Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry A i may have miss read AMperformance makes a High Flow cat out of ceramic 200cell 4" body with 3" mouth awesome bit of kit $360 standalone or i think $250 with a dump pipe which is $360 for a SS split dump

Sorry A i may have miss read AMperformance makes a High Flow cat out of ceramic 200cell 4" body with 3" mouth awesome bit of kit $360 standalone or i think $250 with a dump pipe which is $360 for a SS split dump

Its kool man, ok well i got a dump pipe already, picked up split stainless steel one for 160. but that sounds good. Is there realli any difference between a metal and ceramic. i saw this one on ebay

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...E:X:RTQ:AU:1123

let me knwo wat you think apparently its flow is 550

your all leading him up the garden path....

refer post #9

then use post #2

and problem solved.

if your missues wont let you i have a $400 metal cat with very low kays ready to bolt on for $150

flows over 700cfm, best you can buy

pm me if your keen

Don't want to hijack the thread but does anyone have one of Am Performance's Split Dump front pipes?

If so, are they better value than the cheaper JJR ones sold in the trader section?

you cant compare the quality picture for picture they look the same but look @ the metals used and you will know Andrew only uses quality australian stainless not the cheap chinese rubbish

all flanges are stainless as well not like jjr dumps

Andrew is local so...

1) your supporting local business

2) if something is a miss then you can ring him and he will fix it till your happy

better value is hard to put a short term price on is $360 better value than $200 in the short term a lot of people would say no

i however say yes, and im not the only one but you (being anyone) need to make your own mind up

Or you could grab a 33 GTR factory metal cat, run one in mine, bout $100 from a compliance place. Good flow too!

ive said that basically everytime a cat converter thread has popped up.

1. go to compliance workshop.

2. purchase factory GTR cat.

3. ????

4. profit.

basically, gtr cats are win, and they cost f**k all as theyre normally binned when GTR's are complied.

Edited by scandyflick
you cant compare the quality picture for picture they look the same but look @ the metals used and you will know Andrew only uses quality australian stainless not the cheap chinese rubbish

all flanges are stainless as well not like jjr dumps

Andrew is local so...

1) your supporting local business

2) if something is a miss then you can ring him and he will fix it till your happy

better value is hard to put a short term price on is $360 better value than $200 in the short term a lot of people would say no

i however say yes, and im not the only one but you (being anyone) need to make your own mind up

Cheers. If it's built better and from better materials then in my book that's better value even at $360

ive said that basically everytime a cat converter thread has popped up.

1. go to compliance workshop.

2. purchase factory GTR cat.

3. ????

4. profit.

basically, gtr cats are win, and they cost f**k all as theyre normally binned when GTR's are complied.

Dave is correct, only prob is trying to find an original GTR Cat cause all the ones you see that are complianced and stock standard have an aftermarket crappy one on them.

Like Dave said, go to an import house that does compliancing and start sifting thru their bins like a homeless person.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...