Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys i know this has been discussed before. and its not a great idea due to all the electronics etc.

But basically i was going to throw in a full mechanical manualised auto valvebody into my r33 auto. from Joel at jd transmissions.

Basically it removes all the electronics from the the box and all shifting is done mechanically.

slightly different to the MV stage 3 kit where an electronic control box is used with a shift kitted valvebody etc.

so point is could this be done? r34 tiptronic into r33 with that manual valve body setup?

as that would eliminate most of the electrical troubles..

also i understand that i wont have the tiptronic functions etc. just wondering if it is possible. probably not worth the hassle though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/262739-crazy-idea/
Share on other sites

haha should of expected that...

Ive tossed up the idea. but last time i priced it up and even with mates rates to have it all put in it came to $2600 with a standard clutch that just isnt going to cut it. so you're looking over $3000 to do it properly.

the whole manualised auto deal is going to cost a smidge over $1000 for everything. theres a r34 box on here now for $400 - so maybe like $1500 all up. half the price.

Its just an idea im throwing out there. i personally think its more hassle than what its worth, but would be kinda cool and different if it could work.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/262739-crazy-idea/#findComment-4499653
Share on other sites

seen that vid before, i think from memory he had a c4 or something behind it? or could of been something else cant remember.

im most likely staying with the 33 box and going with that. was just simply asking would this work with the mechanical valvebody handling the shifting? therefore i wouldnt need to worry about all the fancy wiring.

2 pros i can see

- r34 box is newer than any r33 box, so should be better nick

- would get a nicer looking shifter to work with (and maybe the up down tiptronic shifting if i could work something out with that)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/262739-crazy-idea/#findComment-4500376
Share on other sites

yeah ive checked it out and with the tiptronic when you push up or down it engages an electronic switch to change gears.

so unless i wire that up to fire a motor to move the mechanical lever to change gears its out of the question. just another thing to break haha

worth the thought anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/262739-crazy-idea/#findComment-4501740
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...