Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guyz,

i got 200zr with old NICS rb20det, just wondering main differences between NICS and ECCS? i know turbo is diff but what bout injectors, afm and ECU?

I have an r32 turbo on atm but going the r33 route soon, just wonderin if this is straight bolt on yeh?

also canthe NICS version be epromed or even tuned thorugh ECU?

Also the stock boost controller has an electronic like solenoid connected to the vacuum piping to wastegate, can i wire in EBC around this?

any info much appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25015-rb20det-nics-info/
Share on other sites

AFM & ECU different Injectors are same. the main Difference are the inlet manifold. the NICS has a 12 port inlet manifold the head is 6 port, there are two sets of runners on the NICS and only 6 on the ECCS, the theory on the NICS was that the two set of 6 runners are different length under low revs, or take off, the long ports are open giving more torque in theory. After the revs build up the second lot of runners are opened through the butterflys which are shorter for top end power. Turbo yes the RB25 bolts straight on, but you must get the banjos and oil lines as well. Next quetion the NICS chip is currently being worked on by a couple of people to see if it can be re-programmed so will have to wait and see.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25015-rb20det-nics-info/#findComment-531580
Share on other sites

Originally posted by R32-GTS

THe injectors are different . Even on the red top. So get some first hand experience before correcting me.

well R31Heaven... be prepared to stand correct by the man with the expirirance :) :bahaha: :bahaha:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25015-rb20det-nics-info/#findComment-536105
Share on other sites

Originally posted by rsx84

theres an old hpi mag that has all the ins and outs to do with the red top rb20 if you pm me if you still need info i'll scan it and send it to you.

if it's from a year or two back...

Or maybe longer.

I've got that one (about 5 copies of it :() R31Heaven i think i've showed you a copy of it long ago...

It doesnt really have a lot of stuff in it though.

rsx84, can you scan it and e-mail it to me?

[email protected]

I just wanna make sure i've got the same one.

thanks. ash

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25015-rb20det-nics-info/#findComment-549146
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...