Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So,

We most people are getting the following mods:

- Z tube/CF Tube

- Plenum Spacer

- CAI/Pop Charger

- Ground kit.

I've been reading gains of 15wKW or 20whp, for all these mods combined

What I want to know effect these mods will have on our 0-100km/h and 1/4mile times.

I'm looking at taking my car to the track in a few months for some 1/4 mile runs, so I guess I'm curious whether it'll improve my times.

for 03-05 Coupes

0-100

6MT about 6.0

5AT about 6.3

1/4mile mid 14's

I'm guessing that if the Grounding kit improves the 5AT's shifting, wouldn't that bring its acceleration closer to that of the 6MT?

Edited by danny_tq
and semi slick tyre..

remove back seat, remove any audio, remove some driver weight... (these cost nil)

I've always kinda viewed that as "cheating", as most of the time you won't drive with a setup lke that.

Personally, i would be more interested in what my day to day setup can do, not a stripped out setup only for testing purposes. I won't deny that it will help though. Only my 2cents..

To the OP,

Where did you find those acceleration times ? I've always read that stock 6mt is around 6.6seconds. Just curious.

my bad

they are 0-60mph times, mainly from US reviews.

for 0-100kmh add about 0.2 to those times

6.2 6MT

6.5 5AT

edmunds.com (our drive.com.au equivalent) did a test on the g35 got 6.2 0-60mph, cant find the link right now.

Edited by danny_tq
my bad

they are 0-60mph times, mainly from US reviews.

for 0-100kmh add about 0.2 to those times

6.2 6MT

6.5 5AT

edmunds.com (our drive.com.au equivalent) did a test on the g35 got 6.2 0-60mph, cant find the link right now.

Ahh ok American numbers. It most likely has a "roll out" 30cm margin in that time where the car is not timed. There was a comprehensive-ish post on 350z tech regarding American testing methods for 0-100 and 1/4 mile. That 30cm rollout would shave off around 0.3 or so seconds from a proper timing from standstill.

It explains why American magazines are publishing low 13s quarter and low 5s (almost dipping into 4s) for the new 370Z whilst Aussie mags are getting the best of high 5s/6 and high 13's for the 1/4. E.g American 370z 0-60mph is 5.2 and Aussie 370z 0-100 is 5.8 so 0.3s for 30cm rollout and around 0.3s for the difference between 0-60mph and 0-100km/h.

Also the G35's in the US sometime after introduction got the VQ35DE revup motor with a bit more power like our local 350Zs. Whereas the 350GT skylines never got an engine upgrade when facelifted/series 2 (Nissan should've done it though grr.. would've paid the extra and enjoy the higher redline).

Fwiw i've timed my car at 5.7s for 0-60mph with hard-ish shifting and a good launch which i'm pretty happy with as i've got the premium pack/tv/Bose and sunroof (more weight than usual). Done with one of those g-tech meters which while not completely accurate, is a good tool to compare to other cars long as you're using the same unit.

Off the top of my head, some other numbers from the same meter for comparison

Auto VY SS with breathing mods, 5.6s

My old FTO (116kw atw with light weight reduction) 6.5s

VW 4cyl Bora auto 10.7s

Ae101 Corolla with modded 4a-fe auto 10s

Stockish bugeye wrx moderate launch 6.14s

My old Mazda 3 MPS, breathing mods and 17psi (Hardish shifting, good launch, car required shift to third) 6s

Bugeye wrx with medium mods and a slipping clutch lol 5.6s

2jz-ge supra (so non turbo) i think was ~6.3s with breathing mods

Anyways, not complete accuracy but it was all in fun haha. Plus you can see the times are fairly close to what magazines get after you factor in stock vs mod and accounting for 0-100km/h and 0-60mp/h.

While it's not complete accuracy

Hrmm might make the trek to wsid in a few weeks now...curious heh.

