Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...em=320390328680

i can get it in stainless all they way for just over $1100

wanting to know how much work there is installing it? as i have not done one myself.

and what do yas rekon about quality?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/277053-xforce-r34-gtt-exhaust/
Share on other sites

Exhaust systems like that from R32 - R34 are very easy to install, as long as you are fairly handy and have the right tools (a hoist always helps too).

X-Force are reasonable quality systems, not the greatest but not crap either... Although $1100 seems pretty expensive. I would call Trojan and speak with Angelo before you buy that exhaust, he might be able to source something better quality for around the same money.

I had an X-Force turboback system on my old R33 GTS-T and it seemed like a reasonable quality system, although I recall the guys at Powatone saying it was a bit of a bastard to fit.

I'd also be asking how loud it is without the silencer, unless you like having that big bung in there.

x-force isn't a bad brand.

Although, for that amount of $$$, you could go to custom city exhaust and get a custom exhaust made up to suit what you like (loud, quiet etc) for that sort of money.

I had a few x-force mufflers on previous cars, they worked a treat :laugh:

You can usually get a custom mild steel system made for around $900 - $1100 for a full turbo back exhaust.

As Mick said, go talk to Angelo @ Trojan about sourcing a system for you. A jap brand cat back system is usually around $800 (add $300 - $400 for a decent dumppipe).

Depends on what you want as well, loud, quiet, legal limit etc... The Kakimoto Regu systems have a very very nice growl without being obnoxiously loud.

If you were referring to me TiTAN, the $900 - $1100 custom mild does include a cat in the estimate, yes... I paid $950 for my first 3" mild steel custom setup for the whole thing.

That was with a ceramic cat, i'm now running a metalcat.

Mate, you should have no worries with the system.. The muffler in the middle should allow it to not be as drony as most 'cannon' style systems.

If you haven't had your standard dumppipe off before from the turbo, you may need to start getting some wd40 to all 6 bolts. The amount of heating/cooling they have gone through will make them a pain in the behind to get off.

Honestly, the first time i replaced the dump, i used a little bit of exhaust gasket goo with the factory gasket. I know it isn't the 'done' thing but it worked. It was replaced when the new turbo arrived about 5 - 6 months later.

If you are keen on keeping your current turbo and would like a new gasket, hit up Angelo @ Trojan, he should be able to get a genuine one for you pretty easily (he may even have one stocked).

Sweet, i still gotta get it passed for rego befor i do anything anyway, so i got a bit of time...

can ya recomend a good place to take it to for that? its stock so it shouldn't have a problem, just have to get it transfered into my name and into ACT rego

Unless the rules have changed recently, I think you will find that if you bought it privately from interstate that it HAS to go through Dickson for an identity check as well as a roadworthy.

When I bought my GTR in from Vic 6 months ago I was told that it had to go through Dickson even though it came via a compliance shop/dealer, just didn't need the identity check part.

Just ring the motor registry and ask.

I bought mine off a mate in Canberra. I had a lot of trouble getting someone to look at it because it was lightly modified and because it was a grey import. Problem was when I rang to find out I got a different answer from someone every time.

I couldn't get an appointment in Dickson, so to avoid me getting fined they ended up letting me take it to Jackos (which used to be in Dickson).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...