Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Scanners will fix it, its hard work and only do it if you have done lots of customisations that you really need to keep.

The first time you do it its going to take you *forever* to get the right mix of programs, and fresh installs are quick :D

Ye they can work, ive got mine setup on my PC and can work really well...

But for most people its generally gonna be faster to dump stuff to a external/spare hdd and just format up

If you spend more than 2-4hrs trying to fix something it generally would have been faster to format at

getting the pc back to where it was pre-format isnt too hard unless you have a zillion programs... and then, if you did have lots thats probably half the reason its running like a dog!

32 bit o/s addresses 4 gb of ram, including your video card memory.

I'd say your graphics card has 750mb...

64bit FTW

And yeah, +1 reformat/reinstall

yeh it addresses 4gb of ram, and my video card is only 512mb, which means the other 256 is allocated to other crap,

but i still stand that 32 bit vista is robing me of 750mb, i'm sure graphic cards use their own ram, and if it was 64 bit, it would use close to 4gb,

32 bit o/s addresses 4 gb of ram, including your video card memory.

I'd say your graphics card has 750mb...

64bit FTW

Forgot about that, I'm too used to servers where graphics cards are insignificant memory wise :P

Its an unfortunate limitation but 64bit support has been a little slow, I'd recommend trying it these days, as long as your running new software you will be fine.

Just run new versions of software, for example in really new versions of java they implemented pointer "compression" to reduce the 64bit overhead which eliminates one of the minor performance issues with going 64bit in java programs ;)

Its an unfortunate limitation but 64bit support has been a little slow, I'd recommend trying it these days, as long as your running new software you will be fine.

Just run new versions of software, for example in really new versions of java they implemented pointer "compression" to reduce the 64bit overhead which eliminates one of the minor performance issues with going 64bit in java programs :D

Only slow takeup in the windows world. 64 bit processing. Up to 32gb of RAM. And these machines are due for an update.

http://www.apple.com/au/macpro/specs.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...