Ahh ok American numbers. It most likely has a "roll out" 30cm margin in that time where the car is not timed. There was a comprehensive-ish post on 350z tech regarding American testing methods for 0-100 and 1/4 mile. That 30cm rollout would shave off around 0.3 or so seconds from a proper timing from standstill.

It explains why American magazines are publishing low 13s quarter and low 5s (almost dipping into 4s) for the new 370Z whilst Aussie mags are getting the best of high 5s/6 and high 13's for the 1/4. E.g American 370z 0-60mph is 5.2 and Aussie 370z 0-100 is 5.8 so 0.3s for 30cm rollout and around 0.3s for the difference between 0-60mph and 0-100km/h.

Also the G35's in the US sometime after introduction got the VQ35DE revup motor with a bit more power like our local 350Zs. Whereas the 350GT skylines never got an engine upgrade when facelifted/series 2 (Nissan should've done it though grr.. would've paid the extra and enjoy the higher redline).

Fwiw i've timed my car at 5.7s for 0-60mph with hard-ish shifting and a good launch which i'm pretty happy with as i've got the premium pack/tv/Bose and sunroof (more weight than usual). Done with one of those g-tech meters which while not completely accurate, is a good tool to compare to other cars long as you're using the same unit.

Off the top of my head, some other numbers from the same meter for comparison

Auto VY SS with breathing mods, 5.6s

My old FTO (116kw atw with light weight reduction) 6.5s

VW 4cyl Bora auto 10.7s

Ae101 Corolla with modded 4a-fe auto 10s

Stockish bugeye wrx moderate launch 6.14s

My old Mazda 3 MPS, breathing mods and 17psi (Hardish shifting, good launch, car required shift to third) 6s

Bugeye wrx with medium mods and a slipping clutch lol 5.6s

2jz-ge supra (so non turbo) i think was ~6.3s with breathing mods

Anyways, not complete accuracy but it was all in fun haha. Plus you can see the times are fairly close to what magazines get after you factor in stock vs mod and accounting for 0-100km/h and 0-60mp/h.

While it's not complete accuracy

Hrmm might make the trek to wsid in a few weeks now...curious heh.

IN addition 0-60mph = 0-96km/h

so the extra 0.2 second (based on v35 times) I mentioned is extra time needed to go from 96km/h to 100lm/h

Ahh ok American numbers. It most likely has a "roll out" 30cm margin in that time where the car is not timed. There was a comprehensive-ish post on 350z tech regarding American testing methods for 0-100 and 1/4 mile. That 30cm rollout would shave off around 0.3 or so seconds from a proper timing from standstill.

It explains why American magazines are publishing low 13s quarter and low 5s (almost dipping into 4s) for the new 370Z whilst Aussie mags are getting the best of high 5s/6 and high 13's for the 1/4. E.g American 370z 0-60mph is 5.2 and Aussie 370z 0-100 is 5.8 so 0.3s for 30cm rollout and around 0.3s for the difference between 0-60mph and 0-100km/h.

Also the G35's in the US sometime after introduction got the VQ35DE revup motor with a bit more power like our local 350Zs. Whereas the 350GT skylines never got an engine upgrade when facelifted/series 2 (Nissan should've done it though grr.. would've paid the extra and enjoy the higher redline).

Fwiw i've timed my car at 5.7s for 0-60mph with hard-ish shifting and a good launch which i'm pretty happy with as i've got the premium pack/tv/Bose and sunroof (more weight than usual). Done with one of those g-tech meters which while not completely accurate, is a good tool to compare to other cars long as you're using the same unit.

