Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

marc - hahaha or seeing like 20 zz30 soarers parked on the side of the road - just.. cos.. - -- they've broken down again.

- - and the owner has NO idea what the problem is.

Hhahaha mine hasnt broken yet.

But i dont have EMV, TEMS or any of that shit.

I;d be more thinking that the soarer drivers would be sitting around fapping over some stupidy over priced badly made dump pipes or their BFI's....not actually racing lol

they could also have the chaser boys with their cars dropped, stupidly high spring rate suspension and buttloads of camber on the rear wheels driving around slowing right down for each bump because either their car bottoms out or they are too scared of it bottoming out, and with flat brimmed caps stuck on top of their helmets.

don't know how people can race in that view. shits me off

That does look awesome... Nice to see that the GT-style over taking has been abolished.

/sarcasm

Graphics look lovely, but that is a prime example of why DNF's are needed in GT... not to mention proper damage

they could also have the chaser boys with their cars dropped, stupidly high spring rate suspension and buttloads of camber on the rear wheels driving around slowing right down for each bump because either their car bottoms out or they are too scared of it bottoming out, and with flat brimmed caps stuck on top of their helmets.

Could also have the V6 magna guys....driving to the corner store in their lawn bowls gear :)

or flat capping with tempe chromies, trying to listen to 2-pac over their badly mounted cannon exhaust.

:D

don't know how people can race in that view. shits me off

Yeh, me too.

Coz, like, I always drive my real car from the front bumper. :D

I'm sure it will be more useable on the 50" plasma - but a zoom function would still be nice. Or won't we have that option either?

Yeh, me too.

Coz, like, I always drive my real car from the front bumper. :P

I'm sure it will be more useable on the 50" plasma - but a zoom function would still be nice. Or won't we have that option either?

the problem with the cockpit view is that the pillar gets in the way. in a real car you can look out the side window or move your hear around. the natural field of vision is much greater than on a flat screen. what also shits me is the complete difference in the amount of steering input that the animated driver has to the actual driver. i'd like to see someone do a u-turn on a 2 lane road with only turning the steering wheel 90 degrees.

so far i've found the cockpit view pretty awesome despite all the complaining thats happening about it. and my flat screen is only 26" and i sit pretty far away from it, yet i've posted several top 1000, top 500-300 ish times using the cockpit view on prologue.

i dont see the issue having straight line only vision from the cockpit, even the front bumper view is still only straight line. if you think about it when you drive a real car at high speeds you might notice that you will probably never turn your head more than 5-10degrees in any direction from straight ahead anyway. and because gt5 is in 16:9 aspect you have a pretty realistic in-game vision given that 16:9 is pretty close to the aspect that you get from human vision anyway. i'll assume every one of you has seen on tv when they have a v8 supercar race every now and then they'll broadcast a view of the driver in any given car, you dont see him making drastic head movements when approaching a corner. like i mentioned before, if the head moves then it doesnt move far. and the view you do get from those subtle movements i'm pretty happy thats pretty much what we're getting from the view in GT5 cockpit.

piece.

also im interested to know what peoples thoughts are on whether using a good wheel/pedal set is worthwhile, does it make good lap times more achievable? at the moment im just using the controller, but im quite keen on giving that HKS controller a go if it actually comes out.. i've seen no mention of it from retailers in nz yet.. shit i'll even get one shipped over from oz if i have to

Edited by jonboy
also im interested to know what peoples thoughts are on whether using a good wheel/pedal set is worthwhile, does it make good lap times more achievable? at the moment im just using the controller, but im quite keen on giving that HKS controller a go if it actually comes out.. i've seen no mention of it from retailers in nz yet.. shit i'll even get one shipped over from oz if i have to

Personally I wouldn't drive a game without wheel and pedals, but as you may have guessed, I'm a bit of a realism nerd when it comes to driving sims. Expect your times to go backwards when you switch to a wheel and pedals - you'll wonder why you torture yourself so much. After a while your times should match what you were achieving with the controller, and you might even beat them (although that may not necessarily happen). The whole experience will be a lot better though, so it's well worth it IMO, and you pick up more of the subtle cues of the game that you just don't get with a controller.

