Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what do you all think of this new drug tester that all the cops are floggin off over ...

I hope it never hits the roads like previous models they have had.

I mean it might not affect everyone but it will affect me and if they ever ask me to chew on the tester thingy i will tell them exactly where they can insert that tester ...

I reckon that it wont be used because it would take extensive cross testing to see if anything gives faulse readings like some cough mixtures and sudafed that contain pseudoephedrine which is a main chemical that is used im amphetamines..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24883-new-drug-tester/
Share on other sites

hmmm ..depends, they said it would only pickup certain types of drugs. So i doubt it would pick up dope or something like that?

They say you have to suck on the stick thing for like 1-3 minutes, so i doubt they're going to use it that much because of the time it would take and the holdup to traffic. So I can only see them using it if they thought you had the obvious signs of being on some type of drug.

ppl shouldn't be driving on drugs anyhow if u ask me. I'm not sure whether i believe the statistics (as always) but they say i think it was 30% of people involved in fatal accidents have drugs in their system.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24883-new-drug-tester/#findComment-528639
Share on other sites

If you ask me, most of the problem coming home from those things is the tiredness of dancing for 10 hours straight or something.. and then coming down and fatigue finally hitting you, not the drugs themselves. And considering their is no "fatigue tester" then i don't see it doing much difference.

Problem with truckies is that as much of it is to meet stupid deadlines and push more crap thru to make more money and stay awake. All they'll do is come up with a masking agent or something or just change the drugs. That area of elicit drugs is pretty organised.

I think in reality, drug testing can never really do too much - just like in sport whereas the drug manufacturers are always 2 steps ahead of the testing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24883-new-drug-tester/#findComment-528737
Share on other sites

another question this tester raises.....dope stays in your system for ages......what happens if you smoke a jay the day/night before the day you are going for a drive and get tested?? Tech speaking you are not under the influence but it may still be in your system.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24883-new-drug-tester/#findComment-528740
Share on other sites

I dont think the local dealer around the clubs could give a toss if its detectable, so I think that the 2 steps ahead thing doesnt apply in this case...

If you take any sort of drugs, first off your a tool, second of all you are in no shape to be driving!!

** Note... I had a friend die through drug related causes when I was younger so im very much against drug use.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24883-new-drug-tester/#findComment-528744
Share on other sites

better stop sculling the bong water when im on the road then.A sheila got tested in castlemaine not long ago on some new trial thing and she smokes everyday but didnt have a puff on the day she was tested and it didnt show.Im thinking it prob only applies to oraly taken drugs.intravenous use prob wouldnt show.would it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24883-new-drug-tester/#findComment-529092
Share on other sites

it only tests saliva and even thor thc stqays in ya fat cells for up to 3 months it isnt in your saliva unless you had a bong a few hours earlier, with amphetamines im not sure what te go would be with taken oraly/sniffed to injected cos both ways give u the dries and make your saliva clagy .. either way as stated b4 i dont think the tester will be for everyday use ..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24883-new-drug-tester/#findComment-531189
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...