Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

GRrrrrrrrR!!!!!!! y is there so many cameras!!! i swear its just a matter of time b4 my lisence gets suspended.. 1 point by 1 point.. :( i get all my 1 point fines on my daily drive ad non with my gtr

!!! :happy: i think i have issues :(

hmm ok these are on the monash....does anyone know if they are operational yet? Cause if they are I'm royally screwed...esp given the 60k and 80k speed limits.

I might have been a bad girl on occasions at 4.00am en route to work..

By themselves they would just log speeds and traffic data. Obviously they can't record your registration unless hooked up to a normal camera. So I fail to see how this changes anything. The camera would be just like any other fixed/mobile speed camera that is visible.

Quiksta, on monash f/way in centre median strip b/t blackburn rd and the next major overpass outbound(i cant remember the next road, sorry), and same spot inbound. There is a weird like tower across the roads from where these are. The only reason I saw them today is becasue of the fantastic roadworks blocking 2 of the lanes and the traffic was banked back to chadstone. This is where i saw one, maybe there are more...

Surely we would be notified if they were operational? I even rung a truckie I know and he said he wasnt aware of them... :P

GRrrrrrrrR!!!!!!! y is there so many cameras!!! i swear its just a matter of time b4 my lisence gets suspended.. 1 point by 1 point.. :P i get all my 1 point fines on my daily drive ad non with my gtr

!!! :) i think i have issues :)

errrr...then drive normally? I've had one speeding fine in 6.5 years of driving and that can't just be luck as I drive a lot.

Speaking of speed, I'm still trying to work out why everyone does 50km/h in a 60km/h zone on the way to work, but tailgates me in a 40km/h school zone, and blocks the keep clear zones. :huh:

That is a true mystery I have yet to solve.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...