Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yep, Matt =)

The graph is for the HKS GTRS's which has an antisurge compressor cover as the only difference. The Garrett -10's most likely surge on a 3ltr! but for 1/2 the price...

I'm thinking HKS do there measurements with a very high RON fuel or at the Flywheel....having said that we made 613kw at the fly on only 22psi and BP98

thats impressive... you can squeeze a few more pounds out of them ! :)

Don't worry we will go 1.8bar on my motor to see what they will do. Identical setup- oh actually different ecu last one was MOTEC mine will just be the PFC. Just weren't willing to push the customers. :devil:

Don't worry we will go 1.8bar on my motor to see what they will do. Identical setup- oh actually different ecu last one was MOTEC mine will just be the PFC. Just weren't willing to push the customers. :devil:

our circuit and drag cars came up with almost identical graphs using the same dyno.

here's the details...

drag gtr...run-in BP98 tune 22psi 455KW HKS GT-RS x 2

circuit gtr...race fuel tune 24psi 451kw HKS T04Z x 1

both were RB26's and torque curves were matched as well.

the race fuel tune on the drag car at 25psi netted an additional 50KW

Edited by DiRTgarage

what size rear housing on the t04z paul?

our circuit and drag cars came up with almost identical graphs using the same dyno.

here's the details...

drag gtr...run-in BP98 tune 22psi 455KW HKS GT-RS x 2

circuit gtr...race fuel tune 24psi 451kw HKS T04Z x 1

both were RB26's and torque curves were matched as well.

the race fuel tune on the drag car at 25psi netted an additional 50KW

i'm making 346kw(465hp) out of -5's. 19psi. i honestly believe it would push over 500 easy enough with non standard exhaust manifolds and a bigger exhaust, and some better piping.

Guess what - there have been many cars, stock dumps and stock manifolds that have made 380rwkw @ 20psi :(

he made about the same power as me so i'd assume its the 0.84.

how similar were the 2 engine setups as far as supporting mods go? Same cams/headwork/cam gear settings/intake/exhaust ?

very similar...

both built 87mm bore engines...both with extensive headwork including 1mm oversize valves...both with 280+ deg cams...both with Hypertune plenums (6 throttle on the circuit car and single throttle on the drag car) both with big intercoolers (Apexi drag on the circuit car, Trust drag on the other) both with similar exhausts 3 1/2" circuit 4" drag, both running Power FC (recently upgraded both cars to Vi-PEC ecu's) , Z32 AFM's and Blitz dual soliniod EBC's

We really had to push the circuit car to crack 450KW...the drag car was slightly better everywhere and did it with the GT-RS's without even raising a sweat.

My vote for simplicity would be T04Z as they are easier to get them to perform...but for best results the GT-RS's are the pick if you know how to set them up correctly.

The T04Z is more forgiving if the set-up is lacking in an area...the GT-RS's wont let you get away with it...everything must be spot-on. A 3 litre bottom end may make it a little easier to get right as the extra capacity will help them.

Edited by DiRTgarage
very similar...

both built 87mm bore engines...both with extensive headwork including 1mm oversize valves...both with 280+ deg cams...both with Hypertune plenums (6 throttle on the circuit car and single throttle on the drag car) both with big intercoolers (Apexi drag on the circuit car, Trust drag on the other) both with similar exhausts 3 1/2" circuit 4" drag, both running Power FC (recently upgraded both cars to Vi-PEC ecu's) , Z32 AFM's and Blitz dual soliniod EBC's

Hey,

Looks like an awesome comparo - with the exception of the exhausts.

I mean, there's a 25% difference in cross-sectional area between 3.5" and 4" and at peak flow you're asking for as much flow (and as little resistance) as possible.

Because they're physically different configurations it's a big ask to put one exhaust onto the other car.

Any chance of strapping both cars down minus as-much-of-the-exhaust-as-possible?

It would be interesting to see what (if any) difference it makes to the individual results and to the comparison.

Maybe it won't make a difference at all...

Cheers,

Saliya

Hey,

Looks like an awesome comparo - with the exception of the exhausts.

I mean, there's a 25% difference in cross-sectional area between 3.5" and 4" and at peak flow you're asking for as much flow (and as little resistance) as possible.

Because they're physically different configurations it's a big ask to put one exhaust onto the other car.

Any chance of strapping both cars down minus as-much-of-the-exhaust-as-possible?

It would be interesting to see what (if any) difference it makes to the individual results and to the comparison.

Maybe it won't make a difference at all...

Cheers,

Saliya

no chance

If you have the -10's already then im sure you'll be happy. But as food for thought, here is my t04z dyno graph.

post-33895-1238198547_thumb.jpg

As you can see, 1 bar at 4krpm, full boost by 4500.. and it makes close to peak power by 6000 rpm. Put the same thing on a 3 litre bottom end, and you would probably have 24psi before 4000rpm!

p.s. both combinations are good for at least 100 more hp than what your goal is. but i guess that leaves you plenty of room when you want to chase more power :blink:

best of luck, let us know how you go.

Wow that is a nice a power curve for a single.

What compression ratio is in that 3L?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...