Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

I've recently purchased Front + Rear Subframes from an R32 GTR and will be buying a gearbox and diff/sump setup shortly. Basically I will have ALL of the mechanicals for the GTR driveline.

I can modify the floor pan for the transfer case and front chasiss rails to accept the front drive shafts - no problem. The car is a track only car and I figured this would be a cheap way to make a unique GTR driveline track car considering the driveline only cost me $1500 max for everything. The engine will be an RB30/26 setup good for around 500hp.

My only issue is the control system for the ATESSA.

In its basic form, it is a hydraulic circuit that uses auto fluid to pressureise the transfer case in the gearbox which then engages a clutch and thus drive the front wheels. Vary the pressure - vary the amount of torque split to the front wheels.

My question is, apart from the hydraulic pump and reservior - how can I control the line pressure electronically. I understand that the is a G force sensor under the center console to detect sideways forces and engage the front wheels as well as a few other smarts in the ATESSA ECU and control system.

Short of installing the whole GTR ATESSA control system (which would be a PITA) Can I use a Motec M800 output to map and control the duty cycle of a solenoid / pump / pressure regulator to control the transfercase?

Which parts would I need to work the ATESSA system as a factory system and as an aftermarket system with PWM/solenoid control?

Yours Sincerely,

Costa Tsimiklis

Director

--

------

Drift Shop Australia

- Specialising in Japanese Aftermarket Parts -

Tel: +61433 220 139 (Voice Mail Service Only)

Fax: +613 9504 0373

Email: [email protected]

Wow! Props to you for giving this a shot!!

Since youre running a 26/30, why not transplant the entire GTR ECU and Body looms, along with all of the ATTESA gear into your 4 door?

The only thing that would be different would be the wiring for the doors, but im guessing thats no issue being a track car.

That was would a piss easy way of doing it. No mods needed. Wiring is always a headache otherwise.

Femmo,

Risking has sent me a PM with some great ideas of how a 3rd party control system should work However, this control system would need to be re-mapped and tweaked each time torque output or grip is changed. If not mapped correctly, basically you will break the front diff off the sump.

After investigating it further, it appears that the ATESSA relies on the ABS unit to get wheel speed as well as braking forces to compute how much torque to transfer to the front.

The easiest way to do a conversion would be to gut the electronincs and ABS out of a GTR and it should be able to run after a custom install.

Secondly, it is probably cheaper and easier to buy a rolling GTR shell with the electronics and use that as a base if the shell is smashed - or just using a GTR to begin with anyway lol.

I will still proceed with installing most of the mechanical driveline just incase I can find someone thats stripping a stock GTR out that has been smashed :unsure:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...