Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

With hesitence I am putting up my 1992 HCR32 GTS-t Type M (which I have owned since July 2005. I am the 2nd owner of this car since buying it off a good friend. It was first imported and complied in late 2000 so has been in the country since then.

Has had a few mods done to it since its been here.

Here is a list of things on it so far mechanically.

Engine

- Standard RB20DET

- Splitfire Coilpacks

- Link GTS-Link ECU

- RB25 High-flowed turbo with steel internals.

- Stainless Turbo manifold

- Blitz Front Mount Intercooler

- Blitz Super Sound DD BOV

- Bosch 040 Fuel-Pump

Driveline

-Exedy Cushion Button Single plate clutch.

Suspension

-Yashio Factory Street Coil-overs (not sure what model but only has 6-level damper adjustment)

-JJR Solid Adjustable Castor rods.

Wheels

-Simmons FR17 (Fronts) 17x8 (Rear) 17x9

*front left wheel missing centre-cap.

Exterior

-Standard looking car with the Nissan Type-M 'Aero-Style' kit. No Wing

Interior

-Nardi Steering Wheel

-Apexi RSM + G-sensor

-Apexi EL Series boost-gauge.

The car has done 232,000km. I first purchased it when it had 174,000km in 2005. It has treated me well since then and has rarely given me any issues aside from the usual seizing coil-packs and blown turbo gaskets. Normally driven on the weekends or sometimes to work.

Engine was comp-tested recently and showing clean and even 130psi across all cylinders and no oil-leaks.

Always garaged and cleaned on a regular basis. Car is the original Metallic Black in colour and the body and paint-job is in overall good condition for its age yet has picked up dings and scratches over the years. It has had a number of small bumps which have been fixed and resprayed (ie parking lot scars).

Looking at $10,500 ONO without RWC but open to discussions on RWC. Registered until Nov' 2009.

Located in Melbourne, Western Suburbs, feel free to PM me or E-Mail me at [email protected].

p1010248n.jpg

p1030231n.jpg

Deciding on an upgrade so hope she goes to a good owner.

Will post up more pics soon.

Edited by Jenius
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...