Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm sick of this car.

I've spent almost 2 years amassing parts and over 3 months assembling the engine. It has never run the way I want it to.

It's been to the tuner 4 times. Initial tune, twice for idling problems then adjusted for the GTR BOV that the majority of you say is so great. That GTR BOV has no dosing silliness but the boost hit is soft and it doesnt play well with the engine.

I've had 4 BOV's (SSQV, Synchronic, Greddy and now the GTR). The hated SSQV has the best overall normal street drivability and hardest hitting boost but the surging/dosing and associated drive line chatter at high boost is unacceptable.

So far, I replaced the coils with a new set of Splitfires, then a new igniter. Last week, when it went in for the GTR BOV adjustment, a Splitfire went bad so a new set of OEM Nissan coils and a new coil harness were installed. Also, my third set of sparkplugs in 8 months.

Got the car back this Saturday. Seemed to run fine until I boosted to the normal 18 PSI. Since then, at first start up, from sitting overnight, it runs normal until it warms to about 60 degrees C. It then will miss and the idle will be unpleasant until after 85 degrees C. Tuner says there is very little fuel or timing changes between 70 - 90 C. It rarely runs hotter than 84 C.

Of course, took him for a ride tonight and the car behaved relatively normal. My wife said a cloud of black smoke was emitted after I drove off in anger afterward, while boosting to 17 PSI. Perhaps my fuel pressure gauge is not correct and the PFC is doing its best to compensate. The softer boost hit and smoke could be attributed to over fueling but the A/F ratio and the sensor readings from the PFC are within normal operating parameters according my tuner. How can it be rich then?

The only thing left to do is verify the fuel pressure with a known good, calibrated gauge and send the PFC to Apexi for testing.

My tuner is Fujii from Fujii Dynamics. After living in Japan for a few years; I've learned that the locals cannot think outside of the box. I think that is the case here.

Any ideas?

1994 ECR33

Reconditioned head at NAPREC

Balanced crank, flywheel and pulley at NAPREC

PFC

HKS pod filter

Copy Super Suction

Q45 MAF

GT-R FMIC

HKS 2530Kai turbo kit

GTR BOV

HKS EVC V

HKS 1.6mm head gasket

JJR split/dump pipe

Cat back exhaust with resonator

Nismo Timing belt

HKS exhaust cam gear

Tomei Poncams

Nismo 555cc injectors and fuel regulator

GT-R fuel pump

As weather cools air is denser. You may find its pushing out past where it was tuned and in to an area of the map where the tuner has it running richer just in case you push up that boost or it dips in to that load point as a result of cold dense air.

As for the cloud of smoke/fuel when did it occur?

Start/middle/end of a gear or on the gear change? Have the better half give the car a flogging while you drive her car behind to get a better idea.

Last week, when it went in for the GTR BOV adjustment.

just on that part... what exactly did you adjust?

They are not adjustable.

Sounds like a vac leak perhaps, or a dirty AFM

Plugs in good condition?

Whats the FPR reading? Is it set right? (really a part that's not required part)

AFM is clean.

Plugs are less than a week old.

I know the GTR BOV requires no mechanical adjustment, it was the PFC tune for recirc. Yes, it needed it because it would not idle otherwise.

the fuel is about 40 PSI with the vacuum line off. Why is the adjustable FPR not required?

It ran fine (except for the dosing fun) with the SSQV, I doubt the vacuum issue.

It really doesn't matter, I have to return to the US in about a month, unexpectedly.

I'm going to get raped on the selling price regardless. I could part it out but I don't have the time. It would be nice to sell it for $7000 but that's not going to happen in its current condition.

In my frustration, I took off the GTR BOV to install the Greddy. I wanted to try the adjustable spring setting just for the hell of it.

A few weeks ago, I enlarged the cross pipe BOV port and the ECR33 adapter plate to match the Greddy valve and the OEM metal gasket was not going to work with the GTR BOV either. I used .8mm gasket material and it didn't look like it made full contact/seal.

It only had impressions from the BOV flange on the ends where the bolts are. I figure that the gasket wasn't soft enough or I didn't torque it correctly. So I sprayed a thick serving of silicone lube on both sides of the gasket and installed the Greddy.

Like magic, the car is fine.

I sincerely apologize for going off initially. My life are a little hectic right now. I'm going to be in Iraq in a few months and my wife is staying in Japan.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...