garrette) so I'll probably stick to that as opposed to being a VGT pioneer.

Bigalow, Yeah thats me. The Supra guys have been using these Holset VG turbos for a long time now with no issues....I used to work at Holset in the UK and I was involved in the development of this HE351VE. The materials used to manufacture these things are the same if not better than those used in petrol turbos. Sure EGT's are higher in petrol applications but as all of the materials in the Holset Turbos are exactly the same as petrol turbos this is a lame ass excuse used by haters!!!! lol!!

You say teh materials used are the same as the petrol, but what are petrol vgt vanes made of?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...