Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G'day I am new to this forum, so go easy on me.

I am after some general pro's and con's for the 1995/96 r33 gts25t and 1990/91 twin turbo 300zx. I am in the market to buy either one of these and given that I will be spending my life savings I want to make the right choice.

Main queries:

1) Running costs - repairs, parts prices etc

2) Performance - which is quicker, handles better

3) Mods - is one more expensive to do up than the other

4) Price - what should I pay for an un-modififed version of each.

All input will be much appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/
Share on other sites

I was told by a mechanic once that the 300zx is a b14tch to work on, the engine is a mess and takes ages to do simple maintenace.

And someone else told me that the 300zx was just made for the USA market, nothing really special, BUT, i've never been in one so dont listen to me :P

Get a GTS-T, i've had mine for 6+ months, had no dramas at all. I think the Series II, 1996+ looks much nicer too, inside and out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-538532
Share on other sites

1) Running costs - repairs, parts prices etc

skyline is heaps cheaper due to more space in engine space, more line on the road also means easy to get parts

2) Performance - which is quicker, handles better

stock 300zx is faster, skyline handle better

3) Mods - is one more expensive to do up than the other

skyline will be more respone to the mod, 300zx get over heat specially after mod due to the engine bay design, not really good for heavy mod

4) Price - what should I pay for an un-modififed version of each.

better check trading post or the for sale section

good luck :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-538555
Share on other sites

I've always wanted a 300zx, don't know why really....possibly because I had never heard of a skyline until recently.

I am reading up on them now.....very impressive stats.

Most friends have pushed me towards the skyline, maybe you're all onto something.

wanna spend about 20K, bit less preferably. Is that enough for one that's in pretty good nik (and not too many K's on the clock).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-538558
Share on other sites

Are there any inherernt faults within the r33 range?

I am particularly interested in the 95/96 r33.

Just want to make sure I know what to look out for when I go out shopping for my dream car.

Anyone with a car of this era for sale, please let me know.

Ready to buy!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-540107
Share on other sites

Was in the same position not long ago until I bought my Skyline.

Test drive both, I find private sellers are easier to convince to do that. BUT, pop the bonnet on both and have a look. I know nothing about engine maintenance (maybe topping up the water for the wipers...oh and the fuel) but crickey! The 300ZX is absolutely chocka block. Definately look at both though and make your own decision on what YOU like. I Luuuurrrrv my Skyline :P

Nearly had an accident test driving a 300ZX .. hehe

Almost right up the butt of some slow wagon, the owner goes..and I quote.. "LOOK OUT !". I was shaking form the experience and still laugh about it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-540368
Share on other sites

Don't forget the practical aspects - most 300ZX's here only have 1 passenger seat. The 4 seater ones are also pretty cramped in the back. But having a 2 seater is a good excuse to not have to act as a taxi to your friends :rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-540525
Share on other sites

Main queries:

1) Running costs - repairs, parts prices etc

skyline cheaper.. single turbo, less weight, 2.5 instead of 3.0 engine, more of them around for parts, engine access is easy for repairs.

2) Performance - which is quicker, handles better

300zx is faster in straight line.

skyline will handle better being lighter and all.

3) Mods - is one more expensive to do up than the other

yes. 300zx is a V6.

meaning it has 2 3cyliner blocks.

each side has it's own air filter, air flow meter,turbo, intercooler, throttle body, manifold, blow off valve, exhaust.

so when you want to do mods like air filter and exhaust, it costs double because you have to get 2 of each.

4) Price - what should I pay for an un-modififed version of each.

95-96 R33 skyline will be from $19K - $25K

90-92 300ZX I've seen from $15K - $30K

Also, the thing that everyone knows about the 300zx is the heat issue.

the engine bay is so packed out that there is NO room for air to escape really so in a 13 year old car, you are bound to have cracked or split hoses and so on.

and replacing the little ones in the back of the engine is no easy job.

If you do get a 300zx, make sure that the RADIATOR and all associated hoses and fans are the first things that are checked/replaced.

the other thing is that MANY mechanics will simply NOT take the job for repairs on the 300ZX's...

You said "I am in the market to buy either one of these and given that I will be spending my life savings I want to make the right choice. "

I say, if you get the 300zx, you WILL be spending that on this car..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-540811
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Not knowing too much about the skyline i'm coming from a biased view, however you should choose to do what is practical for you! Yes being a zed owner i can say that it is expensive for parts mostly because if u can't get them second hand they need to be imported from jap. (pain in the butt). Having owned my tt zed for 2 years now, regular maintenance aside, i've only spent about $1500 on repairs, mainly a new heater core. Regarding issues on repairs the timing belt to get repaired doesn't need the engine out and the little bypass hoses are a pain to fix. Therefore if you choose the z be prepared to put a little aside for hidden problems. Thats my view anyway, either would be a good car but think what u need it for. Happy driving.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-848914
Share on other sites

A friend of mine (Barry) watched his beloved Zed burn to the ground on the roadside just south of Byron Bay (drove from Syd). So, yes - they are well & truly prone to overheating issues.

Having said that, Boosted Zed regularly flogs his on NSW tracks & records some very impressive times. He also knows Skylines inside out. I would suggest you chat with him & determine your best & worst case scenarios before drawing any conclusions.

Ummmkay ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-849018
Share on other sites

skyline = sports version of a family car

300zx = expensive grand tourer (sort of like a japanese 928)

the latter is aimed at someone with deeper pockets. its faster, heavier & more thirsty. feels like a giant go-kart to drive due to its low centre of gravity & wide track/short wheelbase layout

if you clock up 200+km a week i'd suggest the skyline mainly because i think it would be less trouble/expense in the long run.

go & talk to UAS at castle hill. they usually have a range of both in stock and opinions based on a lot of experience

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-849192
Share on other sites

As someone mentioned, u wouldnt really wanna spend 16 to 18k on a 11 to 12 yer old car when u can get something around 8 yrs old for about 23 - 25k...

the skyline is A better car all round with heaps of potential........Z32, parts alot harder to get, coolong probs, and much more expensive to run.......i personally couldnt go past the 96 skyline myself.........

Cheers!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-849221
Share on other sites

Ive been in the motor industry for 27 years & can remember the first z at the Birmingham motor show, that same year I saw a yellow one in the states and thought wow ! well in those days they were beyond my pocket & as for skylines- you just did not see them in europe, then 3 & half years ago I came to nz & have owned & driven probaly 20 z's & well over 50 skylines THERE IS ABSOLUTLY NO COMPARISON !!!!!!!!!!!!! in my opinion (for what it's worth) the z has poor build quality, rides like crap, has far less tuning options, looked good in 1990 but those looks have just not 'held on' were as look at the bnr32 in comparison, wow that's what 'retro' is all about,it's timeless, look at the 33 coupe 'hard as f*ck, the 34 coupe is even harder,( the sedan is butt ugly),now take a good look at the 89 on z, ha ha ha ha ha, look at the trim they used on the non leather cars -yuk ! why was nobody racing a z around Bathhurst in the early ninty's- I wonder

don't even think about buying a z over a skyline, you are comparing a fine wine with ditch water !

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25354-skyline-vs-300zx/#findComment-852003
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did this end up working? Did you take some pictures?
    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
×
×
  • Create New...