Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

there would not be a factory car anywhere this side of 1950s russia that is painted in acrylic. unless it's being painted in someones backyard.

u might be surprised that my dads torana (76 model) was acrylic & my other car (rover) 82 model is also acrylic, unless i misunderstood your response :/

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Indicative price on how much this work would cost from Detroit?

edit: Nice work on the front guards. The finish is fantastic, but it doesn't look like they pumped up the rear enough. The outer rim of the wheel is still a good 1cm past the guard.

Indicative price on how much this work would cost from Detroit?

edit: Nice work on the front guards. The finish is fantastic, but it doesn't look like they pumped up the rear enough. The outer rim of the wheel is still a good 1cm past the guard.

in real life it looks much better as for the rear i love it

as for price you would have to call them cos i have no idea as it was part of my sponsorship.

in real life it looks much better as for the rear i love it

as for price you would have to call them cos i have no idea as it was part of my sponsorship.

Okay, no probs...

How long did the process from drop off to pickup?

Okay, no probs...

How long did the process from drop off to pickup?

because there was no rush to do it and they have tones of cars waiting for there godly touch it was about 2 and half weeks

because there was no rush to do it and they have tones of cars waiting for there godly touch it was about 2 and half weeks

Not too bad at all... I might be employing their services in the near future :)

Issue 107 champ, (PMR33)? neat car. how much for rims? i want them in black

Cam

thats someone eles my car comes out in 4-5 months in hpi

the rims are about $3500

http://www.hookupshop.com/Blitz%20rims.htm

Edited by WARLORD

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...