Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

With rev limit 8000rpm... does it use the column N19 or only N18?

Also see my base map please... this is with recalc base...

N19-P20

N20-P20

It isn't logical to be so low right? It must be more than N18-P20 right?

Why I ask all theese..

My car run 2bar-30psi and I don't have datalogit right now to tune anything in my car...

As I run this boost I only intersting for row p20 and cells from n13 to n20.

I run the car with rev limit 7500... it was ok 10.8afr! I run it 8000rpm... again ok 10.8!

But ofcourse at theese rpms with so fast car it is different to see the gauge and understand. Also the last rpms before the limit you cannot understand if the numbers are from rev limit or the afr from last rpms.

So I want to tell me if the map seems to be ok to theese cells or in theory the car will be very lean if it will read the N19-P20,N20-P20!

Remember in the foto is recalc the base.

My guess that theese cells must be 40 and 42 is right?

basea.jpg

Also the car take out oils at theese boost.. I undestand it because I don't have oil catch can and the oils goes at the turbo and many smokes suddenly filling all the car haha!

The first time my heart stop for some seconds to work!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276234-power-fc-tuning-help-questions/
Share on other sites

i really need to see both fuel maps: feel free to email me the map [email protected] i will have a look over it and do a few adjustments if neccessary. Generally speaking if the map ponts in the main map are linear accross the rpm points then yes the N19 and N20 points you have highlighted should also be linear (increasing) not decreasing.

Edited by URAS

URAS so you mean that N19 and N20 must be sure more than N18 right? So more than 39... and now is only 25!!

With 8000rpm limit will be lean the last rpms??

In the foto I have recalc the base!!

You have two emails :)

paulr33

Thanks for the tip... I wish to know it earlier :)

base2c.jpg

just emailed the maps back, i had to make some big changes so you will need to reload them via datalogit and check AFR's the original fuel and base maps were full of big holes.

Edited by URAS

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...