Off the top of my head, some other numbers from the same meter for comparison

Auto VY SS with breathing mods, 5.6s

My old FTO (116kw atw with light weight reduction) 6.5s

VW 4cyl Bora auto 10.7s

Ae101 Corolla with modded 4a-fe auto 10s

Stockish bugeye wrx moderate launch 6.14s

My old Mazda 3 MPS, breathing mods and 17psi (Hardish shifting, good launch, car required shift to third) 6s

Bugeye wrx with medium mods and a slipping clutch lol 5.6s

2jz-ge supra (so non turbo) i think was ~6.3s with breathing mods

Anyways, not complete accuracy but it was all in fun haha. Plus you can see the times are fairly close to what magazines get after you factor in stock vs mod and accounting for 0-100km/h and 0-60mp/h.

While it's not complete accuracy

Hrmm might make the trek to wsid in a few weeks now...curious heh.

hrmmm ur probably right about the rolling start but here's a link to a rough guide of specs for the 350GT (site i believe is american based) and also has tuning mods that u can do to boost performance.

http://nissanskyline.6te.net/GT350_spec.htm

btw Touge K

whats mods do u have? 5.7 for 0-60 is very fast for our car!

They're listed in my sig, it's nothing drastic. The sticky tires do help though as does the manual box for launching! Maybe a bit slower now though as i've changed the sussy and it won't squat as much on launch.

Ah yes, the American rolling start! I'm surprised it doesn't get mentioned in the magazines; I only went snooping when I read that the 3.5l FWD American Camry manual was posting 6 secs to 60mph on either C&D or R&T. I thought that can't be right.

Does anybody have their 0-100 and quarter mile times verified at a track by any chance?

With the revup motor on the later G35s, were they the ones that had the oil consumption problem? I'd love to have the HR engine but imagine if we have that problem here! Unsupported and without warranty ... :D

Edited by pudogg
remove back seat, remove any audio, remove some driver weight... (these cost nil)

I find it ineffective, personally.

The FM platform cars are front heavy. Due to the suspension they also axle tramp a fair bit off the line. Pulling weight out of the rear just exacerbates the problem, and might actually make your times worse.

I know that, on the circuit, my car feels more planted and stable with my spare in the boot.

If you can pull weight out of the front, then that would be worthwhile.

IN addition 0-60mph = 0-96km/h

so the extra 0.2 second (based on v35 times) I mentioned is extra time needed to go from 96km/h to 100lm/h

Bear in mind that Nissan also "cheats" a bit to make the time look better.

With a 206kW engine's stock redline, our cars don't quite reach 100km/hr. I am pretty sure the 0-60mph times only require 1 gearchange. Running a 0-100km/hr times definitely require 2.

You should see low 14s, depending on the driver. My Z ran a 14 flat with a drag racing nub (i.e. me) with a Hitech catback and dead 17" RT215s. I know I didn't have the Unichip at the time - I can't recall if I had the JUN flywheel in. The V35s weigh more, but also seem to dyno higher as well. The softer suspension tune might also give you a bit more traction off the line.

Edited by scathing
  • 1 month later...
So,

We most people are getting the following mods:

- Z tube/CF Tube

- Plenum Spacer

- CAI/Pop Charger

- Ground kit.

I've been reading gains of 15wKW or 20whp, for all these mods combined

What I want to know effect these mods will have on our 0-100km/h and 1/4mile times.

I'm looking at taking my car to the track in a few months for some 1/4 mile runs, so I guess I'm curious whether it'll improve my times.

for 03-05 Coupes

0-100

6MT about 6.0

5AT about 6.3

1/4mile mid 14's

I'm guessing that if the Grounding kit improves the 5AT's shifting, wouldn't that bring its acceleration closer to that of the 6MT?

