Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm currently putting together an RB20 with a HKS 2530 and injectors/fuel pump/fmic/z32 AFM/eManage Ultimate. I put the new turbo and FMIC on and have taken it for a test drive to make sure I didn't break and it seemed to work ok(slightly laggier than expected). I'm not expecting it to run properly without a tune and the new injectors/fuel pump but I got a very bad misfire at just under 5000rpm at 10PSI.

Is there anyway to test if this is due to lean out or whether its a spark issue? I don't wanna waste money getting new coils if I don't need too but if its a lean out issue then that won't be fixed until the tune, and I want it all together by the time I get it tuned.

Edited by Kwyjibo
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/270465-lean-or-spark-problems/
Share on other sites

Go and get it tuned FFS.

Thats the only way you will know for sure.

How can you possibly expect the engine to function correctly after all those mods.

Next you will be posting "Why did my engine blow up?"

Ummm, if you read my post you would understand that I took it for a TEST drive to ensure the turbo and FMIC was running smoothly(no other mods have been put on yet). I was just wondering if there was a way to tell whether I will need new coils or not BEFORE I spend $700 on the tune I am going to get before I blow my engine. Hence where I said ''I'm not expecting it to run properly without a tune and the new injectors/fuel pump''

I understand there are a lot of fairly clueless people on here but I clearly stated in my first post that my plans are to get a tune and I know my car is not going to run properly until then, and it will be off the road until then. I like to test the car inbetween each mod(obviously I won't be able too with injectors and AFM) to ease troubleshooting in the long term.

I just wanted to know if there is an easy way to tell the difference between the misfire so I don't have to take the car out again till its tuned.....

Please read my full post next time before posting, anything resembling and answer to my question would have been nice as well.

Edited by Kwyjibo

The only way to diagnose it properly is to get on the dyno.

Simple.

Im sure the tuner knows more about this sort of stuff than you do.

If you think its coils, get some coils off another car that you know are working and test. Check for any boost leaks ect

Other than that you cant do much until you get it on the dyno.

And of course its running lean, you have just put a bigger turbo on that flows a hell of a lot more air than stock the ECU cant feed enough fuel to it.

The ECU is most likely hitting R&R.

Clueless people indeed.

Thank you thats what I thought. I will just buy some coils as mine are getting old anyway.

I'm not clueless, I just don't have a lot of knowledge apart from what I read on here, which is why I ask so I can learn these things. No need to be rude about it.

I know it would be running way too lean and well above the current tune(even though I'm running way less boost than before), but as I stated all I wanted to know is if there is a way to tell the difference between misfiring due to learning out, or misfiring due to ignition issues.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...