Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

picked ap an arc sidemount on saturday after only hearing good things about them and the fact that i didn't want to start cutting my front end up..now they are obvously not as big as the FMIC's so i didnt really know what to expect..

breathing mods now are greddy filter and inlet, R34 turbo Arc sidemount and 3in split dump, Hi flo cat and Kakimoto 3 in exhaust..

now it is no powerhouse by anymeans but the improvment is massive ...less lag, more grunt and that slightly deeper rb note..

I am a very happy man :(

next mods remaped ecu and tune

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249815-fitted-arc-sidemount/
Share on other sites

arc sidemounts ftw.

Have a r32 m105 sidemount on mine. 50% larger than your standard r34 smic and direct bolt-on for r32's.

Pulling 200kw atw and no heat-soaking problems yet. Will see after a track day how its handling...

Comparison of factory r32 smic Vs ARC m105

dscn4986mediumiq5.jpg

Nope.

Don't need to cut into the reo as the pipe bends back around underneath to the stock route.

wow the whole reson i went side mount was because of cutting up bars and reo..that sounds great..

Oh well....still happy..

How much was the arc fmic??

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...