Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Bit of a bimbo question. Im soon going to be cutting open my bonnet to fit a Z tune style universal bonnet vent. Im currently running splitfire coilpacks with the coilpack cover removed..

Just wondering what i should do once i fit this bonnet vent? Should i simply just not take the car out at all when it rains or just fit the cam cover back on once ive fitted the bonnet vent?

Let me know what you guys have all done...

Thanks

Edited by Dean_HR31
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274713-vented-bonnets/
Share on other sites

The vented bonnet should come with a piece of metal that you can bolt back on to cover up the vents from underneath.

When it is cold and wet, you won't need the vent as the ambient temp's are a lot lower.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274713-vented-bonnets/#findComment-4656632
Share on other sites

Have you jet washed your engine with the cover removed? did it fark it up? If it hasn't you should be fine because less water would get in through the vents than a jet wash, and at lower pressure :)

I have a carbon vented bonnet and I've never had a problem with water in the bay. That said i do have a cover on the coils, but I jet wash it and theres no problems.

+1 put the cover back on

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274713-vented-bonnets/#findComment-4661895
Share on other sites

hmmmmm

Am i defeating the purpose at all of the vented bonnet if i put the cover back on the coilpacks?

I understand the purpose of a vented bonnet isnt only to keep the ignition system cooler but im just thinking what things would give way first with too much heat....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274713-vented-bonnets/#findComment-4661917
Share on other sites

not much you can do unless it comes with the plate like mentioned earlier, my mate just bought a border racing bonnet from jap and the vent is HUGE! BUT it was designed for FC rx7's so the vent spills the watter into an area with no electrics and what not.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274713-vented-bonnets/#findComment-4671630
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...