Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guyz... has anyone been having this problem when i click on the back button of my internet explorer browser it doesnt go to the previous page then i have to click again.. so i always have to click the back button 2 times to go to the previous page..

Please do let me know if its with my browser or its universal...

Thanks...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271770-back-to-previous-pagebug/
Share on other sites

So what do we do guyz? Is it only our browser problem.

--------------------------------

have the same symptoms and its on lots of sites not just SAU - whose stuffing up the internet the govt refining its spying on users or Microsoft ?- may have to use RESTORE function under WIN XP Prof SVC Pk 3 if no-one finds a better solution soon

If you click on the little downward arrow to the right of the Back button in IE7, you will see what's causing the problem.

Between "Current Page" and the last page you actually visited you will see an ad server link that starts with something like http://googleads.g.doubleclick.......

That seems to be reloading the current page when you click the back button.

I think there is a HOST file fix for this, will post back if/when I find it, hopefully there is something the site admins can do about it as well.

Ye its since the addition of the google ad's.

They wont be here for long (hopefully), they are only here at present due to the forum running costs not being fully met by traders/donations/Digital Niche Ads (along the top)...

A quick fix for IE7 users to try - go to Tools > Internet Options > Advanced tab and uncheck the box next to "Show friendly HTTP error messages".

Click "Apply" and close the dialog box. Try going into a forum post and then clicking the back button.

Well, it worked for me :(

Edited by JD_R33
A quick fix for IE7 users to try - go to Tools > Internet Options > Advanced tab and uncheck the box next to "Show friendly HTTP error messages".

Click "Apply" and close the dialog box. Try going into a forum post and then clicking the back button.

Well, it worked for me :P

Thanks JD

Seems to have worked for me too :D

A quick fix for IE7 users to try - go to Tools > Internet Options > Advanced tab and uncheck the box next to "Show friendly HTTP error messages".

Click "Apply" and close the dialog box. Try going into a forum post and then clicking the back button.

Well, it worked for me :D

Thanks JD... That really helped... im so relieved now

A quick fix for IE7 users to try - go to Tools > Internet Options > Advanced tab and uncheck the box next to "Show friendly HTTP error messages".

Click "Apply" and close the dialog box. Try going into a forum post and then clicking the back button.

Well, it worked for me :)

Works but doesn't save the settings on my laptop.

Everytime I come back into the site I have to set it up again

:thumbsup:

you might also wanna try upping the number of page/image loads in the advanced settings, as sometimes IE will wait on a page to load (google ad tracker) before rendering another page (SAU).

I was experiencing same problem but now its gone what I did was :

go to MY COMPUTER - select the operating system DRIVE : "C" in my case -then DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS - then main user name or code - then open the COOKIES and USER DATA folders and delete everything in there, apart from the Index DAT files which are not deletable

problem fixed

and this gets rid of most if not all of those parasite sites that are trying to track your activities for their own commercial gain and clogging up your pc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...