Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Im in the process of putting together the SK Gb setup for my 33 and so for have the complete Camber/Caster Kit and Pineapples (Not installed yet) and I was measuring up the ride hieght the other day to discover 260mm front and 350mm rear centre of wheel to guard hieght.

Now Ive always thought my line sits a little lower than most so is there such a thing as Factory lowered suspension on the 33 GTST???

Im fairly sure that I have factory suspension but not 100%

The suspension travel still feels fairly tight so I dont "think" it is past its use by date but again im not sure

Car is 98 GTST with 100k (Genuine with books)

Hey guys,

Im in the process of putting together the SK Gb setup for my 33 and so for have the complete Camber/Caster Kit and Pineapples (Not installed yet) and I was measuring up the ride hieght the other day to discover 260mm front and 350mm rear centre of wheel to guard hieght.

Now Ive always thought my line sits a little lower than most so is there such a thing as Factory lowered suspension on the 33 GTST???

Im fairly sure that I have factory suspension but not 100%

The suspension travel still feels fairly tight so I dont "think" it is past its use by date but again im not sure

Car is 98 GTST with 100k (Genuine with books)

260 mm front, I don't think so?

Standard (new) height is 375 mm front and 365 mm rear, settling 15 mm from standard is not unusual.

Cheers

Gary

GTR V-Spec's factory suspension are generally lower than the normal GTR's. Check your VIN through Nissan FAST, might shed some light on the suspension.
Car is 98 GTST with 100k (Genuine with books)
Eh, 15mm in 100kk's isn't "sagging", it's well in the region of "acceptable settling". :P

Cheers

Gary

Thanks SK looks like I still have a bit of time to get new gear. As I said earlier it still feels very tight and the car has been meticulously looked after since ive had it so I wouldnt think they are shot.

As long as they will hang in for at least this year ill be happy.

Now to just put the camber and caster kit on

Thanks again for the advice

Eh, 15mm in 100kk's isn't "sagging", it's well in the region of "acceptable settling". :P

Cheers

Gary

true, 350 is still legal (at the limit), and 360 is well over legal for the front. if he wasnt gonna buy new stuff anyway, you'd probably get away with it. last thing u want however is to get defected for being a few mm too low with stock suspension because u just put in a full tank of fuel. so honestly there isnt a lot of point having stock suspension if theres still a good chance of getting defected anyway.

true, 350 is still legal (at the limit), and 360 is well over legal for the front. if he wasnt gonna buy new stuff anyway, you'd probably get away with it. last thing u want however is to get defected for being a few mm too low with stock suspension because u just put in a full tank of fuel. so honestly there isnt a lot of point having stock suspension if theres still a good chance of getting defected anyway.

Unless I'm mistaken he's in NSW, we don't have ignorant Nazis doing rego here like you do in SA. We actually follow the ADR's, which means 345/335 is OK as long as it has a well designed 3" exhaust and the bump stops have been trimmed.

Cheers

Gary

Unless I'm mistaken he's in NSW, we don't have ignorant Nazis doing rego here like you do in SA. We actually follow the ADR's, which means 345/335 is OK as long as it has a well designed 3" exhaust and the bump stops have been trimmed.

Cheers

Gary

is it 345/335 over there? bastards. its 350/340 here, i thought that was universal for all states.

SA may have nazi's, but technically if the car is a few mm before 350, it is illegal and against the ADR's.

There are basically 3 relevant ADR's;

500 mm headlight centre from the ground.

100 mm minimum ground clearance.

2/3rd suspension travel retained.

The 500 mm headlights is never a problem for a R32/33/34, because the engine subframe would be scraping on the ground if the headlights were 500 mm or less. Even standard length shocks don't have a problem with retaining 2/3rd the travel at 345/335. Then there are the options of lower profile strut tops and shorter shocks if necessary, remembering that 2/3rds is metal to metal.

The one that causes the most problem for R32/33/34's is the 100 mm minimum ground clearance, as the exhaust goes under the rear subframe. So a car with a 2.5" exhaust of decent design would have no problem with clearing 100 mm at 345/335. Even a 3" usually makes it, it's when you get to 3.5" and 4" exhausts that 345/335 isn't possible, there simply isn't enough room to fit that diameter exhaust under the subframe.

So the simplistic Nazis that say 350/340 is the ADR height are completely incorrect, there is no such measurement specified. The fact is I could have one at 320/310 that fully complied with the ADR's, if I used the appropriate parts, oval exhaust, short shocks and low profile strut tops.

Cheers

Gary

ahk, over here in SA the eyebrow height is the first thing they go for.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/post-a192357-

it's actually 355 and 345 for the R33/R32. so technically it would be illegal. but if they dont check for that over there then ur in business.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
    • Can you also make sure the invoices on the box (And none exist in the boxes) are below our import duty limits... I jest, there's nothing I need to actually purchase and order in. (Unless you can find me a rear diff carrier, brand new, for stupidly cheap, that is for a Toyota Landcruiser, HZJ105R GXL, 2000 year model...)  
×
×
  • Create New...