Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, Ive just put an Rb20det into my S12 Gazelle

and all the wiring is complete... came to start up time the other night and it idles nicely!

however will not rev!

plugged the computer into the consult port and get an Error Code #43 tps (throttle position sensor)

now i have put a forward facing plenum on the rb20det so i had to extend the wires for the tps (both plugs)

theres a plug with 2 wires going into it

and theres a plug with 3 wires going into it, both for the tps

anyways the computer is telling me there is 0 volts registering on the tps, and when i open the throttle it doesnt change.

however i believe i have extended the wires correctly...

so i got out my multimeter .. pulled the plugs off and tested it... the 3 wire plug gave me 5.12V incomming from the loom with ignition on

and the 2 wire plug gave me 11.96V incomming from the loom with ignition on

are these values correct? if so does this mean my tps is stuffed? and why is the computer reading 0 volts when my multimeter is reading 11.96v and 5.12v?

could really do with some help guys... thanks

The 5v is the power feed ot the tps. You need to measure the voltage at the other two wires in the three pin plug, ome should be 0v(earth) and the other should be the signal, 0-5v depending on the throttle position. The 12v is an idle switch.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...