Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Cheers for that, I thought it was 2 speed.

Hopefully dirt can get some pix and info on the th400 he knows of.

Rob

Ive arranged a viewing of the car and a meeting with the owner this Saturday...will confirm all i can for you guys.

GIVE ME MY NUMBER PLATE BACK!!!!!

Its a nugget

thats right u heard me!!!!!!!!!!

wait till the 34 is complete sure i wont have 553kw@all fours but trust me ur gonna have a hard time shaking me off!!!

PS- NUGGET!!!!

GIVE ME MY NUMBER PLATE BACK!!!!!

Its a nugget

thats right u heard me!!!!!!!!!!

wait till the 34 is complete sure i wont have 553kw@all fours but trust me ur gonna have a hard time shaking me off!!!

PS- NUGGET!!!!

lol ol' GTR32X....you will leave them up for grabs...lol

GIVE ME MY NUMBER PLATE BACK!!!!!

Its a nugget

thats right u heard me!!!!!!!!!!

wait till the 34 is complete sure i wont have 553kw@all fours but trust me ur gonna have a hard time shaking me off!!!

PS- NUGGET!!!!

You Serious,

Both your cars are nuggets ..............

No he just fu*#ed up and sold me the car and now he has a tomy kiarra r34 bang up and hes not happy cause its a nugget lol hahahahahahahahahaha

see you tommorow night and we will see whos cars a nugget :ermm:

No he just fu*#ed up and sold me the car and now he has a tomy kiarra r34 bang up and hes not happy cause its a nugget lol hahahahahahahahahaha

see you tommorow night and we will see whos cars a nugget :ermm:

freaky friday ANDRA runs?

Not yet going for a cruise tommorow night.

Wuss you can shove your plates when the NUGGET runs a 9 then i can put my rh9gtr plates on or you can have them if your shit box runs a 9 first lol lol

good to see someone at least waiting to see if the car will at least run a 9 before putting rh9 plates on...lol

his car makes full boost by 5000rpm and pulls hard till 9000.

how can that not be fun?

my mate runs a gt3540 rb30 on his r34 and makes full boost by 3900 and pulls to 7000.

he makes around 350rwkw. and has yet to even lose to anything on the street. and trsut me 20psi by 4000rpm is f*kn responsive on a big turbo like that.

we both know there are alot more serious cars out there.

but with a AWD system and full boot by 5000rpm. and making over 5000kw.

thats more fun then dreamworld

your profile says u own a r33 gtst....what stock twins are you talking about?

stock GTRs make full boost by 2500rpm but make like 250awk.......which is f*k all and isnt all that fast.

i can tell youve never been in anything other then your standard 2.5 or 2.6 skyline. this guys running a rb30 which will cause less lag and even more power. i dont think you know what lag is boy

I am sorry, i should update that. I don't an RB26 GTST 33 anymore i have a 33 GTR thanks. I have been in an R32 GTR that makes near 600awhp through low mount trust twins and 2.7 litre stroker engine, mind you its set up for circuit but is an absolute weapon on the street, i'd prefer that over a monster single turbo to be honest.

In saying that i want a GT3540 .86 or .84 rear housing, as all i want is around 350awkw and that turbo will still be somewhat responsive and useable on the street

Just my 2 cents, its not always about size....

haha thats true, i have been in a mates GT3540 equipped and still 2.6l with mild poncams and it was rediculous very responsive and revved to 8000rpm like a dream... also squeezed 390awkw out of it to... to bad he didn't have a surge tank as it used to hit fuel surge on every launch lol this is why it is getting another rebuild...

I am sorry, i should update that. I don't an RB26 GTST 33 anymore i have a 33 GTR thanks. I have been in an R32 GTR that makes near 600awhp through low mount trust twins and 2.7 litre stroker engine, mind you its set up for circuit but is an absolute weapon on the street, i'd prefer that over a monster single turbo to be honest.

In saying that i want a GT3540 .86 or .84 rear housing, as all i want is around 350awkw and that turbo will still be somewhat responsive and useable on the street

Just my 2 cents, its not always about size....

id prefer my low-mounts over a single anyday as well...but low-mounts restrict top-end power needed to run the times im after. When i achieve what im gunning for im not ruling out going back to the GT-RS's and even a larger capacity bottom end...did i just type that?...a larger capacity bottom end...yes i did...the Mark Berry low-mount record is in some danger when i get the low-mounts back on. Im building up the engine for it now so it may be a simple engine swap and im away. Leaving the high mount set-up there if i feel the need to go back to it. Ahh the luxury of being able to build your own race engines is a good one.

I am not againts a big single and favour twin low mounts as i think both are very capable in certain areas, the main reason i am looking at ditching the stock twins and go the GT3540 is the fact that yes it will still be relatively responsive, it will do the power i am after and it will simplify all the underbody maintenance on the turbo side, i have ripped off my stock twins in my old car and it was an absolute pain in the ass, definately down the track when it comes time for a rebuild i will be looking at a 30 bottom end and a T04Z as thats a lethal combo in any language

I am not againts a big single and favour twin low mounts as i think both are very capable in certain areas, the main reason i am looking at ditching the stock twins and go the GT3540 is the fact that yes it will still be relatively responsive, it will do the power i am after and it will simplify all the underbody maintenance on the turbo side, i have ripped off my stock twins in my old car and it was an absolute pain in the ass, definately down the track when it comes time for a rebuild i will be looking at a 30 bottom end and a T04Z as thats a lethal combo in any language

we overlayed our circuit cars dyno chart with both power and torque against the GT-RS's on the drag car and you would swear it was the same car.

The low mounts at 22psi and the T04Z at 24psi...same power but the low-mounts power was made a little earlier and held on for longer...same with the torque...both are HKS powered cars but the circuit car was on Sunoco and the drag car was on BP98.

Edited by DiRTgarage

Hmm thats very interesting actually, I wouldn't go a T04Z if i was staying 2.6l but if i do want more down the track and i do go a 30 bottom end it will be the only turbo i will have on there

Have seen some very impressive results from those combo's interms of response and awesome torque

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...