Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm personally feeling sorry for Rod these days. He's copped it far too hard I reckon. Who knows where his head was at 3s after going from 100-0km/hr in <1s.

Anyhoo....

And Ben - we were running 550's in ours and I reckon they are pretty well bang on.

  • Replies 652
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I'm personally feeling sorry for Rod these days. He's copped it far too hard I reckon. Who knows where his head was at 3s after going from 100-0km/hr in <1s.

I hear you. Everyone makes a mistake at some time, and it's my personal opinion that what goes on in the car, stays in the car.

I have a theory, and it may be a weak one, that when Rod was saying"where was the f**king chicane call?", he wasn't so much asking Sammy as asking himself, like, where was it in his brain and why did he miss it? It's only a theory, mainly because I could hear myself asking myself the same question out loud if in a similar situation.

Regardless, the first question after a hit like that should be "are you ok?".

2. I definately would have got off the brakes and just hit the chicane. Hitting a chicane isn't the end of the world, flat spotting all four tyres and going hard into the scenery is. Check out the skid marks in Sav's video at 3:34!

I thought it would be interesting to have a look at our footage, to listen to the calls as well. Now, Timmy might like to chime in here as well, but I reckon that if I hadn't been watching for the chicane distance markers we would have gone strait through them...... as it was we were pretty close to the braking limit, as the call was "keep right over crest straight, 80, chicane".

I'll upload the vid for you to judge.

Really? 330.... in a GTR?!?! Are you sure? I ran harder than that in the gts. Must have ridden nice before! lol

314 actually, i measured them up to help a mate set his car up leading upto 08. 314 f 208 r. I checked it on 3-4 different calculators at the time, cause i thought it was way to soft number.

how heavy is your car snowy? ours was 1608 fully fueled, spare tyre, and the other crap you have to carry.

314 actually, i measured them up to help a mate set his car up leading upto 08. 314 f 208 r. I checked it on 3-4 different calculators at the time, cause i thought it was way to soft number.

how heavy is your car snowy? ours was 1608 fully fueled, spare tyre, and the other crap you have to carry.

Mine weigh in at 1658kgs half full with fuel

not the lightest in the field

I hear you. Everyone makes a mistake at some time, and it's my personal opinion that what goes on in the car, stays in the car.

I have a theory, and it may be a weak one, that when Rod was saying"where was the f**king chicane call?", he wasn't so much asking Sammy as asking himself, like, where was it in his brain and why did he miss it? It's only a theory, mainly because I could hear myself asking myself the same question out loud if in a similar situation.

Regardless, the first question after a hit like that should be "are you ok?".

2. I definately would have got off the brakes and just hit the chicane. Hitting a chicane isn't the end of the world, flat spotting all four tyres and going hard into the scenery is. Check out the skid marks in Sav's video at 3:34!

I thought it was interesting that Rod actually let that footage leave the car in the first place.

Don't know what he was thinking but I do know he's copping a caning across the interweb for it now though!

While the 'are you ok?' question is the first thing that should be asked, people sometimes say and do innappropriate things when in shock. I'd be pissed off if the first thing I heard after a crash like that was blame, but then I'd like to think I could be level headed enough to let it go and have a proper conversation about it (or a punch up ;) ) when things had settled.

I thought it would be interesting to have a look at our footage, to listen to the calls as well. Now, Timmy might like to chime in here as well, but I reckon that if I hadn't been watching for the chicane distance markers we would have gone strait through them...... as it was we were pretty close to the braking limit, as the call was "keep right over crest straight, 80, chicane".

I'll upload the vid for you to judge.

It's easy to see why many were caught out (or almost caught out) by that particular chicane. I think drivers are perhaps just too used to them being placed in the middle of long, fast straights with good visability.

Regardless, the signs were there, and people's notes should have reflected the crest and short distance to chicane after it?

I am pretty sure it was cautioned in our notes (from memory, any with limited visibility were) - that said I think we went into it a little quicker than I think Steve would have liked.

Footage...They would have signed stat dec like us all to say the event owns the footage.

Signs.. notes brain fade, I dunno motorsport incident. The guy had an off the previous year, so maybe there is a pattern, or maybe he is trying hard and making the odd error.

"Trying hard enough to win - Trying hard enough to crash!"

I biffed my partner into the bank at sheffield in 04. I think it was "Its all over honey - get the triangles... I can imagine someone who has done lots of circuit and had some prangs forgetting there was another in the car.

One thing I cant quite hear - (noisey here) but I think Sam did say "get off it get off it" Now if she was talking about the brakes - marks to her. If she is washing clothes in public - points deducted.

TT984

how heavy is your car snowy? ours was 1608 fully fueled, spare tyre, and the other crap you have to carry.

Mine was 1674 for TT. Because you can add things like DVD players and full surround speakers to the things still in my car! LOL

Very well said Greg.... as bloody usual you silver tongued bastard :)

This is ours, about 3:20 or something I think.

Do you think some drivers don't actually look at athe signs? Or maybe they simply notice the signs but think they're a caution board (you know, with red triangle)? I'm just trying to understand.....

Greg would be familiar, if you're running in a podium position, it's normal for the event cameramen to come and collect your in-car footage at the first opportunity. No questions asked. As Greg said, they own the footage.

Edited by Marlin

I’d still be having a quiet word about that footage not seeing the light of day, deal or no deal …and yes, I am a little naïve sometimes, still believe in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and a world where producers don’t select content for sensationalism :)

I know we sign away everything when we run cameras in the car, but as Ben has said some things should stay in the car. That incident, and the discussions which have followed, to do not make anyone involved look good IMHO.

Bugger it... here's some more in car ;) lol

Tungahtinah, day 5.... fastest classic

Queenstown... slow as a wet week. No grip man!

Check the grip at 4:05 through 4:15, and again at 4:35.... I got nothin.... The campaign was pretty much over by now :laugh:

And Lowana, leg 4. - I didn't realise how much of a crack we had at this one. 7th outright, and only 6 seconds off Quinny!

coulda binned it, ohhhh, 3 times on this one. Why didn't you say something Timmy!?!?! lol

Edited by Marlin

Crikey I have watched all your videos Ben (which I suppose makes me some sort of sad groupie!) and Lowana is the fastest I have seen you drive. Damn that is commitment, could have gone horribly wrong on that one. I was scratching my head as to how a 32 can match a 996 but yeh, very impressive :P

Bugger it... here's some more in car :yes: lol

And Lowana, leg 4. - I didn't realise how much of a crack we had at this one. 7th outright, and only 6 seconds off Quinny!

coulda binned it, ohhhh, 3 times on this one. Why didn't you say something Timmy!?!?! lol

<sigh> rally withdrawal x 10 after watching :P

Amazing effort especially with Lowana Ben and Timmy- you can see the committment.

Funny thing is I bet you were travelling 5 times faster than that in car reflected- todays cams are very good but still don't really give a sense of how fast or how close!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...