Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey peepz,

Does anyone know if relocating the air flow meter onto intercooler piping is ok to do? would it cause any problems?

Im not too sure because normally uncompressed air runs through the AFM and if it was on the cooler piping it owuld have 1 bar of boost going thru it....

Any advice?

thnx!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/278988-air-flow-meter-relocation-question/
Share on other sites

It works fine, however if you run significant boost, then the housing will split/crack. The only real reason i can see for doing it is so you can run an amo BOV without the overfuelling, but for that to work the afm has to be plumbed after the BOV

Do you think the reading becomes more accurate as the temp increases?

It's more accurate overall. Only if you have an aftermarket ECU. It means you can eliminate cooler efficiency as a variable in most cases. It also stops the overfueling on throttle off with an atmo bov like you said.

Im running 15psi,

Basically i wanna run no BOV at all, put a metal plate behind the factory BOV, this should help me reduce lag on my 2540 and have the flutter noise :) Yea i noe some might be against that but im bored of my silent car lol

If I kept the AFM in the original position then when back off the accelerator the air would rush backwards throught the turbo and then via the intake/AFM, which would damage the AFM, is that right?

tom

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I hadn't thought about the variable power steering assist. Presumably, it will always be the same level of assist as you get in an S14. The R32/3/4 are either helliishly heavy (at low speeds) if the solenoid is not powered at all, or hellishly too light (at high speed) if it is powered all the time. I presume that it is PWM controlled on those cars. I hadn't thought about the S cars not having variable assist. ugh. What crappy plebby cars they must be!  
    • Hmm yeah that is a good point. It looks like it'll just bolt in with no real issue besides maybe the bushings being different. My other concern was that 2 pin plug that I assume is used in some way to control the rack solenoid depending on the speed signal from the ecu. The DMAX rack doesn't even have that plug though so, don't think it'll matter. Might just order the rack and see how it goes. Will update this when I figure something out
    • I'd say it's a fair bet that the feed and return fluid lines will be in different enough spots that you would need to come up with a way to cut the originals short and adapt with new hard line adaption or braided teflon hoses or somesuch. But really, you have the car, you have the photos of the DMAX rack - you should be able to go out there and see for yourself whether they're in the same or different spots.
    • I've been doing some looking around and honestly was just considering throwing a new rack at it. I saw that the dmax silvia rack bolts up into the 33 with the silvia bushings but not sure if the high pressure lines will sit in the correct spot. I believe other version of the 33 rack are the same/similar to the racks that can be opened up without as much fuss so I assume the dmax rack would fit but any ideas?
    • I've never played with one, but I would expect that you are correct. That slot looks like it is intended to be used to unscrew the end, and the flats on the body would be better than grabbing it around the round bit with a pipe wrench. So, yeah, probably unscrews. You'll probably have to make a tool to drive in that slot.
×
×
  • Create New...