Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im just wondering how you can get that power with a gt35.. your 850cc injectors must be right on there limmit.

stock valve spings and 30psi? and standard cams. got a dyno sheet so we can have a look?

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's not what I was saying at all. Forget the ET. It's irrelevant. What's a full-weight RB S13 weigh? Not as much as a full-weight Skyline I'd imagine.

My point was that the 128mph doesn't match that car with 600rwhp. That's all.

And dyno figures are about as relevant as post counts.

I love how everyone assumes ideal real world case’s in every single situation. I don’t control dyno calibration. 2 out of 3 where within each other, one was less (lets call the lower one closer to correct) for the sake of this discussion.

Next time I’ll have a rabi over see the dyno :happy:

thats great! so lets see it then? after you get it blessed of course.

See what? a dyno run + Rabi? I’m not actually arguing over the power being right or wrong. It ran a 10.8 at 128mph, it made happy power on a machine I do not control. If 128mph means less HP in real world testing, then so be it. What are we all trying to prove here?

AFAIK the guy I sold it to now runs an auto, keep an eye out at Willow Bank I guess :happy:

And dyno figures are about as relevant as post counts.

I love how everyone assumes ideal real world case’s in every single situation. I don’t control dyno calibration. 2 out of 3 where within each other, one was less (lets call the lower one closer to correct) for the sake of this discussion.

Next time I’ll have a rabi over see the dyno :happy:

All good mate. I believe that your car made 600 and that it ran 128mph. I was just suggesting that the mph doesn't support the dyno.

All good mate. I believe that your car made 600 and that it ran 128mph. I was just suggesting that the mph doesn't support the dyno.

And Ive been suggesting like 90% of dynos its probably incorrect. I thought this was about old mate saying my mph didnt match up with the ¼ mile time, not mph matching up with dyno print off.

2rismo is right.. that mph does not match the time.

jesus what a way to jack my thread..... yea i know your messing antony still not cool though, i always though my car had 640 crank hp back when i ran at 29 psi with 3 degress less timing i put the timing and the extra pound and it did feel like a 30+hp gain, and as for the dyno its a brand new mustang dyno its 1 of the lowest reading dyno's in the us its nick name is the heart breaker..... my freinds gt4092r talon at 38 pounds of boost dyno'd 571 awhp ... normal?? i just dont like it when people think thier stuff is better or more right then some 1 elses just cause of where they live or got it from.... ill get the sheet for you in about 30 mins when i get to the dyno

CYA haters.....

jesus what a way to jack my thread..... yea i know your messing antony still not cool though, i always though my car had 640 crank hp back when i ran at 29 psi with 3 degress less timing i put the timing and the extra pound and it did feel like a 30+hp gain, and as for the dyno its a brand new mustang dyno its 1 of the lowest reading dyno's in the us its nick name is the heart breaker..... my freinds gt4092r talon at 38 pounds of boost dyno'd 571 awhp ... normal?? i just dont like it when people think thier stuff is better or more right then some 1 elses just cause of where they live or got it from.... ill get the sheet for you in about 30 mins when i get to the dyno

CYA haters.....

come on mate.. we aint haters.. we just have different horsepower / kw then you do. Your MPH is about the same as mine and i had only 374kw at the wheels on a proper prepped track.. the MPH tells all.

Your car may have that much hp over there, but over here its a different ball game with different dyno's... we often hear bogus power figures come out of the US that we cannot work out how.. we have the most support - more parts cheaper available to us then anyone else around the world and we been playing with imports longer then anyone else so its not because we do not know what we are doing. Its just the readings that are different.

So tell me how did you go in Chille?

come on mate.. we aint haters.. we just have different horsepower / kw then you do. Your MPH is about the same as mine and i had only 374kw at the wheels on a proper prepped track.. the MPH tells all.

Your car may have that much hp over there, but over here its a different ball game with different dyno's... we often hear bogus power figures come out of the US that we cannot work out how.. we have the most support - more parts cheaper available to us then anyone else around the world and we been playing with imports longer then anyone else so its not because we do not know what we are doing. Its just the readings that are different.

So tell me how did you go in Chille?

thats bs man bring your car 2.5 vs 3.0 pump vs pump ill smoke you, i have 50 hp more then that time i raced and you forgeting the weight diference between our cars and drivers and i dont care if you invented the damn engine dont mean my numbers are bogus

thats bs man bring your car 2.5 vs 3.0 pump vs pump ill smoke you, i have 50 hp more then that time i raced and you forgeting the weight diference between our cars and drivers and i dont care if you invented the damn engine dont mean my numbers are bogus

when you get a low low 10sec quarter and 140ish mph then it will seem more realistic.

when you get a low low 10sec quarter and 140ish mph then it will seem more realistic.

I've been waiting for someone to say that guilt man. Forget the et if his track is as dusty and shitty as he says then its unlikely he'll get the times. The mph is the litnus test tho. 130 doesnt cut the mustard.

No doubt its a tuff car and good luck to the owner/builder but unless the strip is on a 45 degree uphill slope those numbers simply do not equate to 600 plus hp.

when you get a low low 10sec quarter and 140ish mph then it will seem more realistic.

when your looking at my rear lights it will seema little more realistic also, btw the mustang dyno was designed in australia and mustang dyno's software and formulas are made and written in australia

And I’ve been suggesting like 90% of dyno’s it’s probably incorrect. I thought this was about old mate saying my mph didn’t match up with the ¼ mile time, not mph matching up with dyno print off.

100% mate. I was disagreeing with GT and clarifying my point. We're on the same page :-)

I've been waiting for someone to say that guilt man. Forget the et if his track is as dusty and shitty as he says then its unlikely he'll get the times. The mph is the litnus test tho. 130 doesnt cut the mustard.

No doubt its a tuff car and good luck to the owner/builder but unless the strip is on a 45 degree uphill slope those numbers simply do not equate to 600 plus hp.

not good with the whole reading thing are we i ran the 132 trap back when the car had 50 hp less less boost and less timing and my car weighs 1580 kilos with driver

Look Raegan, no one is denying your setup is tough, you have the quickest car in your class in your country and you do it all yourself which is friggin awesome. Its a great credit to you and whoever helped you.

What happened in Chille? post up pics!!! post up dyno sheet as well

and as for you floggin my car... Everyone talked it up and said that to me has learnt the hard way.. besides i am over drag racing i don't even think i will drag race it again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...