Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Got my track spec (uncomplied) DR30 that i have no time for anymore..

Rebuilt less than 2000kms ago with..

Forged pistons

Machined/Balanced bottom end

Light head work

To4E with external gate and screamer

Big injectors

Motec ECU

Made 200kws on its first tune since rebuild (has more in it)

Fresh Gearbox

Extreme Heavy Duty Puck Clutch

Locked R200

Hydraulic Handbrake

BRIDE drivers seat

Stripped interior (sound deadening, Carpet Etc)

No back seat

6 point bolt in cage

17x8.5 in mesh rims with good tread.

Or random 15/16's depending..

Plenty more but i can't think of anything else at the moment

Email: [email protected] for more info/ pics

Looking for around the $8/9K mark

Only reason for selling i bought a GTR and work has the better of me time wise at the moment.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/253701-eoi-track-spec-dr30/
Share on other sites

NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Dont do it.

Well atleast dont sell it to some retard.

Would be a ball of fun with the T04e..

GT3582's are better!

Bet you will regret selling it after you do, coz it's lots more fun seeing off GTR's in an old classic.

Cheers, D

Funny you should say that. I reckon he's probably selling to as his other toy is a GTR

Any pics of it sliding man?

R30 or S13 coilovers?

I'm not wanting to buy just interested in details!

Would be a ball of fun with the T04e..

I have a couple of pic of it sliding at home i chuck them up later.

It has only ever been to a couple of track days all with out the handbrake.

They are R30 coilovers, came in the car from japan.

NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Dont do it.

Well atleast dont sell it to some retard.

Funny you should say that. I reckon he's probably selling to as his other toy is a GTR

I doubt it will sell anyway josh, But if it did all that cash would go into the GTR which i think would make it pretty fun!

Edited by datto_boy

Yeah the bonnet was to help the airflow, Never tried it out though..

The Rims are AVS model 5's or 6's or something.. ( i have a set of 4 if your interested :P )

Couple more pics..

post-12877-1232707968_thumb.jpg

post-12877-1232708537_thumb.jpg

post-12877-1232708683_thumb.jpg

post-12877-1232708749_thumb.jpg

Edited by datto_boy

I'm looking to build a Targa car so could be interested.

How does it look now as the pics seem to be in various stages of development.

I would need to get it licensed and looking as close to stock as practical to preserve it's "classic" class eligablity

Would be a ball of fun with the T04e..

GT3582's are better!

Bet you will regret selling it after you do, coz it's lots more fun seeing off GTR's in an old classic.

Cheers, D

And twin scroll 3071r's are better again.

I've run a HKS to4e kit on an rb20... I think where the t04e's make power would add to the oldschool factor! :D

cool pics..

Is it able to be complied?

Rust?

I believe it is compliable but would be alot of work.

I'm looking to build a Targa car so could be interested.

How does it look now as the pics seem to be in various stages of development.

I would need to get it licensed and looking as close to stock as practical to preserve it's "classic" class eligablity

It looks fairly stock form the out side just wheels really, It is all white with nice looking 17's on it (and the standard DR30 bonnet not the R30 bonnet)

I've run a HKS to4e kit on an rb20... I think where the t04e's make power would add to the oldschool factor! :(

Old school was the plan for this one which is why i never put my 2540 on it.

Made 200kws on low boost should see 250+ with no dramas at all

  • 5 months later...
  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...