Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Basically i always wanted a 4Door import. I currently drives a 32 gtst, love the car but im tempting to get a 4 door just because i like something different( had 2 coupe and now the 3rd one ), seen some nice pictures of some 4doors such as " Nisskid " and the white one in pix section gtst i think (i love the silver one below). But somewhat i think the 4door really needs a kit or at least some skirts to make it looks good. oh an wheels.

Also cabin wise are the rear roomy at all?

2u57rjp.jpg

180GO20051024223620pslfile1.jpg

post-35-1113745278.jpg

r324door.jpg

i089010308l5vw.jpg

OR

Dans%20R32%20GTS-T%2001.jpg

untitled-6-300x223.jpg

2a4y0rt.jpg

Would like to see what you think about the difference performace wise (drifting/ hill runs etc..) i suppose parts are pretty much the same as the coupe version.

Thanks for your input.

l.b.

Cant speak from experience on an R32 level, but a mate has an R33 4 door, I think you'd be splitting hairs to compare the difference. Its slightly longer, but only by a small amount, around 50mm? Drifting wise, its probably less twitchy. Rear seats are great, we've done a few road trips with a car load it doesnt feel as cramped as the coupes probably because of the larger rear windows. In summary I think they're great although slightly understated compared to the coupes the practicality for a daily is worth it in my opinion. I wouldnt mind finding a GTS4 sedan myself and doing an RB30DET conversion... the AWD and 4 doors would be about the closest youd get to the AUTECH 4 door GTR.

I currently drive 32 sedan (selling it now), I'd say there is no difference in driving feel compared to coupe and sedan.

Sedans are 30-50mm longer from coupe (if memory serves me right!) rear legroom isn't that awesome compared to Stageas, 33, Legnums etc, parts would be bit difficult to get over coupe (from A-pillar to back it's different to coupe it's bit longer and taller than coupe).

I don't see many 32 sedans around (i've seen more Stagea and Legnums than 32 sedan!), if you want to be different, go for it.

I've owned both cars and there isn't really much of a difference in space.

It really depends on what your reasoning is for getting a sedan. If you're just after the fact that it's got 4 doors, then go for it. If you're after more legroom, I'd probably consider other cars like the Chaser, Aristo, Caldina, Stagea, etc. Will definitely get more legroom in these cars than you would in an R32 sedan.

hey mate, the coupe and sedans are actually very similar, basically the only difference is a bit of extra length in the boot behind the rear wheels (around 50mm or so), and a bit more head room, i dont have the pic of the 2 cars dimensions on this computer but imm sure someone does.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
    • 310mm rotors will be avilable from Australia, Japan, and probably a few other places. Nothing for the front can be put on the back.
×
×
  • Create New...