Oh, and big head turns at high speed are a part of life if you're a fully sik drift god or rally nut ;)

Oh, by the way, I was being sarcastic about driving from bumper view. I use cockpit wherever possible -that's half the fun of the game. Of course things like the steering wheel not turning full lock are a bit annoying - I'm surprised they haven't got that properly sorted.

Edited by warps
Oh, and big head turns at high speed are a part of life if you're a fully sik drift god or rally nut ;)

yea.. good call. that never crossed my mind as im far better at grip driving in gran turismo than i am at drift so i seldom do drifting.

it would be awesome if they could incorporate different styles of drifting into it. in the game, both hands are firmly planted on the wheel at all times but it would make things more interesting if it gave you the option of using the slip steering method, where you essentially put the power on, get the arse end sliding, let go of the wheel then catch it when the car is at the desired angle and adjust throttle to suit.

but since you need to accurately steer every little bit of it, i find it just too difficult to keep a steady throttle/steering with the controller. i guess thats where the value of the wheel and pedals come in, you can hold consistent throttle and steering values for a smother racing line etc rather than simple on or off throttle that i normally have to contend with lol

if you watch professional racers, they might not turn their head much, but if you watch their eyes they move a lot. goind round a left hand corner the centre of their vision will be the left hand side of the windscreen

i just can't use the cockpit view. the steering wheel movement puts me off. i use the front bar view and my times are between 200 and 800 on the online ranking

yeah good call.. the eyes will move a lot. i guess as time goes on and polyphony digital receive feedback they'll release updates/patches for it. im guessing if enough people suggest it they would make the cockpit view have dynamic sight where the view may alter depending on your position in relation to the corner, just like in real life. that would be sweet. but then that brings about a new set of problems.. such as did they capture enough image data of the interior of each car in order to pull that off, or did they only capture just enough interior to cater for the existing cockpit view in a fixed position??

and lets not turn this thread into a wank-off over lap times

yea.. good call. that never crossed my mind as im far better at grip driving in gran turismo than i am at drift so i seldom do drifting.

Yeh the rally mode in GT4 was crap and unrealistic (none of the real life techniques seem to make a difference), so I don't know if it's any better in GT5. Drifting doesn't do a lot for me, so I haven't wasted any time there either. I'm not good at either type of driving IRL, but I take to gravel much better than tarmac. Haha must be my finnish heritage.

As for lap times, well you won't be seeing any of my times in the top 1000 (top 1,000,000 maybe). Besides, the best sim racers don't waste their time on playstations. They're too busy racing in I-race leagues or similar.

Oh, Jonboy, someone made a patch for GPL where the view turns with the steering wheel (ie the further you turn, the further into the corner you look). I think it was adjustable up to a max of maybe 30 deg. Everyone who tried it soon gave it away (me included) as it tended to make you feel car sick ;) . Someone was playing around with another patch which links to a web cam, and tilting your head would make the FOV turn into the corner. I never did see how that panned out though (escuse the pun)

Edited by warps

this reminds me! im sure a year or so ago i read somewhere that polyphony were devolping software that would utilise a usb camera and could analyse the players eyes and wherever you tried to look it would shift the view accordingly. i forgot all about this until now actually.. has anyone else heard of this?? or am i dillusional.

surely it could be done.. although it would have to be a pretty high res camera to accurately track eyeball movements

Edited by jonboy
this reminds me! im sure a year or so ago i read somewhere that polyphony were devolping software that would utilise a usb camera and could analyse the players eyes and wherever you tried to look it would shift the view accordingly. i forgot all about this until now actually.. has anyone else heard of this?? or am i dillusional.

surely it could be done.. although it would have to be a pretty high res camera to accurately track eyeball movements

I think that its supposed to be the Move camera but i think it felt a bit weird cause you had to move your whole head. Pretty sure it was at Gamescon or something...one of them shows anyway.

The Camera is the PS3 Eye (standard camera), and it has been implemented, it tracks your head so if you move it it will copy the movements on screen, I don't know how useful it will be but it is there, and you can look around the pillar if you need to.

Some of the reviews say that it is a little laggy, but I guess it is wait and see what happens on release day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...