Hi , I am new to this and wondering if you can answer something for me. I have a 350GT Skyline AT and after having a TT 300ZX MT found it was missing some grunt so I had an APS Twin Turbo System added , it is the system they use in the 350Z with an extension to the exhaust ,mild tuning it is now 252kwrw. What do you think it would do the 0-100 now

Hi , I am new to this and wondering if you can answer something for me. I have a 350GT Skyline AT and after having a TT 300ZX MT found it was missing some grunt so I had an APS Twin Turbo System added , it is the system they use in the 350Z with an extension to the exhaust ,mild tuning it is now 252kwrw. What do you think it would do the 0-100 now

depends? more power doesnt necessarily mean quicker 0-100 time. those APS TT kits sure make the 350 burn some serious rubber. i think you will find it more difficult to pull "consistent" 0-100 times in your car now.

with RWD cars consistency is one of the most difficult things when going for quarter/track/0-100 times. with my tuned skyline on a gtech it was so difficult to control the power my times would spread as far as over a second from 0-100. One of the main reasons why i sold the car.

with the 09 WRX i have now the times are very very consistent and are within .2 of a second each time i give the 0-100 a run.

but the RWD does take a lot more skill to pull off a "perfect" launch. only to get there you need rediculous amounts of practice.

What DrewII said :starwars:.

Realistically, if you had good rubber and nailed a really good launch and shift to 2nd, i would dare guess your time should be flat 5, or very high 4's. Too hard to guess really.

I notice you said your car is automatic though, so i think the best way to get consistent 0-100 in your tt 350gt would be to just push the stick to manual stick, and floor it off idle and make sure you leave traction control on lol so the computer does all the work and thus you get consistent times. You could try the brake hold and dial in a bit of revs for some boost but i'm pretty sure that would be too much power and the ecu will just cut in to get traction back.

0-100 doesn't really favour heavy cars, and the 350gt is no lightweight.. Your TT kit will show it's true potential if you take it down the 1/4, versus just a short 0-100km/h test.. TT 350z's run around high 12 and low 13 sec quarters from memory which will suggest a low 5 or high 4 0-100 but don't forget they run that quarter time on the dragstrip where the road is super grippy.

depends? more power doesnt necessarily mean quicker 0-100 time. those APS TT kits sure make the 350 burn some serious rubber. i think you will find it more difficult to pull "consistent" 0-100 times in your car now.

with RWD cars consistency is one of the most difficult things when going for quarter/track/0-100 times. with my tuned skyline on a gtech it was so difficult to control the power my times would spread as far as over a second from 0-100. One of the main reasons why i sold the car.

with the 09 WRX i have now the times are very very consistent and are within .2 of a second each time i give the 0-100 a run.

but the RWD does take a lot more skill to pull off a "perfect" launch. only to get there you need rediculous amounts of practice.

I agree , the traction control does help and the excelleration is heaps better now with TT and playing with the tiptronic is not like MT but something different to play with. Bit sad that I did not get a MT but still enjoy the AT and more so with the TT giving it a bit more go. I do not think I would ever pull off a perfect launch , pefrect lunch I can do :starwars:

What DrewII said :) .

Realistically, if you had good rubber and nailed a really good launch and shift to 2nd, i would dare guess your time should be flat 5, or very high 4's. Too hard to guess really.

I notice you said your car is automatic though, so i think the best way to get consistent 0-100 in your tt 350gt would be to just push the stick to manual stick, and floor it off idle and make sure you leave traction control on lol so the computer does all the work and thus you get consistent times. You could try the brake hold and dial in a bit of revs for some boost but i'm pretty sure that would be too much power and the ecu will just cut in to get traction back.

0-100 doesn't really favour heavy cars, and the 350gt is no lightweight.. Your TT kit will show it's true potential if you take it down the 1/4, versus just a short 0-100km/h test.. TT 350z's run around high 12 and low 13 sec quarters from memory which will suggest a low 5 or high 4 0-100 but don't forget they run that quarter time on the dragstrip where the road is super grippy.

Thanks for your info , as I probably would never run it any where I could time it at least I have an idea and will not talk too much s--t if asked. It just felt so much quicker so I thought I would ask some one that knows. As a Jap import it is governed to 180 , but for a great grand dad thats enough , still got the boy inside wanting to get out and now and then he does, haha :starwars:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...