Jump to content
SAU Community

Help Please On 32 Gtr Engine Or Turbos

foney

By foney,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

foney Community Regular

foney

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have read 90% of all posts and have found nothing that matches,

Background,

Last week i recieved a bad batch of fuel, car ran ruff and got to a point where it didnt start, lots of smoke.

I did a complete drain of the tank, pulled out the fuel pump, flushed the fuel lines and the fuel filter then cranked it over a few times to clear any remainng fuel.. put in about 20lts of fresh BP ulitimate as i mannaged to get it running again like normal with boost. Drove to station and got some injector cleaner and drove aroun for 10 minutes, seemed to run ok but kinda still a lil ruff paked it up and left it for the night,

The next day i tried to start it again and it now runs again like it did before with the bad fuel, ruff idle lots of black smoke, tried to take it for a drive no luck.

stalls and runns ruff and i also then found a noise comming from the intake pipe from the rear turbo, comming out of the airflow meter loude wistle/sucking noise after a lil throttle, massive smell of fumes etc. I had the pods off at this stage.

I have newly installed Z32s as well,

Im thinking i have F ucked the rear turbo, dunno how, or its a pipe which ive inspected everywhere..

If the turbo was gone then it would still idle corect?

Im lost and alil upset, Cheers guys any help would be good.

Edited by foney
R.3.2.G.T.R Grand Master

R.3.2.G.T.R

Posted
Posted

umm maybe turbo oil seal has gone, however i remember when my rear turbo zorst wheel let go, i didnt have any hunting, idling etc issues, only boost would get +ve boost.. i assume you didnt hear it go bang.. perhaps check cat for remains of rear exhaust wheel to confirm..

femno Grand Master

femno

Posted
Posted

Youre not making alot of sense.

When you say running rough, is it a rich rough or a missing rough?

White? Blue? Black smoke?

If you make these clear we can help diagnose.

You will always have a little bit of oil in your rear turbo, thats where all your blow-by goes so its not necessarily blown.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      RB20DE NEO smallbox clutch.

      By Kapr · Posted

      For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...