Jump to content
SAU Community

Max Safe Awkw On Stock Internals?

HARDCORE

By HARDCORE,
in Four Door Family & Wagoneers

 Share

Recommended Posts

bubba Grand Master

bubba

Posted
Posted
I got mine $65 exchange I was gond buy some sard injector for $1300 so for almost a grand less thats another 22 cases of beer for me to drink :P

Where from?

I got the Denso's for my 30 before the dollar went to shit, haven't looked recently but probably a lot more now..

  • 1 month later...
EGA41T Mentor

EGA41T

Posted
Posted
you all seem a little bit optimistic with your power out puts 210-240awkw with no after market ecu?

i can only give advise on my own experience power-fc, front mount, 3" exhaust, dump pipe, 10psi, 044 bosh fuel pump.

gives me 200awkw my now problem is airflow meter is maxed out and need a bigger one (stupid power-fc) and my injectors need replacing as there up the pointy end of there duty cycle. what i did find out is the neo will never make as much power as a 33 as the neo come with smaller injectors plain and simple need more fuel to make more power.

has anybody found out if rb25 injectors fit the rb25neo?

matt is right, when modding my stagea my power was quite low with all my mods, 125kw before the power fc was installed which shot it straight up to 200.9rwkw

pixel8r Mentor

pixel8r

Posted
Posted

To get any decent power increase (ie. >30kw) you will need tuning - at least just to keep it from running way too rich.

And to go anywhere over 180-200rwkw you'll need a bigger intercooler & possibly fuel pump.

Anywhere over 200kw will probably require a larger turbo.

I found that after around 160awkw things can start to get quite expensive.

Also note, the difference between awkw and rwkw on these cars is not that much. In my experience it works out to about 20kw difference. That difference is not a percentage, so it doesn't increase (much? at all?) as the power increases. At over 300rwkw the difference might be slightly more, but I'd guess that 330rwkw is around 300awkw.

The reason awkw is lower is due to the drivetrain losses - ie. the extra load caused from driving the front wheels. This extra load does not increase as you increase power, so therefore awkw will always be ~20kw less than rwkw.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just_a_datsun
      RB26 block, rb26 head

      By Just_a_datsun · Posted

      Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • Kinkstaah
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • The Bogan
      Blue slip

      By The Bogan · Posted

      From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • Kinkstaah
      Blue slip

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...