Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm confused, I have seen 256, 260 and 264 described as "Step 1".  Plus I have 264 described as "Step 2".  So I just call them 256, 260 or 264, "Step" is a useless term.

AFAIK, step 1, 2 etc are terms coined by the Japanese for levels of tuning, as in:

Step one HKS inlet cam is 256/8.8, step one exh is 264/9.0. Step one inlet is the only HKS cam you can keep NVCS with.

Step two are higher lift, and larger duration on inlet (264), there fore you can have a 264 step 2 cam.

Thanks Steve, but I'm still confused, help me out here;

If Step 1 means "the biggest cam you can run with VVT", what is Step 1 on an RB20 or an RB26 that don't have VVT?

A 264 on the exhaust is Step 1, but a 264 on the inlet is Step 2. That sounds illogical, am I right? Or is that only RB25's and 264/264 is Step 1 on RB20/26's?

What is a 256 inlet and 260 exhaust, is that Step 1 or 2?

What is a 260 inlet and 264 exhaust, is that Step 1 or 2?

If I have a 264 at 9 mm, that's Step 1 right? But only if it's an exhaust cam, yeh? What if I have a 264 at 9.5 mm, is that still Step 1?

Hang on, if I have 264/264 at 9.15 mm for a GTR that would be Step 1, but the same cams are Step 2 for an RB20. So if I have a GTR with 264/264 I can say they are "Step 2 cams". That can't be right, can it?

It would make more sense if;

Step 1 meant no other mods, just stick the cams in and they will work

Step 2 meant you have to change the valve springs if you fit these cams

Step 3 meant you have to machine the head for nose clearance and change to offset buckets as well as the valve springs if you fit these cams

Step 4 means as well as all of the above, you have to increase the size of the flycuts in the pistons or recess the valves into the head or use a thicker head gasket to use these cams.

Now that would make sense to me.

Thanks Steve, but I'm still confused, help me out here;

If Step 1 means "the biggest cam you can run with VVT", what is Step 1 on an RB20 or an RB26 that don't have VVT?

A 264 on the exhaust is Step 1, but a 264 on the inlet is Step 2.  That sounds illogical, am I right?  Or is that only RB25's and 264/264 is Step 1 on RB20/26's?

What is a 256 inlet and 260 exhaust, is that Step 1 or 2?

What is a 260 inlet and 264 exhaust, is that Step 1 or 2?

If I have a 264 at 9 mm, that's Step 1 right?  But only if it's an exhaust cam, yeh?  What if I have a 264 at 9.5 mm, is that still Step 1?

Hang on, if I have 264/264 at 9.15 mm for a GTR that would be Step 1, but the same cams are Step 2 for an RB20.  So if I have a GTR with 264/264 I can say they are "Step 2 cams".   That can't be right, can it?

It would make more sense if;

Step 1 meant no other mods, just stick the cams in and they will work

Step 2 meant you have to change the valve springs if you fit these cams

Step 3 meant you have to machine the head for nose clearance and change to offset buckets as well as the valve springs if you fit these cams

Step 4 means as well as all of the above, you have to increase the size of the flycuts in the pistons or recess the valves into the head or use a thicker head gasket to use these cams.

Now that would make sense to me.

Hold on a second, I never said step one means "the biggest cam you can run with VVT", please re-read.

The following applies to RB25:

HKS 256 step on inlet cam is the only cam (HKS make) that still allows the use of VVT. Tomei, from memory, make a 260?

HKS refer to different levels of tuning as steps

Step one HKS cams are 256in/8.8, 264ex/9.0

Step two are larger, step three are larger again.

I am pretty sure HKS do a step 2 inlet which is 264, it has a larger lift than the 256, and obviously a longer duration, which would explain your confusion at 264 step on and 264 step 2. I am not as sure, but I believe they also do a 264 exhaust that is similar lift, in that it isnt a direct bolt on.

Different engines have different durations and lift for their steps, obviously.

If you look at a catalogue (which I know you refuse to own;)) they have different levels of tuning. Each sucessive 'step' requires more work, for different levels (or steps) of tuning, and the step 1's are a straight bolt on. The steps were described to me much as you pointed out in the latter part of your post - but I didnt pay alot of attention at the time, as I was after cams that allowed me to use VVT and were a direct fit and kept reasonable idle without the need for vacuum tanks for brakes etc - I didnt look past a direct bolt on, as IMHO, it would be overengineering a car being used for street and light track work.

Does that help?

correct me if Im wrong but doesnt HKS make 256 exhaust Cams for RB25DET? and they state its for NVCS engine. and they dont say anything about 264 exhaust cams working with NVCS.

I know the VVT is only in the inlet cam, so how does that make sense?

would both 256 and 264 exhaust cams bolt on into the head without modification?

I cant understand why they would put up a 256 NVCS cam for exhaust. I was told that they also do a 256 inlet that is for use without NVCS, perhaps they have their wires crossed, and should have 256 in, with and without NVCS instead of a 256 exh with nvcs?

I was told the only HKS cam I can get to run with NVCS is the 256. This was by a friend who rang Japan for me to find out what options I had.

I was under the impression the "step" levels reffered to the amount of lift on the camshaft

For example

HKS Step 1 camshafts are all 8.7mm lift

HKS Step 2 264 in/ex camshafts are 10.0mm lift

HKS Step 2 272/280 in/ex camshafts are 10.2mm lift

This applies to the RB26DETT, HKS dont seem to list "Step" options for the RB25DET.

Hi Steve, I am still confused, help me out here...

You posted;

"Step one inlet is the only HKS cam you can keep NVCS with."

I posted:

"the biggest cam you can run with VVT"

The only difference I see here is I assumed "HKS" where you said "HKS". But otherwise don't they mean the same thing?

If HKS only have ONE inlet cam for VVT, then it must be the "biggest", surely? It can't be the "smallest" because the standard cam is "smaller".

Does anyone, other than HKS, use this Step 1, Step 2 categorisation? I have never seen it on any Jun or Tomei camshafts we have used.

I dont know about anyone else, sorry, Yes I was referring to HKS only, as other places make larger cams that can be run with NVCS.

Not so confusing now is it, you answered your own question. I know it is being pedantic, but context can be hard to convey over a forum, so I beleive some times it is warranted, such as now.

But really, if you are having such a hard time grasping the concept, why hold on so tight, doesnt really make a huge difference if you call something step one, or mild upgrade or bottom of the range?

Steve, i have a HKS 272, 8.53mm lift cam for the inlet side of rb25, and i will be getting a 272 8.7 HKS RB26 cam for the exhaust cam ai its the only one i can find to match. The cams not listed anywhere but its new with HKS stamped into it.

  • 1 month later...

I have just installed some Tomei 264 8.5mm cams. Doesn't enable the use of VCT. Not sure what to set the cam wheels to... Have the inlet on +2 degrees and exhaust on 0. I have lost power low down and gained quite a silly(feelings wise) amount after 6000rpm. Has anyone used these cams before. I am thinking maybe the exhaust side is not spot on like the 256 poncams. Hopefully I can gain some low end with some exhaust retard.

Any info would be greatly appreciated

Matt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...