Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi.

Am building up a 1000hk rb 30engine.. (3.4 liter when spool gets his stroker kit ready)

800hk on boost for track days, and 150 - 200hk nos ontop of that when quartermile.

I use apexi FC commander, (AFM model)

Question is what do I do with my AFM so it wont be maxed out? (I have a z32 AFM)

I have 3 things in mind.

1. Either buy one more z32 AFM, use a apexi SAFC neo to splice the two signals to one.

2. Use my current z32 together with Y pipe.

3. Or mount my z32 sensor in a 4" pipe.

Th car is a daily driver, so i need low stable rpms. Which option of the above 3, do you guys think is the best solution? Number 3, if that will support it, is what I am hoping for... Number 1 and 2 take up alot more space in a already compact 200sx - s13 engine bay...

Thank you.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249310-need-advise-about-afm/
Share on other sites

Um, methinks you won't find any afm that will support that power by itself, twin Z32's might but right at the end of their resolution. (changing size of pipe doesn't work) If you really want that result with tuneability and driveability then very simply get a Motec or Autronic computer to run it (they run map sensors so no afm's needed) For what it costs to do that sort of build and have it reliable the extra cost of the best aftermarket ECU you can get really is immaterial (you can factor in selling the pfc). Just get the one for which you have the best access to tuning support with. (And i'd be guessing Motec). Have a chat to whoever you're going to use to tune the car and get their opinion too.

my choice

twin z32s, the Y pipe to give you two AFM inputs into the compressor cover

and use an apexi safc II to give you a bridge into 1 AFM input on the main PFC

if you max a pair of twin z32s you can use the SAFC to bend and trim the signal

much the same you can do the PFC to bend and trim the signal to give you more scope

you can even invent your own AFM ramp in the PFC if you have datalogit (i assume your tuner will)

My only issue with twin z32's is the cost. Using a normal sensor in the bigger pipe, you can bridge and have two plugs on the AFM, which means there is no wiring modifications, then you adjust the AFM curve using datalogit as you say(or nistune as i have done)

AFM are mounted on pressure side.

A z32 in a 4" pipe, how much power will that be able to cope with?

The place it takes up is very important, as there isnt much to give.

But looks like the two AFM are the best solution?

I prefer AFM over MAP anyday... So would rather find a solution with AFM.

Look like I will need to use 2 x z32 AFM together with SAFC..

The new NEO version of the SAFC, can that still combine the two AFM signals as the older SAFC-II?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...