Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gearbox

Gearbox cross member (As may be different to auto)

Tailshaft / Front yoke (As may be different to auto)

Speedo cable (As may be different to auto)

New clutch

Flywheel n bolts

Clutch Slave cylinder

Clutch Master cylinder

Clutch fork

Clutch hose (slave cylinder) and pipe from clutch to master cylinder

Pedals both clutch and brake ( auto pedal is to big to fit with clutch)

Manual ECU

Leather gear stick boot and plastic surround

Keep in mind I haven't done it yet...will go in once the VQ is ready.

Ok so i have 2 ways, 1 go manual and use a standalone, 2 install a shift kit and use standalone, i want to know the costs of those 2.. though the 2 requires a rebuilt in the transmition.. Ok i will search for these..

Thank you all!!

You are very quick and full of informations! :thumbsup:

manual conversion then you have to change your wiring. plugs to the ecu wont suit a powerfc or any other standalone. from what i know anyways

Hi all,

I was searching the forum but found nothing that clears what standalone can be used as plug and play to a R34 GT-t with triptronic, can you please help me.. I want to select the right standalone..

Thank you

Akis.

best bet is to remap the std ecu, we do dozens and im sure someone could help you out.

www.nistune.com

  • 3 months later...

Speak to Satanic on here.... Pm him ..... he has a close to 400 rwkw AUTO R34 ...... it runs an F-con pro (i think) ...anyway, it knows when the auto is about to shift and softens up the power to make smoother shifts etc .... best to speak to him, but it works very well.... and you can't dispute close to 400 rwkw !

Gary

  • 2 months later...
Speak to Satanic on here.... Pm him ..... he has a close to 400 rwkw AUTO R34 ...... it runs an F-con pro (i think) ...anyway, it knows when the auto is about to shift and softens up the power to make smoother shifts etc .... best to speak to him, but it works very well.... and you can't dispute close to 400 rwkw !

Gary

:blush:

Bit of an old thread but....

Haltech and ViPec then work on an auto R34 GT-T? I'm looking at getting a new ECU, tune whatever and wanna keep my auto box. I don't wanna f*ck around with a manual gearbox conversion (not to mention I'll be paying ~$2000 to put R33 parts into my R34), I may aswell sell up and buy something thats manual (from my POV).

However if I build up the Auto box then I can run whatever the hell I want? Apexi, Motec, etc. Whats required in building up the auto and how much will that set me back?

So I believe my options are...

1) Haltech, ViPec, Nistune or E-manage.

2) Build the box up and run whatever ECU I like.

Is this correct? I've done so much searching on the subject my head is spinning!

Bit of an old thread but....

Haltech and ViPec then work on an auto R34 GT-T? I'm looking at getting a new ECU, tune whatever and wanna keep my auto box. I don't wanna f*ck around with a manual gearbox conversion (not to mention I'll be paying ~$2000 to put R33 parts into my R34), I may aswell sell up and buy something thats manual (from my POV).

However if I build up the Auto box then I can run whatever the hell I want? Apexi, Motec, etc. Whats required in building up the auto and how much will that set me back?

So I believe my options are...

1) Haltech, ViPec, Nistune or E-manage.

2) Build the box up and run whatever ECU I like.

Is this correct? I've done so much searching on the subject my head is spinning!

As covered before, the Haltch and Vipec WON'T run the Auto box, the auto logic is inside the stock ECU. HOWEVER everyone that is saying it will work has probably seen it work on an R33 or similar where the auto logic is controlled externally to the factory ECU, so you can stick a standalone in those cars...NOT the R34 GTT (even the tiptronic R34 25GT will work with standalone, it had to be different)

Nistune is the most simple and effect option, the remaps really are good. I've got a different type of board, but I can play with ever facet of the tune adn retain the factory ECU and shift logic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...