Jump to content
SAU Community

Put The V35 On The Dyno


Recommended Posts

Well after picking up a somewhat massive bill to get my POS AU falcon sorted after a mate of mine decided it would be a good idea to drive it on a flooded road I asked the workshop if they had ever had a V35 on their dyno before

Lucky for me they had not and were curious as to what a somewhat stock one such as mine would do

anyhow here it is

03 Auto stock std except for a nismo cat back

170rwkw

Guess i cant complain being an auto with just a cat back

one thing that freaked me out is when I got back in the car after it had come off the dyno after a few runs was my esp ABS and slip light were stuck on!!!! I turned the car off and on a couple of times and they would not go out. I then noticed that the car was in Snow mode and after flicking it back to the normal middle position and re starting it everything went back to normal. I wonder if it was doing all its runs in snow mode? which seems to make the accellorator somewhat unresponsive?

and for shits and giggles I have also posted my AU POS LPG AUTO with 642,390kms on the clock not 64,239kms like the dyno print out says over half a million clicks and still going somewhat

post-9102-1229510592_thumb.jpg

post-9102-1229510734_thumb.jpg

Edited by 180 wanabe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think that the cat back adds a heap to power to the VQ35 after all from what iv read the stock one is pretty free flowing although a bit heave in the weight department.

Its not like a turbo engine where a better flowing zhust = less back pressure = more boost = more power

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I think about it thanks to BLISTIC's dyno Id say that everything seems pretty normal

Say the auto has a 20% deivetrain loss and the 6 speed has 15% loss "i know that there is no exact % figure with drivetrain loss"

a 6 speed with @ 209kw @ the fly with 15% loss would = 177.65rwkw

then an auto with 213 @ the fly thanks to a catback system @ 20% loss would = 170rwkw

:P

Edited by 180 wanabe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

regarding the ESP light and ABS light on that's normal after the Dyno finished. because the sensor when stupid that it been slipping all the time while the front wheels not spinning and only the rear. It'll switch off after you drive for about 1km and it'll think that you just been to Dyno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...