Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ifs it someone from here who has driven a line before yes

if it was some random boostcruiser or something Hell NO

Haha boostcruise has such a reputation, a well deserved one at that mind

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Haha boostcruise has such a reputation, a well deserved one at that mind

english ppl have a reputation too joe - but u dont see me dogging you :P

hopefully my car is sweet for sat :P

when u guys say late.. is that late arvo or late as in late night?

english ppl have a reputation too joe - but u dont see me dogging you :P

hopefully my car is sweet for sat :D

when u guys say late.. is that late arvo or late as in late night?

Haha thats because its not a negative reputation :P

Seeing as it starts at 9:30PM id say late nite tristan

Haha thats because its not a negative reputation :)

Seeing as it starts at 9:30PM id say late nite tristan

ur lucky im not going to judge u too cronicly cuz i wana steal your wheels - but it says 930AM you pom!

fail.

Attending:

- Sammy34 + Dyno

- Turbotonic + Dyno

- TIR60 + Dyno

- Slow S13

- rb25kateosaurus/Dale

- PWND + Dyno

- E-Z + Dyno

- 45ULT

- wannaslide

- craigy32 + Dyno

- Brandon + Dyno

- NOJ37

- GimpS-R34

Gonna have to take the Dyno off me. I dont really know how to make it to 2wd... I'll be dropping by around 10 to say Hi though. Cheers!

Awesome! been looking forward to this for AGES! Is there still a limit of 20 people for dyno runs sammy?

mate, I havent spoken with whitey regarding that in a while. So im not sure, He will let everyone know whats going on when we get there.

mate, I havent spoken with whitey regarding that in a while. So im not sure, He will let everyone know whats going on when we get there.

Fair enough, Shotgun for a dyno spot if there are any left then :O

Was a great day, nice cars there, most of you wernt there but Varun from 101 motor cafe, his black R32 GTR made 824hp with 100 shot of gas.

great day, thnx to all who did make it. Hopefully we get more sau down there next time around. Some unreal cars showed up, see if we can get some photos up whitey.

thanks to Troy and Whitey for putting on an awesome day had a great turn out. everything went smooth saw some good numbers unfortunately had a couple of hick ups with 'FAT GTR' and didn't quite get the power he wanted but still a great day hopefully another one will be organised again soon and try to get some more cars on the rollers.

Cheers to all,

Smitho

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...