Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah but there's no SDU style colour scheme. I'd like to try give these forums a visual make-over sometime soon, perhaps i'll speak to prank about it. Custom menu up the top, new buttons, new colours, etc. Need's a bit more customisation imo. :)

PranK give us a yell on MSN later on when you get home. Do you know the code for the rotation thingo? If not ill have a look thru my notes for it or something.

I'm willing to spend a heap of time making the forums good :cool:

yeah but the design layout isn't the best

If you want to see progress on what i'm working on - USER CP>USER OPTIONS>STYLE SET> and select TEST.

I'm going to make one which is same colours as SDU, just give me time. It means i have to make new buttons, and all that kinda stuff, remember.

:cool:

It won't be 100% SDU Style, but similar. I've also added a few other custom touches - such as the PM's up the top of the forum and the side bits on threads are different - the user info is centered. Looks much neater IMO. still playing around with a few things. such as MSN, ICQ, AIM buttons down the bottom of posts where the PROFILE, WWW. etc. things are.

Well, once i complete it. There's about hmm, 50 buttons i have to do, a new header up the top, plus about 10 customised template pages (just a bunch of code i gotta fiddle with).

I'll get to it now and have it up in a couple hours eh..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...