Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest Mashrock
P.S. I used to have a WRX and had the same transition problems.

i made the step up from a pulsar gti-r and already have hurt my gtr in the rain around a tight corner.

but now am getting alot more used to steering the oppisite way out of a corner rather than turning full lock the correct way and planting it.

and about them transfer modifications?? what exactly is involved??

as circuit racing is well on the cards for me in the next few months.

Geez,

1st of all better late than never with this reply, Ive been busy for a while with some nurses and trying to set up my ATTESSA for the track.

Does anyone know if this legend is still around, (Ferrari might have snapped him up) I need him to set up my car in for the track.

How much does he charge? Is cheque OK or does he take cash?

Please

Geez,

1st of all better late than never with this reply, Ive been busy for a while with some nurses and trying to set up my ATTESSA for the track.

Does anyone know if this legend is still around, (Ferrari might have snapped him up) I need him to set up my car in for the track.

How much does he charge? Is cheque OK or does he take cash?

Please

:confused:

BTW for those that are interested we can source an atessa controller for the 32, locally developed. 10 settings from Full RWD to Max front (about 50% depending on the health of your transfer case). Around $400 for the kit :(

Haha, first lap in my GTR I drove it like my old rex. chucked it in the corners then mashed it. lots of smoke, sideways and s-l-o-w. at first I thought what a heap of shit, but when I backed off because of fuel supply issues my lap time dropped 2sec! got me thinking...

As for opposite lock, I dont know if i'm ever gonna master the jerky reaction impulse. Just cant seem to find the faith in an automated system. that pisses me off.

ANyone here considered an ETS Controlller, I just purchased a second M's ETS controller off of Yahoo Japan myself, will be fitting it soon.. I see a lot of people asying that after removal of HICAS and fitment of a decent controller setup for a track that ATTESSA can be both stable and predictable.. I am yet to see or believe this..

Duncan: Got any pics? :)

umm no pics yet, although it looks just like a little black box lol.

But to keep this thread on track I have started a group buy here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...715#post1282715

  • 4 weeks later...

Two T's . One S's. ATTESA. Thats how Nissan spelled it.

Here some information on the ATTESA system that was part of a press release. Lets you know how the system works.

http://rbmotoring.com/gallery/album151

The system in an R32 is pretty slow and very rear biased. The R33 and R34 system is faster and will bring the front wheels in a bit quicker.

The Nissan racecars had adjustable torque split control.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...