Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im just wondering how you can get that power with a gt35.. your 850cc injectors must be right on there limmit.

stock valve spings and 30psi? and standard cams. got a dyno sheet so we can have a look?

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That's not what I was saying at all. Forget the ET. It's irrelevant. What's a full-weight RB S13 weigh? Not as much as a full-weight Skyline I'd imagine.

My point was that the 128mph doesn't match that car with 600rwhp. That's all.

And dyno figures are about as relevant as post counts.

I love how everyone assumes ideal real world case’s in every single situation. I don’t control dyno calibration. 2 out of 3 where within each other, one was less (lets call the lower one closer to correct) for the sake of this discussion.

Next time I’ll have a rabi over see the dyno :happy:

thats great! so lets see it then? after you get it blessed of course.

See what? a dyno run + Rabi? I’m not actually arguing over the power being right or wrong. It ran a 10.8 at 128mph, it made happy power on a machine I do not control. If 128mph means less HP in real world testing, then so be it. What are we all trying to prove here?

AFAIK the guy I sold it to now runs an auto, keep an eye out at Willow Bank I guess :happy:

And dyno figures are about as relevant as post counts.

I love how everyone assumes ideal real world case’s in every single situation. I don’t control dyno calibration. 2 out of 3 where within each other, one was less (lets call the lower one closer to correct) for the sake of this discussion.

Next time I’ll have a rabi over see the dyno :happy:

All good mate. I believe that your car made 600 and that it ran 128mph. I was just suggesting that the mph doesn't support the dyno.

All good mate. I believe that your car made 600 and that it ran 128mph. I was just suggesting that the mph doesn't support the dyno.

And Ive been suggesting like 90% of dynos its probably incorrect. I thought this was about old mate saying my mph didnt match up with the ¼ mile time, not mph matching up with dyno print off.

2rismo is right.. that mph does not match the time.

jesus what a way to jack my thread..... yea i know your messing antony still not cool though, i always though my car had 640 crank hp back when i ran at 29 psi with 3 degress less timing i put the timing and the extra pound and it did feel like a 30+hp gain, and as for the dyno its a brand new mustang dyno its 1 of the lowest reading dyno's in the us its nick name is the heart breaker..... my freinds gt4092r talon at 38 pounds of boost dyno'd 571 awhp ... normal?? i just dont like it when people think thier stuff is better or more right then some 1 elses just cause of where they live or got it from.... ill get the sheet for you in about 30 mins when i get to the dyno

CYA haters.....

jesus what a way to jack my thread..... yea i know your messing antony still not cool though, i always though my car had 640 crank hp back when i ran at 29 psi with 3 degress less timing i put the timing and the extra pound and it did feel like a 30+hp gain, and as for the dyno its a brand new mustang dyno its 1 of the lowest reading dyno's in the us its nick name is the heart breaker..... my freinds gt4092r talon at 38 pounds of boost dyno'd 571 awhp ... normal?? i just dont like it when people think thier stuff is better or more right then some 1 elses just cause of where they live or got it from.... ill get the sheet for you in about 30 mins when i get to the dyno

CYA haters.....

come on mate.. we aint haters.. we just have different horsepower / kw then you do. Your MPH is about the same as mine and i had only 374kw at the wheels on a proper prepped track.. the MPH tells all.

Your car may have that much hp over there, but over here its a different ball game with different dyno's... we often hear bogus power figures come out of the US that we cannot work out how.. we have the most support - more parts cheaper available to us then anyone else around the world and we been playing with imports longer then anyone else so its not because we do not know what we are doing. Its just the readings that are different.

So tell me how did you go in Chille?

come on mate.. we aint haters.. we just have different horsepower / kw then you do. Your MPH is about the same as mine and i had only 374kw at the wheels on a proper prepped track.. the MPH tells all.

Your car may have that much hp over there, but over here its a different ball game with different dyno's... we often hear bogus power figures come out of the US that we cannot work out how.. we have the most support - more parts cheaper available to us then anyone else around the world and we been playing with imports longer then anyone else so its not because we do not know what we are doing. Its just the readings that are different.

So tell me how did you go in Chille?

thats bs man bring your car 2.5 vs 3.0 pump vs pump ill smoke you, i have 50 hp more then that time i raced and you forgeting the weight diference between our cars and drivers and i dont care if you invented the damn engine dont mean my numbers are bogus

thats bs man bring your car 2.5 vs 3.0 pump vs pump ill smoke you, i have 50 hp more then that time i raced and you forgeting the weight diference between our cars and drivers and i dont care if you invented the damn engine dont mean my numbers are bogus

when you get a low low 10sec quarter and 140ish mph then it will seem more realistic.

when you get a low low 10sec quarter and 140ish mph then it will seem more realistic.

I've been waiting for someone to say that guilt man. Forget the et if his track is as dusty and shitty as he says then its unlikely he'll get the times. The mph is the litnus test tho. 130 doesnt cut the mustard.

No doubt its a tuff car and good luck to the owner/builder but unless the strip is on a 45 degree uphill slope those numbers simply do not equate to 600 plus hp.

when you get a low low 10sec quarter and 140ish mph then it will seem more realistic.

when your looking at my rear lights it will seema little more realistic also, btw the mustang dyno was designed in australia and mustang dyno's software and formulas are made and written in australia

And I’ve been suggesting like 90% of dyno’s it’s probably incorrect. I thought this was about old mate saying my mph didn’t match up with the ¼ mile time, not mph matching up with dyno print off.

100% mate. I was disagreeing with GT and clarifying my point. We're on the same page :-)

I've been waiting for someone to say that guilt man. Forget the et if his track is as dusty and shitty as he says then its unlikely he'll get the times. The mph is the litnus test tho. 130 doesnt cut the mustard.

No doubt its a tuff car and good luck to the owner/builder but unless the strip is on a 45 degree uphill slope those numbers simply do not equate to 600 plus hp.

not good with the whole reading thing are we i ran the 132 trap back when the car had 50 hp less less boost and less timing and my car weighs 1580 kilos with driver

Look Raegan, no one is denying your setup is tough, you have the quickest car in your class in your country and you do it all yourself which is friggin awesome. Its a great credit to you and whoever helped you.

What happened in Chille? post up pics!!! post up dyno sheet as well

and as for you floggin my car... Everyone talked it up and said that to me has learnt the hard way.. besides i am over drag racing i don't even think i will drag race it again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...