Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

GHEY?! Why come in here, single out sydneykid, ask for his opinion then go ****ing nutz when he doesnt agree with you?

Some people like torquey track suited power

Some people like peakey drag suited power

Its a compromise like everything else in this fun game we play. It doesnt matter what someone else thinks of your dyno graph / quart mile times / turbo / haircut / makeup as long as you enjoy your car.

Becuse Sydneykid has posted several times how bad the TD06 turbo is and even at one point said they are off a truck and only good for a truck, I don't like the fact that he does this and wanted to prove a point, I didn't expect him to agree with me I just don't wan him always saying negative things about something he obviously knows little about

LOL if you were gonna have a go at people who talk about stuff they never even touched you'd run out of breath dude. 90% of the stuff in forums is people replaying other peoples "knowledge" and is wrong half the time anyway, why let it get to ya? If your happy with TD06 then who gives a **** what someone else says about it?

After doing work on my car and posting results i got called a lier by the resident "turbo experts" despite having actually done it when in fact they hadnt *shock horror*

/my 2 cents

Its my impression that the TD06 is perfectly good turbo if you are willing to put up with slightly slower spool. Rebuild costs on a TD06 would probably be a lot cheaper than GTs considering you cant service the GT cores.

Hi guys, I knew this would get interesting, it had a nice lead in didn't it?. Sydneykid "Whats your thoughts on those figures?":D

Oh, OK Buster, you caught me out, the last 1/10th at Eastern Creek is very slightly uphill. But still within legal tack requirements, I understand. People blame EC traction for poor times (even Ben), but he had a faster 60ft at EC than at Heathcote. On some days the lanes can be quite different though.

I think the rev, summed it up pretty well "you where ... making less average power".:innocent:

Buster asked, "What is the HPI R34 to you?" I am a consulting race engineer, suspension is my specialty, although I do driver training, data logging and analysis. So when Ben says he is chasing a faster time with suspension tuning, who do you think ultimately answers the question?

I have stayed involved in this discussion because it is an opportunity to show that a car with around the same average power is just as fast as a car with higher maximum power (even 10% more isn't enough).

I don't think I can achieve any more than I already have.

Originally posted by Sydneykid

Hi guys, I knew this would get interesting, it had a nice lead in didn't it?.  Sydneykid "Whats your thoughts on those figures?":D  

I have stayed involved in this discussion because it is an opportunity to show that a car with around the same average power is just as fast as a car with higher maximum power (even 10% more isn't enough).

I don't think I can achieve any more than I already have.

Please humour me for one more post then as I don't understand the above comment are you talking about my car being the underpowered car as when I ran the 12.2 it was at 280rwkw

I have never ran the car with the 327rwkw for you to know what it can do I posted that I was at low boost a few times in the previous posts and low boost is 280rwkw

Heres the figures I had at low boost with the power fc

4000 = 96rwkw

5000 = 184rwkw

6000 = 232rwkw

7000 = 270rwkw

Average 195rwkw so really I was making a lot less power

They are the exact figures I ran the 12.2 your comparing, The figures I quoted at the start of the thread are with the factory ecu and I haven't ran at the creek when I've had it in yet, To be honest I think I wuill go back to the factory rechipped ecu as I like its power better

Once more....

Buster your lastest figures with a TD06-20G shows a max power of of 270 rwkw with an average of 195 rwkw (from 4,000 rpm to 7,000 rpm). My example with a Garrett GT3040 showed a max of 280 rwkw (3.7% higher) with an average of 223 rwkw (14.4% higher). This is, and always has been, exactly my point.

My experience has been that Trust turbos give good max power, but there are other turbos that give the same max power but deliver higher average power in the rpm range I use. That makes them both faster and easier to drive.

Maybe other peoples experiences have been different, but the world would be a very dull place if everone agreed all the time.

Sorry if I took up your bandwidth.

Once again its a TD06 25g

Could you PM me you mobile number or some way of contacting you please as you didn't answer the above question as to which car you were talking about that was under powered that made you stay in the discussion

Originally posted by Buster

I can get a new td06 25g off Nengun for $2600 delivered

and I just called GCG Turbo's and was quoted $2960 for a Garrett GT3040 so IMO the TD06 is not bad value

And when that GT3040 needs rebuilding what would the cost be compared to the TD06 being rebuilt?

$2,304.50 for GT30 turbo at http://www.horsepowerinabox.com/HPIAB2/cat...ategory26_1.htm

I payed 2300 for a GT35 new from them.

Anyway I do agree with most of what Sydneykid has stated.

Ok I guess the discussion is over but let me point out you chose to not answer any of the questions I asked about what time the HPI R34 ran at EC and which car you were talking about that had less peak power but was as fast

We both know you were talking about one of your cars that kept you in the discussion and has around the same average power but is just as fast as a car with higher maximum power (even 10% more isn't enough) because it was actually my car that had less average and less higher power but managed to be as fast as one of your fully workshop prepped cars you wouldn't like to admit to that though

I guess I will remember this for future discussions if you just choose not to answer any of the questions you can't look bad

As for you point about Trust turbos give good max power, but there are other turbos that give the same max power but deliver higher average power in the rpm range I use. That makes them both faster and easier to drive.

My first power figures from the remapped factory ecu are a lot higher on average and at peak then your GT3040 and has not been used at the creek yet for you to be able to show or know how fast it will be so don't bother picking one RPM and saying but down here because as quoted by you in the 1st post Tell me the average power over the useable rpm range, now that's something meaningful.

So for fun why don't we just say my use able rpm range is 4500- 7500rpm (which it is)

4500 = 176rwkw

5500 = 264rwkw

6500 = 312rwkw

7500 = 327rwkw

Average 269rwkw so peak power and average is a lot better then your beloved GT3040 and I find the car very easy to drive on the street because of the suspension set up and tyres I use, now for how fast it is at the Creek we wont know for a couple of weeks but I'm sure I'll let you know

Fair call about 2nd hand prices, but what i paid in indicative of what you would expect to pay for a 2nd hand TD06-20g setup.

I have seen several others kits advertised at a similar price, some including injectors and/or ECUs and/or AFM and/or BOVs and/or dump pipes and filters.

... and this post isnt intended to be antagonistic, whilst i like Garret/HKS/Apexi BB turbos, i respect the fact the Mitsubishi/Trust turbos can knock out some nice numbers/times/enjoyment

When finally having a long hard look at it, if a plain bearing turbo is good enough for the latest of Evo lancers, then...good enough for me.

Evo lancers still use Mitsubishi turbos (from which Trust are based), though im unsure what model of EVO uses titanium turbines. People seem to he happy with the response and power that the the Evos display.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...