Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yep, Matt =)

The graph is for the HKS GTRS's which has an antisurge compressor cover as the only difference. The Garrett -10's most likely surge on a 3ltr! but for 1/2 the price...

I'm thinking HKS do there measurements with a very high RON fuel or at the Flywheel....having said that we made 613kw at the fly on only 22psi and BP98

thats impressive... you can squeeze a few more pounds out of them ! :)

Don't worry we will go 1.8bar on my motor to see what they will do. Identical setup- oh actually different ecu last one was MOTEC mine will just be the PFC. Just weren't willing to push the customers. :devil:

Don't worry we will go 1.8bar on my motor to see what they will do. Identical setup- oh actually different ecu last one was MOTEC mine will just be the PFC. Just weren't willing to push the customers. :devil:

our circuit and drag cars came up with almost identical graphs using the same dyno.

here's the details...

drag gtr...run-in BP98 tune 22psi 455KW HKS GT-RS x 2

circuit gtr...race fuel tune 24psi 451kw HKS T04Z x 1

both were RB26's and torque curves were matched as well.

the race fuel tune on the drag car at 25psi netted an additional 50KW

Edited by DiRTgarage

what size rear housing on the t04z paul?

our circuit and drag cars came up with almost identical graphs using the same dyno.

here's the details...

drag gtr...run-in BP98 tune 22psi 455KW HKS GT-RS x 2

circuit gtr...race fuel tune 24psi 451kw HKS T04Z x 1

both were RB26's and torque curves were matched as well.

the race fuel tune on the drag car at 25psi netted an additional 50KW

i'm making 346kw(465hp) out of -5's. 19psi. i honestly believe it would push over 500 easy enough with non standard exhaust manifolds and a bigger exhaust, and some better piping.

Guess what - there have been many cars, stock dumps and stock manifolds that have made 380rwkw @ 20psi :(

he made about the same power as me so i'd assume its the 0.84.

how similar were the 2 engine setups as far as supporting mods go? Same cams/headwork/cam gear settings/intake/exhaust ?

very similar...

both built 87mm bore engines...both with extensive headwork including 1mm oversize valves...both with 280+ deg cams...both with Hypertune plenums (6 throttle on the circuit car and single throttle on the drag car) both with big intercoolers (Apexi drag on the circuit car, Trust drag on the other) both with similar exhausts 3 1/2" circuit 4" drag, both running Power FC (recently upgraded both cars to Vi-PEC ecu's) , Z32 AFM's and Blitz dual soliniod EBC's

We really had to push the circuit car to crack 450KW...the drag car was slightly better everywhere and did it with the GT-RS's without even raising a sweat.

My vote for simplicity would be T04Z as they are easier to get them to perform...but for best results the GT-RS's are the pick if you know how to set them up correctly.

The T04Z is more forgiving if the set-up is lacking in an area...the GT-RS's wont let you get away with it...everything must be spot-on. A 3 litre bottom end may make it a little easier to get right as the extra capacity will help them.

Edited by DiRTgarage
very similar...

both built 87mm bore engines...both with extensive headwork including 1mm oversize valves...both with 280+ deg cams...both with Hypertune plenums (6 throttle on the circuit car and single throttle on the drag car) both with big intercoolers (Apexi drag on the circuit car, Trust drag on the other) both with similar exhausts 3 1/2" circuit 4" drag, both running Power FC (recently upgraded both cars to Vi-PEC ecu's) , Z32 AFM's and Blitz dual soliniod EBC's

Hey,

Looks like an awesome comparo - with the exception of the exhausts.

I mean, there's a 25% difference in cross-sectional area between 3.5" and 4" and at peak flow you're asking for as much flow (and as little resistance) as possible.

Because they're physically different configurations it's a big ask to put one exhaust onto the other car.

Any chance of strapping both cars down minus as-much-of-the-exhaust-as-possible?

It would be interesting to see what (if any) difference it makes to the individual results and to the comparison.

Maybe it won't make a difference at all...

Cheers,

Saliya

Hey,

Looks like an awesome comparo - with the exception of the exhausts.

I mean, there's a 25% difference in cross-sectional area between 3.5" and 4" and at peak flow you're asking for as much flow (and as little resistance) as possible.

Because they're physically different configurations it's a big ask to put one exhaust onto the other car.

Any chance of strapping both cars down minus as-much-of-the-exhaust-as-possible?

It would be interesting to see what (if any) difference it makes to the individual results and to the comparison.

Maybe it won't make a difference at all...

Cheers,

Saliya

no chance

If you have the -10's already then im sure you'll be happy. But as food for thought, here is my t04z dyno graph.

post-33895-1238198547_thumb.jpg

As you can see, 1 bar at 4krpm, full boost by 4500.. and it makes close to peak power by 6000 rpm. Put the same thing on a 3 litre bottom end, and you would probably have 24psi before 4000rpm!

p.s. both combinations are good for at least 100 more hp than what your goal is. but i guess that leaves you plenty of room when you want to chase more power :blink:

best of luck, let us know how you go.

Wow that is a nice a power curve for a single.

What compression ratio is in that 3L?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...